UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11


img125871598_0.jpg 

MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT 2022 NOTICE OF ANNUAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

img125871598_1.jpg 

Date:

Tuesday,

September 19, 2023

No fee required.

img125871598_2.jpg 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.Time:

10a.m. Eastern Time

(1)

img125871598_3.jpg 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:Location:

www.virtualshareholder

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

meeting.com/SWBI2023


LOGO

SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

October 13, 2020

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, will be held at 12:10:00 p.m.a.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, October 13, 2020.September 19, 2023 (the “2023 Annual Meeting”). The 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be a virtual meeting of stockholders. You will be able to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, vote, and submit your questions during the live webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2020SWBI2023 and entering the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

The 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held for the following purposes:

1.                 To elect directors to serve until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

2.                 To provide a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2020 (“say-on-pay”).

3.                 To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as the independent registered public accountant of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021.

4.                 To vote upon a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting.

5.                 To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on August 21, 2020 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting and vote electronically during the meeting. To assure your representation at the meeting, however, you are urged to vote by proxy as soon as possible over the Internet as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or, if you receive paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by telephone or by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card. You may vote electronically during the meeting even if you have previously given your proxy.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Robert J. Cicero

Secretary

Springfield, Massachusetts

August 28, 2020


TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOTING AND OTHER MATTERSITEMS OF BUSINESS

1

COMPANY’S UPDATES1

5

Election of directors

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS2

7

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation ("say-on-pay")

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE3

11

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

18

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

43

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

44

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

69

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

71

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

72

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

73

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

74

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

77

PROPOSAL TWO — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (“SAY-ON-PAY”)

78

PROPOSAL THREE — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

81

PROPOSAL FOUR — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

83

DEADLINES FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

93

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

96

OTHER MATTERS

97

APPENDIX A ADJUSTED EBITDAS

98


LOGO

SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.

2100 Roosevelt Avenue

Springfield, Massachusetts 01104

PROXY STATEMENT

VOTING AND OTHER MATTERS

General

The enclosed proxy is being solicited on behalf of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, by our Board of Directors for use at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 12:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, October 13, 2020, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in this proxy statement and in the accompanying notice. The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be a virtual meeting. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders during the live webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2020 and entering the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet, we are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of our proxy statement and our 2020 Annual Report to most of our stockholders. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how to access those documents and vote over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including our proxy statement, our 2020 Annual Report, and a form of proxy card. We believe this process will allow us to provide our stockholders the information they need in a more timely manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering our costs of printing and delivering the proxy materials.

These proxy solicitation materials were first released on or about August 28, 2020 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on October 13, 2020. These proxy materials, which include the notice of annual meeting, this proxy statement, and our 2020 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

How Does the Board of Directors Recommend That You Vote

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote as follows:

·

FOR the election of each of the nominee directors (Proposal One);

·

FOR the advisoryAdvisory vote on the compensationfrequency of our named executive officers for fiscal 2020 (Proposal Two);future say-on-pay votes

·

4

FOR the ratificationRatification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accountantaccounting firm

5

Advisory vote to call special stockholder meeting

6

Ratification of our company forNevada exclusive forum provision

7

Stockholder proposals, if properly presented

And such other business as may properly come before the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021 (Proposal Three); and2023 Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

·

AGAINST approval of the stockholder proposal (Proposal Four).

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        1


  VOTING AND OTHER MATTERS  

Stockholders Entitled to Vote; Record Date; How to Vote

Stockholders of record at the close of business on August 21, 2020, which we have set as the record date, are entitled to notice of and toJuly 28, 2023 may vote at the meeting. On2023 Annual Meeting.

These proxy materials were first made available to our stockholders on the record date, there were outstanding 55,900,419 sharesinternet on [ ], 2023.

Sincerely,

img125871598_4.jpg 

Kevin A. Maxwell

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary

[ ], 2023


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement Summary

1

Board And Governance Matters

3

Proposal One – Election of Directors

3

Compensation Matters

16

Proposal Two – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

16

Proposal Three – Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Say-on-Pay Votes

17

Compensation Discussion And Analysis

18

Executive Compensation

31

Audit Matters

44

Proposal Four – Ratification Of Appointment Of Independent Registered Public Accountant

44

Management Proposals

46

Proposal Five – Management Proposal (Advisory Vote to Call Special Stockholder Meeting)

46

Proposal Six – Management Proposal (Ratification of Nevada Exclusive Forum Provision)

48

Stockholder Proposals

50

Proposal Seven – Stockholder Proposal (Right to Call A Special Shareholder Meeting)

50

Proposal Eight – Stockholder Proposal (Human Rights Impact Assessment)

52

Other Important Information

57

Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

57

Annual Report on Form 10-K

58

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

58

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the 2023 Annual Meeting and Voting

58


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

MEETING INFORMATION

  Time and Date

10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, September 19, 2023

  Location

Online via webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2023

  Record Date

July 28, 2023

MEETING AGENDA

Proposals

Board

Recommendation

Page

 

 

 

 

1.

Election of Seven Directors

FOR each nominee

3

2.

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

FOR

16

3.

Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Say-on-Pay Votes

 

ONE YEAR

 

17

4.

Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche, LLP

FOR

44

5.

Management Proposal - Advisory Vote to Call Special Stockholder Meeting

FOR

46

6.

Management Proposal - Ratification of Nevada Exclusive Forum Provision

 

FOR

 

48

7.

Stockholder Proposal - Right to Call Special Shareholder Meeting

 

AGAINST

 

50

8.

Stockholder Proposal - Human Rights Impact Assessment

 

AGAINST

 

52

Name

Age

Director

Since

Experience

Committee

Memberships

Other Public

Company Boards

Anita D. Britt *

60

2018

Former CFO of Perry Ellis International, Inc.

AC **, CC, ESG

3

Fred M. Diaz *

57

2021

Former President and CEO of Mitsubishi Motor North America, Inc.

CC, ESG**

3

Michelle J. Lohmeier*

60

2023

Former Strategic Advisor to CEO of Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.

CC, ESG

2

Barry M. Monheit *

76

2004

Former President of Financial Consulting

Division of FTI Consulting

CC **, NCG

1

Robert L. Scott

77

1999

Former President of a predecessor of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.

AC, NCG

0

Mark P. Smith

47

2020

President and CEO of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.

-

0

Denis G. Suggs *

57

2021

 

CEO of LCP Transportation LLC

 

AC, NCG**

1

* = Independent Nominee; ** = Committee Chair;§ =Chairman

AC = Audit Committee; CC = Compensation Committee; ESG = Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee; NCG = Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee

img125871598_5.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 1


Proxy Statement Summary

KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Our key accomplishments for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2023 (“fiscal 2023”) include:

Continued Investments in Our Business

In fiscal 2023, our capital allocation strategy continued to focus on investments in our business associated with the move of our headquarters and significant elements of our operations to Maryville, Tennessee (the “Relocation”). In fiscal 2023, we spent approximately $98 million in aggregate on the Relocation. Once the Relocation is completed, we will be positioned to deliver improved operating and financial performance, in part, due to the realization of certain distribution and manufacturing efficiencies.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Board Refreshment

We recognize the importance of board refreshment. Over 70% of our common stock. Eachdirector nominees have joined our board of directors (the "Board") since 2018. This demonstrates the Board’s commitment to refreshment, including with independent nominees who provide perspectives and experience to support our strategy. Of our seven director nominees, two are women, one is a racial minority, and one is an ethnic minority.

Risk Oversight

Given the nature of our business, the Board remains focused on overseeing risk management. In addition to the Audit Committee receiving periodic presentations on enterprise risk management, during fiscal 2023, the Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee (the “ESG Committee”) discussed the campaign against the firearm industry at each of its meetings, and the full Board reviewed an updated report prepared by a third-party media monitoring firm that we have worked with for several years. During fiscal 2023, we also formalized a process whereby our Audit Committee Chair communicates directly with our Chief Compliance Officer at least quarterly in between scheduled Audit Committee meetings.

Stockholder Engagement

We recognize the importance of stockholder voting atengagement. In addition to our regular, year-round stockholder engagement initiatives, prior to our annual meeting of stockholders held on September 12, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Meeting”), we met with certain of our largest stockholders to discuss, among other things, two stockholder proposals. In early 2023, we again met with certain of our largest stockholders. We used these meetings to, among other things, solicit our stockholders’ views on the meeting, either electronically duringright of stockholders to call special meetings (see Proposals 5 and 7) and our exclusive forum bylaw provision (see Proposal 6). We also engaged in April 2023 with our social activist stockholders (see Proposal 8).

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Pay for Performance

Our executive compensation program emphasizes our pay-for-performance philosophy. For fiscal 2023:

100% of our named executive officers’ (“NEOs”) annual cash incentive goals were tied to company performance (Net Sales and Adjusted EBITDAS); Adjusted EBITDAS also served as the meeting orthreshold for which the failure to achieve this performance metric would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the other performance metric.
60% of our NEOs’ stock-based award value was tied to our performance, as reflected by proxy, may cast one vote per sharerelative total shareholder return value.
Our NEOs received no annual cash incentive payment for fiscal 2023 because we failed to achieve the threshold target for Adjusted EBITDAS.
Our NEOs who received a stock-based award in 2020 receivednone of the target shares of common stock held on all matters to be voted on atfor the meeting.

If, on August 21, 2020, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Issuer Direct Corporation, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote electronically during the meeting. Alternatively, you may vote by proxy over the Internet as instructed above or, if you receive paper copiesperformance-based restricted stock unit (“PSU”) portion of the proxy materials by mail, by usingaward because we failed to meet the accompanying proxy card or by telephone. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy over the Internet as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or, if you receive paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, by filling out and returning the enclosed proxy card, or by telephone as instructed on the enclosed proxy card to ensure your vote is counted. Even if you have submitted a proxy before the meeting, you may still attend the meeting and vote electronically during the meeting.minimum performance requirements.

2 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


If, on August 21, 2020, your shares were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, or similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. You should have received voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from us. You should follow the instructions provided by that organization to submit your proxy. You are also invited to attend the meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares electronically during the meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

How to Attend the Meeting; Asking Questions

You are entitled to attend the meeting only if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on August 21, 2020, which we have set as the record date, or you hold a valid proxy for the meeting. You may attend the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2020 and using your 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials to enter the meeting. If, on August 21, 2020, your shares were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, or similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and you will be required to provide proof of beneficial ownership, such as your most recent account statement as of the record date, a copy of the voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you do not comply with the procedures outlined above, you will not be admitted to the virtual annual meeting.

Stockholders who wish to submit a question for the meeting may do so live during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2020.

Quorum

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of common stock entitled to vote constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting. Votes cast electronically during the meeting or by proxy at the meeting will be tabulated by the election inspector appointed for the meeting, who will determine whether a quorum is present.

BOARD AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS

2    

    LOGO

2020

PROPOSAL One – election of directors

What Am I Voting On? Stockholders are being asked to elect each of the seven director nominees named in this Proxy Statement to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2024 (the “2024 Annual Meeting”) and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

Voting Recommendation:FORthe election of each of the seven director nominees

Vote Required: A director will be elected if that director nominee receives a majority of the votes cast

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board, subject to limitations and other requirements in our charter documents or in applicable statutes, rules, and regulations, including those of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”).

Our governance framework supports independent oversight and accountability.

Independent Oversight

Accountability

6 of 7 director nominees are independent

Non-Executive Chairman

All independent committees

Demonstrated commitment to Board

     refreshment – over 70% of the Board has joined since 2018

Majority voting in uncontested elections

Annual election of directors

Annual advisory say-on-pay vote

Robust over-boarding policy

Proxy access right

Our governance framework is based on our Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”), as well as the key governance documents listed below:

Code of Conduct and Ethics
Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers
Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”)
Charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCG Committee”) and the ESG Committee

Copies of these documents are available on our website, www.smith-wesson.com, or upon written request sent to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 2100 Roosevelt Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104. The information on our website is not part of this Proxy Statement.

img125871598_5.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 3


Board and Governance Matters

BOARD COMPOSITION

Director Skills and Qualifications

The NCG Committee, using a matrix of director skills and experiences that the Board believes are needed to address existing and emerging business and governance issues relevant to us (the “Skills Matrix”), reviews with the Board annually the desired experiences, mix of skills, and other qualities required for new Board members, as well as Board composition. The Board seeks director candidates who possess the requisite judgment, background, skill, expertise, and time to strengthen and increase the breadth of skills and qualifications of the Board. In particular, the Board may consider, among other things, the fit of the individual’s skills, background, qualifications, experience, and personality with those of other directors in maintaining an effective, collegial, and responsive Board and a mix of diversity in personal and professional experience, background, viewpoints, perspectives, knowledge, and abilities.

Diversity Considerations. The Board does not have a specific diversity policy; however, as noted above, diversity is among the factors the NCG Committee may consider in connection with its annual review of desired experiences, mix of skills, and other qualities required for new Board members. We have posted a board diversity matrix on our website, www.smith-wesson.com, to comply with a Nasdaq rule. The information on our website is not part of this Proxy Statement.

  VOTING AND OTHER MATTERS  

Governance Spotlight

Of our seven director nominees, two are women, one is a racial minority, and one is an ethnic minority.

Skills Matrix. The NCG Committee developed the Skills Matrix in fiscal 2023 in response to requests from certain of our investors for more detailed information concerning our directors’ qualifications. The NCG Committee adopted the Skills Matrix to facilitate the comparison of our directors’ skills and experiences to those that the Board believes are needed to address existing and emerging business and governance issues relevant to us. The table below lists those skills and experiences, along with the total number of director nominees who possess the particular skill or experience.

Required Vote

Skill/Experience

Description

# of Director Nominees

 Executive

Experience serving as a CEO or a senior executive provides a practical understanding of a complex business like ours.

7 of 7

 Public Company Board

Service on other public company boards facilitates an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends, and insights into board management.

5 of 7

 Regulated Industry /

  Government

Experience with regulated industries and government provides insight and perspective in working constructively and proactively with government agencies.

4 of 7

 Sales and Marketing

Experience in sales, brand management, marketing, and marketing strategy provides a perspective on how to better market our products.

3 of 7

 Risk Management

Given the importance of the Board’s role in risk oversight, we seek directors who can help identify, manage, and mitigate key risks.

6 of 7

 Financial

Understanding financial reporting and accounting processes enables monitoring and assessment of operating and strategic performance and facilitates accurate financial reporting and robust controls.

4 of 7

 Manufacturing

Functional experience in a senior operating position with a manufacturing company can help us drive operating performance.

6 of 7

 Environmental, Social,

  and Governance

Experience with ESG matters, including sustainability, human capital management and corporate ethics, enables management of ESG risks and opportunities.

3 of 7

Assuming

4 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

Director Independence

Under the Guidelines and the Nasdaq listing standards, the Board must consist of a majority of independent directors. The Board annually reviews director independence and has determined that all director nominees, except for Mr. Smith (who is our President and CEO), are independent, as “independence” is defined by the SEC and the Nasdaq listing standards.

Board Refreshment

We recognize the importance of Board refreshment. Directors are elected each year at our annual meeting of stockholders to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. The NCG Committee regularly considers Board composition and how Board composition changes over time.

The Board has not established a mandatory retirement age; however, pursuant to the Guidelines, the Board and the NCG Committee review, in connection with the process of selecting nominees for election at annual stockholder meetings, each director’s continuation on the Board.

Governance Spotlight

Michelle Lohmeier was appointed to the Board in July 2023, demonstrating the Board's commitment to refreshment.

Of our seven director nominees, five have joined the Board since 2018.

The Board has not established term limits; however, pursuant to the Guidelines, the NCG Committee reviews each director’s continuation on the Board at least every three years, which, among other things, allows the Board, through the NCG Committee, to consider the appropriateness of the director’s continued service.

Director Nomination Process

The NCG Committee is responsible for identifying and evaluating Board nominees. In identifying candidates, the NCG Committee may take into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include personal qualities and characteristics, individual character and integrity, mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical skills and accomplishments, and the extent to which the candidate would fill a quorumpresent need on the Board.

Stockholder-Recommended Candidates. The NCG Committee will consider persons recommended by our stockholders for inclusion as Board nominees if the information required by our Bylaws is present,submitted in writing in a timely manner addressed and delivered to our Secretary.

Stockholder-Nominated Candidates. We have a “Proxy Access for Director Nominations” bylaw that permits a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials Board nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the affirmative vote ofBoard (whichever is greater), provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws.

Majority Voting Standard

Our directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast will be required for the election of each director nominee, to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as the independent registered public accountant of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021, and to approve the stockholder proposal. The advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2020 (“say-on-pay”) is non-binding, but our Board of Directors will consider the input of stockholders based on a majority of votes cast for the say-on-pay proposal.

Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions

Brokers, banks, or other nominees that hold shares of common stockthem in “street name” for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion if permitted by the stock exchange or other organization of which they are members. Brokers, banks, and other nominees are permitted to vote the beneficial owner’s proxy in their own discretion as to certain “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from the beneficial owner, such as the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accountant of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021.uncontested elections. If a broker, bank, or other nominee votes such “uninstructed” shares for or against a “routine” proposal, those shares will be counted towards determining whether or not a quorum is present and are considered entitled to vote on the “routine” proposals. However, where a proposal is not “routine,” a broker, bank, or other nominee is not permitted to exercise its voting discretion on that proposal without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. These non-voted shares are referred to as “broker non-votes” when the nominee has voted on other non-routine matters with authorization or voted on routine matters. These shares will be counted towards determining whether or not a quorum is present, but will not be considered entitled to vote on the “non-routine” proposals.

Please note that brokers, banks, and other nominees may not use discretionary authority to vote shares on the election of directors, the say-on-pay proposal, or the stockholder proposal if they have not received specific instructions from their clients. For your vote to be counted in the election of directors, the say-on-pay proposal, and the stockholder proposal, you will need to communicate your voting decisions to your broker, bank, or other nominee before the date of the meeting.

As provided in our bylaws, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a nominee for election to our Board of Directors or any other proposal exceeds the number of shares voted “against” such nominee or other proposal. Because abstentions and broker non-votes do not represent votes cast “for” or “against” a proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors, the say-on-pay proposal, the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accountant of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021, or the stockholder proposal, as each such proposal is determined by reference to the votes actually cast by the shares present in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote.

In accordance with our director resignation policy, an incumbent director who does not receive the requisite majority of votes cast, in an uncontested electionthen the director is expected to submit his or her resignation to the Board. Based on the recommendation of the NCG Committee, the Board would determine whether to accept the resignation and would publicly disclose its decision and its rationale. A director who tenders his or her offer of resignation to our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee, will make a determination as to whether to accept or reject the offered resignation within 90 days after the stockholder vote. A director whose offered resignation is under consideration willwould abstain from any decision or recommendation regarding the offered resignation.

LOGO2020

5 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    3

img125871598_6.jpg 



  VOTING AND OTHER MATTERS  

Board and Governance Matters

Over-Boarding Policy

offered resignation, but will otherwise continue toOur directors may not serve as a director until our Board of Directors makes its determination regardingon more than three other public company boards, unless it is determined, based on the offered resignation. We will publicly disclose our Board of Directors’ decision regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision in a filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.

Voting of Proxies

When a proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares it represents will be voted at the meeting as directed. Except as provided above under “Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions,” if no specification is indicated, the shares will be voted (1) “for” the election of each of the seven director nominees set forth in this proxy statement, (2) “for” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2020, (3) “for” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accountant of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021, and (4) “against” the stockholder proposal. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, the individuals specified in the proxy will vote your shares using their best judgment.

Revocability of Proxies

Any person giving a proxy may revoke the proxy at any time before its use by delivering to us either a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the meeting and voting electronically during the meeting (as provided under “Stockholders Entitled to Vote; Record Date; How to Vote”). Attendance at the meetingindividual facts, that such service will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request.

Solicitation

We will bearinterfere with service on the cost of this solicitation. In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies also may be solicited by certain of our directors and officers, personally or by telephone or e-mail, without additional compensation.

We have retained Morrow Sodali, a proxy solicitation firm, to perform various solicitation services in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will pay Morrow Sodali a fee of $10,000, plus phone and other related expenses, in connection with its solicitation services. Morrow Sodali has engaged approximately 15 of its employees to assist us in connection with the solicitation of proxies.

Annual Report and Other Matters

Our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders, which was made available to stockholders with or preceding this proxy statement, contains financial and other information about our company, but is not incorporated into this proxy statement and is not to be considered a part of these proxy materials or subject to Regulations 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The information contained in the “Compensation Committee Report” and the “Report of the Audit Committee” shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulations 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

We will provide, without charge, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020 as filed with the SEC to each stockholder of record as of the record date that requests a copy in writing. Any exhibits listed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K also will be furnished upon request at the actual expense we incur in furnishing such exhibits. Any such requests should be directed to our Secretary at the address of our executive offices set forth in this proxy statement.

4    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


COMPANY’S UPDATES

Executive Officer and Director Changes

Effective January 15, 2020, our Board of Directors appointed Mark P. Smith, former President of the Manufacturing Services division of our company, and Brian D. Murphy, former President of the Outdoor Products & Accessories division of our company, as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers of our company, to replace P. James Debney, who separated as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of our company, effective January 14, 2020.Board. In connection with the previously announced spin-offevaluation of these facts, the Chairman of the Board and Chair of the NCG Committee will consider the time commitment required by the director’s service, if any, in leadership positions (e.g., board chair, committee chair, lead independent director, etc.) on the Board and any other public company board of directors. None of our outdoor productsdirector nominees serves on more than three other public company boards and accessories business, orour CEO does not serve on any other public company board. The NCG reviews annually the Separation,time commitments of our independent directors.

Director Nominees

The Board currently has eight members. Pursuant to American Outdoor Brands, Inc., or AOUT, ourthe recommendation of the NCG Committee, the Board has nominated each current director for election at the 2023 Annual Meeting, except for Mr. Furman, who, after many years of Directorsdistinguished service to the Board, is retiring from the Board effective at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Ms. Lohmeier, who was appointed Mr. Smithto the Board in July 2023, was first identified as a director of our companycandidate by a third-party search firm and appointed Deana L. McPherson, former Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Corporate Controller, and Assistant Treasurer of our company, as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary of our company. Effective August 24, 2020, in connection with the Separation, Mr. Murphy resigned as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of our company to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of AOUT as a new independent, publicly traded company with Mr. Murphy continuing as the sole President and Chief Executive Officer of our company; and Gregory J. Gluchowski, Jr. and I. Marie Wadecki resigned from our Board of Directors to become directors of AOUT. In connection with the Separation, Mr. Buchanan, who served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, and Treasurer of our company, formalized his previously announced retirement from our company as of the close of business on August 23, 2020. Effective August 1, 2020, Lane A. Tobiassen, former President of the Firearm division of our company, separated from our company.

Spin-Off of Subsidiary

On August 24, 2020, we completed the Separation and AOUT became an independent, publicly traded company holding, directly or indirectly through its subsidiaries, the assets and legal entities, subject to any related liabilities, associated with the former outdoor products and accessories business of our company. The Separation was completed by way of a pro rata distribution, or the Distribution, of all the outstanding shares of AOUT common stock to the stockholders of record of our company as of the close of business on August 10, 2020, the record datewill stand for stockholder election for the Distribution, orfirst time at the Record Date. Each stockholder of our company received one share of AOUT common stock, $0.001 par value, for every four shares of common stock of our company, $0.001 par value, held by such stockholder as of the close of business on the Record Date. The distribution of these shares was made in book-entry form, which means that no physical share certificates were delivered. No fractional shares of AOUT common stock were delivered. The distribution agent for the Distribution, instead, aggregated fractional shares into whole shares, sold the whole shares in the open market at prevailing prices, and distributed the net cash proceeds from the sales pro rata to2023 Annual Meeting. If elected, each stockholder that otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in connection with the Distribution.

Name Change

On May 29, 2020, we changed the name of our company from “American Outdoor Brands Corporation” to “Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.” by entering into a plan of merger with our former wholly owned subsidiary, known as “Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.,” or Merger Sub, pursuant to which we agreed that Merger Sub would merge with and into our company, or the Merger. Following the consummation of the Merger, the separate existence of Merger Sub ceased, and we continued as the surviving corporation with our name changed to “Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.”

Adjustments to Outstanding Stock-Based Awards

In connection with the Separation, our outstanding stock-based awards, including restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based restricted stock units, or PSUs, were adjusted in a

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        5


  COMPANY’S UPDATES  

manner intended to maintain the intrinsic value of the RSUs and PSUs immediately prior to the Separation. The RSUs and PSUs held by our directors and executives generally were converted into RSUs or PSUs of our company and AOUT, such that each such holder would (i) continue to hold the existing RSU or PSU in our company covering the same number of shares of our common stock that were subject to the RSU or PSU prior to the Separation and (ii) receive an identical RSU or PSU covering one share of AOUT common stock for each four shares of our common stock covered by the RSU or PSU in our company, resulting in the RSUs or PSUs for our company, and AOUT, having a combined intrinsic value immediately after the Separation as before the Separation, taking into account any necessary adjustments to the exercise price (if any) to maintain such intrinsic value. The number of shares covered by, and the exercise price of the common stock underlying the RSUs in our company held by other employees, were adjusted so that the RSUs had the same intrinsic value immediately following the Separation as before the Separation. To the extent the existing award of our company is subject to vesting based upon continued service with our company, the new awardsdirector nominee will also remain subject to the same vesting conditions based upon continued employment with the holder’s post-Separation employer. In addition, to the extent the existing award of our company is subject to the achievement of certain company performance-based target goals, appropriate adjustments will be made to such target goals and incorporated into the new awards to reflect the changes to the businesses of each of our company and AOUT as a result of the Separation.

6    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL ONE  – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by resolution of our Board of Directors. The number of directors is currently fixed at seven. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that all directors are elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders for a term of one year and hold office until their successors arethe 2024 Annual Meeting and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

A board of seven directors is to be elected at this meeting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them “for” each of the nominees named below. All of the nominees currently are directors of our company. In the event that If any director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the meeting,2023 Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our current Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. It isWe do not expectedexpect that any director nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director.

Our

Set forth below is information about each director nominee, including a description of his or her qualifications to serve on the Board and a listing of Directors recommends a vote “for”certain key skills and experiences from the nominees listed below.Skills Matrix possessed by each director nominee.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the nominees for directors of our company:

ANITA D. BRITT

Age:60

Director since:2018

Independent

Board committees:

• Audit

• Compensation

• ESG

Other public company boards:

• Delta Apparel, Inc.

• urban-gro, Inc.

• VSE Corporation

Other public company boards within five years:

• None

Background:

Ms. Britt served as CFO of Perry Ellis International, Inc. from 2009 to 2017 and held senior financial leadership positions at Jones Apparel Group, Inc. (1993 to 2006) and Urban Brands, Inc. (2006 to 2009). Ms. Britt is a CPA and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. She is also a Board Leadership Fellow, as designated by the National Association of Corporate Directors. Ms. Britt holds a Carnegie Mellon Cybersecurity Oversight Certification and a Harvard Kennedy School Executive Education Certificate in Cybersecurity: The Intersection of Policy and Technology.

Key Qualifications and Skills Include:

   Financial. Extensive corporate finance, investor relations, and capital markets

 experience gained through service as a public company CFO and other senior

   financial roles; certified public accountant

   Public Company Board. Service on three other boards (see related caption)

   Risk Management. Certified public accountant; former public company

CFO; holds multiple cybersecurity certifications (see above)

 Name

6 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


AgePosition

Robert L. ScottBoard and Governance Matters

74

FRED M. DIAZ

Age:57

Director since:2021

Independent

Board committees:

• Compensation

• ESG

Other public company boards:

• Archer Aviation Inc.

• SiteOne Landscape Supply,
Inc.

• Valero Energy Corporation

Other public company boards within five years:

None

Background:

Mr. Diaz served as President and CEO of Mitsubishi Motor North America, Inc. from 2018 to 2020 and as General Manager, Performance Optimization Global Marketing and Sales of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation in Tokyo, Japan from 2017 to 2018. He served in various executive level positions with Nissan North America Inc. for four years and Chrysler Corporation LLC for 24 years, including as the President and CEO of the Ram Truck Brand and Chrysler of Mexico.

Key Qualifications and Skills Include:

   Executive. Former President and CEO of Mitsubishi Motor North America, the

Ram Truck Brand, and Chrysler of Mexico

   Manufacturing. Extensive operations experience gained through service as

executive of multinational manufacturers, including Mitsubishi and Chrysler

   Public Company Board. Service on three other boards (see related caption)

   Sales and Marketing. Former SVP, Sales & Marketing and Operations USA

for Nissan North America and Head of National Sales of Ram Truck Brand

MICHELLE J. LOHMEIER

Age:60

Director since:2023

Independent

Board committees:

• Compensation

• ESG

Other public company boards:

 Kaman Corp.

 Mistras Group, Inc.

Other public company boards within five years:

None

Background:

Ms. Lohmeier has been a director since July 2023. She is a former senior advisor to the CEO of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. having served in that position from 2019 to 2021. Prior to that, she had served as SVP and General Manager of Airbus Programs at Spirit AeroSystems. Before joining Spirit AeroSystems, Ms. Lohmeier held senior positions at Raytheon Company, including VP of the Land Warfare Systems product line at Raytheon Missile Systems. Previously, she was the program director at Raytheon for the design, development, and production implementation of the Standard Missile-6 weapon system for the U.S. Navy. She began her career with Hughes Aircraft Company as a system test engineer in 1985.

Key Qualifications and Skills Include:

    Manufacturing. Extensive operations experience gained through roles with

    Spirit AeroSystems, Raytheon, and Hughes Aircraft

    Public Company Board. Service on two other boards (see related caption)

    Regulated Industry/Government. Extensive experience in the highly

    regulated aerospace and defense industries

  BARRY M. MONHEIT

Age:76

Director since:2004

Independent

Board committees:

• Compensation

• NCG

Other public company boards:

• American Outdoor Brands, Inc.

Other public company boards within five years:

• None

Background:

Mr. Monheit served as Chairman of the Board (2)(3)from 2004 until the completion (on August 24, 2020) of the spin-off of our former outdoor products and accessories business (the “Separation”). Since the Separation, he has served as Chairman of American Outdoor Brands, Inc. From 2020 to July 2023, Mr. Monheit served as a Senior Managing Director of J.S. Held, LLC, a consulting company providing services in forensic accounting, fraud investigations, receivership and restructuring, and lost profit exams. He formerly served as President and CEO of Quest Resource Holding Corp., a publicly traded company, as a Senior Managing Director of FTI Palladium Partners, in various capacities with FTI Consulting, Inc., including President of its Financial Consulting Division, and as a partner with Arthur Andersen & Co., where he served as partner-in-charge of its New York Consulting Division and its U.S. Bankruptcy and Reorganization Practice.

Michael F. GoldenKey Qualifications and Skills Include:

    Executive. Former CEO of Quest Resource; Division President of FTI

Consulting; and partner of Arthur Andersen

    Financial. Retired certified public accountant; former partner of
    Arthur Andersen

    Public Company Board. Current Chairman of American Outdoor Brands, Inc.

7 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

66

ROBERT L. SCOTT

Age:77

Director since:1999

Independent

Board committees:

• Audit

• NCG

Other public company boards:

• None

Other public company boards within five years:

• None

Vice

Background:

Mr. Scott has served as our Chairman since 2020. He also serves as Chairman of the BoardNational Shooting Sports Foundation, or NSSF, and served from 2005 to 2008 on the board of directors of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute, or SAAMI. Mr. Scott served as a consultant to us (2004 to 2006); our President (1999 to 2002); Chairman of our wholly owned subsidiary, Smith & Wesson Corp. (2003); and President of Smith & Wesson Corp. (2001 to 2002). From 1989 to 1999, he served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing and later as Vice President of Business Development of Smith & Wesson Corp. prior to its acquisition by us. Prior to that, Mr. Scott served in senior positions with Berkley & Company and Tasco Sales Inc., two leading companies in the outdoor industry. He previously served as a director of Primos Hunting, a leader in the hunting category, and OPT Holdings, a hunting accessories marketer.

Anita D. BrittKey Qualifications and Skills Include:

57Director (1)(3)

   Executive. Our former President, VP of Sales and Marketing, and

VP of Business Development

   Regulated Industry/Government. Extensive leadership experience in

firearm and outdoor industries through affiliations with us, NSSF, SAAMI,

   Primos Hunting, and OPT Holdings

   Sales and Marketing. Our former VP of Sales and Marketing;

previously served in senior sales roles with Berkley and Tasco Sales

John B. FurmanMARK P. SMITH

76Director (1)(2)(3)

Barry M. MonheitAge:47

Director since:2020

Not Independent

Board committees:

• None

Other public company boards:

None

Other public company boards within five years:

None

73

Background:

Mr. Smith has served as our President and CEO and as a director since August 2020. Since joining us in 2010, he has served in a number of roles with increasing responsibility, including Vice President of Supply Chain Management (2010 to 2011), Vice President of Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management (2011 to 2016), President, Manufacturing Services (2016 to 2020), and Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer (January 2020 to August 2020). Prior to joining us, Mr. Smith served as Director (1)(2)Supply Chain Solutions for Alvarez & Marsal Business Consulting, LLC (2007 to 2010), in various positions with Ecolab, Inc. (2001 to 2007) and as a Production Supervisor for Bell Aromatics (1999 to 2001).

Mitchell A. SaltzKey Qualifications and Skills Include:

67Director

Mark P. Smith

44    Executive. Our President Chief Executive Officer, and Director

CEO

(1)

Member of the Compensation Committee.    Manufacturing. Extensive operations experience gained through roles with us,

(2)

Member of the Nominations  including as President, Manufacturing Services and Corporate Governance Committee.VP of

(3)

Member of the Audit Committee.    Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management, and Alvarez & Marsal

    Regulated Industry/Government. Extensive leadership experience in

  firearm industry through affiliation with us

Robert L. Scott has served as a director of our company since December 1999 and was appointed as Chairman of the Board on August 23, 2020. Mr. Scott is the Chairman of the National Shooting Sports Foundation and a Governor of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Institute. Mr. Scott served as a consultant to our company from May 2004 until February 2006; President of our company from December 1999 until September 2002; Chairman of our wholly owned subsidiary, Smith & Wesson Corp., from January 2003 through December 2003; and President of Smith & Wesson Corp. from May 2001 until December 2002. From December 1989 to December 1999, Mr. Scott served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing and later as Vice President of Business Development of Smith & Wesson Corp. prior to its acquisition by our company. Prior to joining Smith & Wesson Corp., Mr. Scott was employed for eight years in senior positions with Berkley & Company and Tasco Sales Inc., two leading companies in the outdoor industry. Mr. Scott previously served as a director and a member of the Compensation Committee of OPT Holdings, a private company marketing hunting accessories. We believe Mr. Scott’s prior extensive service with our company and his very extensive industry knowledge and expertise provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Michael F. Golden has served as a director of our company since December 2004 and was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board on August 23, 2020. Mr. Golden served as the President and

LOGO2020

8 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    7

img125871598_6.jpg 



  PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

Board and Governance Matters

Chief Executive Officer of our company from December 2004 until his retirement in September 2011. Mr. Golden served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Quest Resource Holding Corporation, a publicly traded environmental solutions company that serves as a single source provider of recycling and environment-related programs, services, and information, from October 2015 to February 2016. Mr. Golden has served on its board of directors since October 2012 and serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Strategic Planning Committee. Mr. Golden was employed in various executive positions with the Kohler Company from February 2002 until joining our company, with his most recent position being the President of its Cabinetry Division. Mr. Golden was the President of Sales for the Industrial/Construction Group of the Stanley Works Company from 1999 until 2002; Vice President of Sales for Kohler’s North American Plumbing Group from 1996 until 1998; and Vice President — Sales and Marketing for a division of The Black & Decker Corporation where he was employed from 1981 until 1996. Since February 2013, Mr. Golden has served as a member of the board of directors of Trex Company, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed manufacturer of high-performance wood-alternative decking and railing, and serves as a member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee. We believe Mr. Golden’s service as the former President and Chief Executive Officer of our company, his intimate knowledge and experience with all aspects of the operations, opportunities, and challenges of our company, and his long business career at major companies provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Anita D. Britt has served as a director of our company since February 2018. Ms. Britt served as Chief Financial Officer for Perry Ellis International, Inc., a publicly traded apparel company, from March 2009 until her retirement in March 2017. From August 2006 to February 2009, Ms. Britt served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Urban Brands, Inc., a privately held apparel company. From 1993 to 2006, Ms. Britt served in various positions, including that of Executive Vice President, Finance, for Jones Apparel Group, Inc., an apparel company. Ms. Britt has served as a member of the Board of Directors since 2018 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee of Delta Apparel, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed designer, manufacturer, and marketer of lifestyle basics and branded active wear apparel, headwear, and related accessory products. Ms. Britt previously served on the Board of Trustees and Finance Committee of St. Thomas University from April 2013 to January 2018 and as its Chief Financial Officer from January 2018 to March 2018. Ms. Britt is a Certified Public Accountant and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Ms Britt is also a Board Leadership Fellow, as designated by the National Association of Corporate Directors. We believe Ms. Britt’s extensive financial leadership at a number of public and private companies and her extensive experience with consumer-oriented companies provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience that make her well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

John B. Furman has served as a director of our company since April 2004. Since leaving the practice of law in August 1998, Mr. Furman has served as a consultant to or an executive of a number of companies, including serving as the chief executive officer of two public companies, with his focus being on restructurings, business transactions, capital formation, and product commercialization. From February 2009 until December 2009, Mr. Furman was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Infinity Resources LLC (now Quest Resource Holding Corporation), a privately held environmental solutions company that served as a single-source provider of recycling programs. Mr. Furman served as President and Chief Executive Officer of GameTech International, a publicly traded company involved in interactive bingo systems, from September 2004 until July 2005. Mr. Furman served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Rural/Metro Corporation, a publicly traded provider of emergency and fire protection services, from August 1998 until January 2000. Mr. Furman

DENIS G. SUGGS

8    

Age:57

Director since:2021

Independent

Board committees:

• Audit

• NCG

Other public company boards:

• Patrick Industries

Other public company boards within five years:

• None

    LOGOBackground:

Mr. Suggs has served as CEO of LCP Transportation LLC, a non-emergency medical transportation provider, since 2020. From 2014 to 2020, Proxy Statement

he served as President and CEO of Strategic Materials, Inc., a provider of environmental services. Mr. Suggs previously served in executive capacities with Belden, Inc., Danaher Corporation, and Public Storage Inc.


  PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

Key Qualifications and Skills Include:

   ESG. Experience as President and CEO of Strategic Materials, a leading glass

and plastics recycler, as well as through service on board of directors of Glass

   Packaging Institute, which focuses on sustainability issues

   Manufacturing. Extensive operations experience gained through service as

executive of Belden and Danaher

   Regulated Industry/Government. Experience as CEO of LCP Transportation,

which operates in a heavily regulated industry, as well as leading organizations

   that serve highly regulated sectors, such as aerospace and defense

was a senior member of the law firm of O’Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Killingsworth & Beshears, a professional association, from January 1983 until August 1998; he was Associate General Counsel of Waste Management, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange- listed provider of waste management services, from May 1977 until December 1983; and Vice President, Secretary, and General Counsel of the Warner Company, a New York Stock Exchange-listed company involved in industrial mineral extractions and processing, real estate development, and solid and chemical waste management, from November 1973 until April 1977. Mr. Furman previously served as a director and Chairman of the Compensation Committee of MarineMax, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed company that is the nation’s largest recreational boat dealer. We believe Mr. Furman’s experience as a chief executive officer and a consultant to multiple companies, his experience as a lawyer in private practice and for corporations, and his experience as a public company director provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Barry M. Monheit has served as a director of our company since February 2004, including as Chairman of the Board from October 2004 until the Separation when he became Chairman of the Board of AOUT. Mr. Monheit has served as Chairman of the Board of American Outdoor Brands, Inc., a publicly traded outdoor products and accessories company and our former subsidiary, since its spin-off from our company in August 2020. Mr. Monheit has been, since July 1, 2020, a Senior Managing Director of Simon Consulting, L.L.C., a consulting company providing services in forensic accounting, fraud investigations, receivership and restructuring, and lost profit examinations. Mr. Monheit has been, since December 2015, Vice Chairman of the Board of That’s Eatertainment Corp. (formerly Modern Round Entertainment Corporation), a company formed to create and roll out nationally an entertainment concept centered around a virtual interactive shooting experience utilizing laser technology-based replica firearms and extensive food and beverage offerings, and was a principal of its predecessor, Modern Round LLC, from February 2014 until December 2015. Mr. Monheit served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Quest Resource Holding Corporation, a publicly traded environmental solutions company that serves as a single-service provider of recycling and environment-related programs, services, and information, from June 2011 until July 2013 and served as a director of that company or its predecessors from June 2011 until July 2019. Mr. Monheit served as a financial and operational consultant from April 2010 until June 2011. From May 2009 until April 2010, Mr. Monheit was a Senior Managing Director of FTI Palladium Partners, a financial consulting division of FTI Consulting, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed global advisory firm dedicated to helping organizations protect and enhance enterprise value in an increasingly complex legal, regulatory, and economic environment. Mr. Monheit was a consultant focusing on financial and operational issues in the corporate restructuring field from January 2005 until May 2009. From July 1992 until January 2005, Mr. Monheit was associated in various capacities with FTI Consulting, Inc., serving as the President of its Financial Consulting Division from May 1999 through November 2001. Mr. Monheit was a partner with Arthur Andersen & Co. from August 1988 until July 1992, serving as partner-in-charge of its New York Consulting Division and partner-in-charge of its U.S. Bankruptcy and Reorganization Practice. We believe Mr. Monheit’s extensive experience in financial and operational consulting gained as an executive of major restructuring firms and his executive experience with major and emerging companies provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Mitchell A. Saltz has served as a director of our company since October 1998. Mr. Saltz has been, since December 2015, Chairman of the Board of That’s Eatertainment Corp. (formerly Modern Round Entertainment Corporation), a company formed to create and roll out nationally an entertainment concept centered around a virtual interactive shooting experience utilizing laser technology-based replica firearms and extensive food and beverage offerings, and was a principal of its predecessor, Modern Round LLC, from February 2014 until December 2015. Mr. Saltz has served

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        9


  PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

BOARD AND COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE

as the Chairman and Managing Partner of Southwest Capital Partners, an investment banking firm, since 2009. Since 2016, Mr. Saltz has served as a member of the board of directors, a member of the Audit Committee, Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of VirTra, Inc., a developer and seller of judgmental use-of-force training simulators and firearms training simulators for law enforcement, military, and commercial uses. Mr. Saltz served as the Chairman of Quest Resource Holding Corporation, a publicly traded environmental solutions company that serves as a single service provider of recycling and environment-related programs, services, and information, or its predecessors from 2005 until April 2019. Mr. Saltz served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of our company from February 1998 through December 2003. Mr. Saltz founded Saf-T-Hammer in 1997, which developed and marketed firearm safety and security products designed to prevent the unauthorized access to firearms, which acquired Smith & Wesson Corp. from Tomkins, PLC in May 2001 and changed its name to Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation. We believe Mr. Saltz’s history as a founder of our company, his service as a former officer of our company, and his financial, investment, and management experience provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Mark P. Smith has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of our company since August 2020. Mr. Smith served as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of our company from January 2020 until August 2020. Mr. Smith served as President, Manufacturing Services of our company and as President of Manufacturing Services for Smith & Wesson Sales Company (formerly known as American Outdoor Brands Sales Company and Smith & Wesson Corp.), a subsidiary of our company, from March 2016 until January 2020. Mr. Smith served as Vice President of Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management from May 2011 until March 2016 and served as Vice President of Supply Chain Management from May 2010 until May 2011. He was Director Supply Chain Solutions for Alvarez & Marsal Business Consulting, LLC from April 2007 until April 2010. Mr. Smith held various positions for Ecolab, Inc., a developer and marketer of programs, products, and services for the hospitality, foodservice, healthcare, industrial, and energy markets, from March 2001 until April 2007, including Program Manager, Acquisition Integration Manager, Senior Manufacturing Planner, Plant Engineer, and Senior Production / Quality Supervisor. Mr. Smith was a Production Supervisor for Bell Aromatics, a manufacturer of flavors and fragrances, from August 1999 until March 2001.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers.

10    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

Our Board of Directors has determined, after considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances, that Anita D. Britt, John B. Furman, Michael F. Golden, Barry M. Monheit, Mitchell A. Saltz, and Robert L. Scott are independent directors, as “independence” is defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq, and by the SEC, because they have no relationship with us that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as a director. Mark P. Smith is an employee director. P. James Debney, Gregory J. Gluchowski, Jr., and I. Marie Wadecki also served on our Board of Directors during fiscal 2020. Mr. Gluchowski and Ms. Wadecki resigned from our Board of Directors in August 2020 in connection with the Separation to join the Board of Directors of AOUT as provided for in the Separation, and Mr. Debney separated as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company in January 2020. Mr. Gluchowski and Ms. Wadecki were independent directors, as “independence” is defined by the listing standards of Nasdaq and by the SEC, because they had no relationship with us that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as a director. Mr. Debney was an employee director.

Committee Charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Codes of Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit, Compensation, and Nominations and Corporate Governance Committees describing the authority and responsibilities delegated to each committee by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Code of Conduct, and a Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers. We post on our website, at www.smith-wesson.com, the charters of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominations and Corporate Governance Committees; our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, and Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, and any amendments or waivers thereto; and any other corporate governance materials specified by SEC or Nasdaq regulations. These documents are also available in print to any stockholder requesting a copy in writing from our Secretary at the address of our executive offices set forth in this proxy statement.

Policy on Corporate Political Contributions and Expenditures

In 2014, our Board of Directors adopted a Policy on Corporate Political Contributions and Expenditures which is posted on our website at www.smith-wesson.com. In accordance with this policy, for each fiscal year beginning in 2015, we have posted on our website during the applicable fiscal year an annual report disclosing all political contributions or expenditures in the United States that are not deductible as “ordinary and necessary” business expenses under Section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code in excess of $50,000. Non-deductible amounts generally include contributions to or expenditures in support of or opposition to political candidates, political parties, or political committees.

Executive Sessions

We regularly schedule executive sessions in which independent directors meet without the presence or participation of management. The Chairman of our Board of Directors serves as the presiding director of such executive sessions.

Board Committees

Our bylaws authorize our Board of Directors to appoint from among its members one or more committees consisting of one or more directors. Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee,

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        11


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

each consisting entirely of independent directors as “independence” is defined by the listing standards of Nasdaq and by the SEC.

The Audit Committee

The purpose of the Audit Committee includes overseeing the financial and reporting processes of our company and the audits of the financial statements of our company and providing assistance to our Board of Directors with respect to its oversight of the integrity of the financial statements of our company, our company’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters, the independent registered public accountant’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of our company’s independent registered public accountant. The primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter and include various matters with respect to the oversight of our company’s accounting and financial reporting process and audits of the financial statements of our company on behalf of our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee also selects the independent registered public accountant to conduct the annual audit of the financial statements of our company; reviews the proposed scope of such audit; reviews accounting and financial controls of our company with the independent registered public accountant and our financial accounting staff; and reviews and approves any transactions between us and our directors, officers, and their affiliates, also referred to as related-person transactions.

The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Furman and Scott and Ms. Britt. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Furman and Scott and Ms. Britt, whose backgrounds are described above, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Ms. Britt chairs the Audit Committee. During fiscal 2020, Ms. Wadecki also served on the Audit Committee before joining the Board of Directors of AOUT.

The Compensation Committee

The purpose of the Compensation Committee includes determining, or, when appropriate, recommending to our Board of Directors for determination, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of our company and discharging the responsibilities of our Board of Directors relating to compensation programs of our company. The Compensation Committee currently makes all decisions with respect to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Furman and Monheit and Ms. Britt with Mr. Monheit serving as the Chair. During fiscal 2020, Mr. Gluchowski and Ms. Wadecki also served on the Compensation Committee before joining the Board of Directors of AOUT, and Mr. Furman served as chair of the Compensation Committee, until the Separation.

The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee

The purpose of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee includes the selection or recommendation to our Board of Directors of nominees to stand for election as directors at each election of directors, the oversight of the selection and composition of committees of our Board of Directors, the oversight of the evaluations of our Board of Directors and management, and the development and recommendation to our Board of Directors of corporate governance principles applicable to our company. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Monheit, Scott, and Furman. Mr. Furman chairs the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee. During fiscal 2020, Mr. Gluchowski and Ms. Wadecki also served on the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee, with Ms. Wadecki serving as the chair, before joining the Board of Directors of AOUT.

The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee will consider persons recommended by stockholders for inclusion as nominees for election to our Board of Directors if the information

12    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

required by our bylaws is submitted in writing in a timely manner addressed and delivered to our Secretary at the address of our executive offices set forth in this proxy statement. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates nominees for our Board of Directors, including nominees recommended by stockholders, based on numerous factors it considers appropriate, some of which may include strength of character, mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical skills, diversity, and the extent to which the nominee would fill a present need on our Board of Directors.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

We have assessed the compensation policies and practices with respect to our employees, including our executive officers, and have concluded that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

RiskThe Board recognizes that risk is inherent in every business. As is the case in virtually all businesses, the Board recognizes that we face a number of risks, including operational, economic, financial, cybersecurity, legal, regulatory, and competitive risks. OurWhile our management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face. Ourface, the Board, of Directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibilityis responsible for the oversight of risk management.

In its oversight role, our Board of Directors’

The Board’s involvement in our business strategy and strategic plans plays a key role in its oversight of risk management, its assessment of management’s risk appetite, and its determination of the appropriate level of enterprise risk. OurThe Board of Directors receives updates at least quarterly from senior management and periodically from outside advisors regarding the various risks we face, including operational, economic, financial, cybersecurity, legal, regulatory, and competitive risks. OurThe Board of Directors also reviews the various risks we identify in our SEC filings, with the SEC as well as risks relating to various specific developments, such as acquisitions, securities repurchases, debt and equity placements, andnew product introductions. In addition, ourthe Board of Directors regularly receives reports from senior members of our Manager of Internal ControlsAudit function and Assurance, our General Counsel and our Chief Compliance Officer.

Our board committees assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight role in certain areas of risk. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee oversees the financial and reporting processes of our company and the audit of the financial statements of our company and provides assistance to our Board of Directors with respect to the oversight and integrity of the financial statements of our company, our company’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters, the independent registered public accountant’s qualification and independence, and the performance of our independent registered public accountant. The Compensation Committee considers the risk that our compensation policies and practices may have in attracting, retaining, and motivating valued employees and endeavors to assure that it is not reasonably likely that our compensation plans and policies would have a material adverse effect on our company. Our Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee oversees governance related risk, such as board independence, conflicts of interest of members of the Board of Directors and executive officers, and management and succession planning.

See Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2023 (the “Form 10-K”) to learn more about the risks we face. The risks described in the Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that may currently be deemed to be immaterial based on the information known to us also may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Governance Spotlight

In fiscal 2023, we formalized a process whereby our Audit Committee Chair communicates directly with our Chief Compliance Officer at least quarterly in order to enhance the Board’s oversight of risk and the independence of our compliance function.

Given the nature of our business, the Board remains focused on overseeing risk management. During fiscal 2023, the ESG Committee discussed the campaign against the firearm industry at each of its meetings and the full Board reviewed an updated report prepared by a third-party media monitoring firm that we have worked with for several years.

Board Diversity

9 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

We seek diversity in experience, viewpoint, education, skill, and other individual qualities and attributes to be represented on our Board of Directors. We believe directors should have various

LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement    

    13


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

AUDIT COMMITTEE

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Oversees our financial and reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements

Assists the Board with respect to:

- the oversight and integrity of our financial statements

- our compliance with legal and regulatory matters

- our policies and practices related to information security, including cybersecurity

- the independent registered public accountant’s qualification and independence

- the performance of the independent registered public accountant

Meets separately on a regular basis with representatives of our independent registered public accountant and our internal audit function

Considers the risk that our compensation policies and practices may have in attracting, retaining, and motivating valued employees

Endeavors to ensure that it is not reasonably likely that our compensation plans and policies would have a material adverse effect on us

NCG COMMITTEE

Oversees governance-related risk, such as board independence, conflicts of interest, and management and succession planning

ESG COMMITTEE

Reviews emerging risks associated with ESG matters

Cybersecurity Risk Oversight. We recognize the importance of cybersecurity risk governance. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management on, among other things, the emerging cybersecurity threat landscape and our cybersecurity risks and threats. The Audit Committee regularly briefs the full Board on these matters. We maintain a Cyber Incident Response Plan.

qualifications, including individual character and integrity; business experience; leadership ability; strategic planning skills, ability, and experience; requisite knowledge of our industry and finance, accounting, and legal matters; communications and interpersonal skills; and

ESG Risk Oversight. We recognize the ability and willingness to devote timeimportance to our company. We also believestakeholders of ESG matters. Since 2021, the skill sets, backgrounds,ESG Committee has assisted the Board and qualifications of our directors, taken as a whole, should provide a significant mix of diversityits committees in personalfulfilling the Board’s oversight responsibilities with various environmental, social, health, safety, and professional experience, background, viewpoints, perspectives, knowledge,governance policies and abilities. Nominees are notoperational control matters relevant to be discriminated against onus. In part, the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability, or any other basis proscribed by law. The assessment of prospective directors is made in the context of the perceived needs of our Board of Directors from time to time.ESG Committee reviews emerging risks and opportunities associated with ESG matters.

All of our directors have held senior-level positions in business or professional service firms and have experience in dealing with complex issues. We believe that all of our directors are individuals of high character and integrity, are able to work well with others, and have committed to devote sufficient time to the business and affairs of our company. In addition to these attributes, the description of each director’s background set forth above indicates the specific qualifications, skills, perspectives, and experience necessary to conclude that each individual should continue to serve as a director of our company.

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that effective board leadership structure can depend on the experience, skills, and personal interaction between persons in leadership roles as well as the needs of our company at any point in time. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines support flexibility in the structure of ourthe Board of Directors by not requiring the separation of the roles of Chief Executive OfficerCEO and Chairman of the Board.

Chairman. We currently maintain separate roles between the Chief Executive Officerour CEO and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two responsibilities. Our Chief Executive Officerresponsibilities of these roles. The Board believes this leadership structure is responsiblethe most effective for settingus at this time because it allows our strategic directionCEO to focus on running our business and day-to-day leadership and performanceour Chairman to focus on pursuing sound governance practices that benefit the long-term interests of our company. stockholders.

Board Committees

The ChairmanBoard has four standing committees, each of which is comprised of independent directors: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the NCG Committee, and the ESG Committee.

10 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Members:

Anita Britt (Chair)

John Furman (1)

Bob Scott

Denis Suggs

Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 5

Member Independence: 4 of 4

* All members meet the independence requirements of Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that each member is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations.

Purpose:

Overseeing our financial and reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements.

Providing assistance to the Board with respect to its oversight of:

- the integrity of our financial statements

- our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

- the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence

- the performance of our internal audit function, if any, and independent auditor

- our policies and practices related to information security, including cyber security, protection of personally identifiable information, and training of employees around such items

Preparing the report that SEC rules require be included in our annual proxy statement.

Principal Responsibilities:

Appointing, retaining, compensating, evaluating, and terminating any accounting firm engaged to prepare or issue an audit report or performing other audit, review, or attest services, and overseeing the work of such firm.

Overseeing our accounting and financial reporting process and audits of our financial statements.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Members:

Barry Monheit (Chair)

Anita Britt

Fred Diaz

John Furman (1)

Michelle Lohmeier(2)

Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 6

Member Independence: 5 of 5

* All members meet the independence requirements of Nasdaq and qualify as “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3(b)(3)(i) of the Exchange Act.

Purpose:

Determining, or recommending to the Board for determination, the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers.

Discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to our compensation programs and compensation of our executives.

Producing an annual compensation committee report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual proxy statement.

Principal Responsibilities:

Setting compensation for executive officers and directors.

Monitoring incentive- and equity-based compensation plans.

Appointing, compensating, and overseeing the work of any compensation consultant, legal counsel, and other retained advisor.

11 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

NCG COMMITTEE

Members:

Denis Suggs (Chair)

John Furman (1)

Barry Monheit

Bob Scott

Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 6

Member Independence: 4 of 4

* All members meet the independence requirements of Nasdaq.

Purpose:

Selecting, or recommending to the Board for selection, the individuals to stand for election as directors at each election of directors.

Overseeing the selection and composition of Board committees and, as applicable, overseeing management continuity planning processes.

Principal Responsibilities:

Developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to us.

Overseeing the evaluation of the Board and management.

 Developing and maintaining the Skills Matrix

   ESG COMMITTEE

Members:

Fred Diaz (Chair)

Anita Britt

Michael F. Golden(3)

Michelle Lohmeier(2)

Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 4

Member Independence: 4 of 4

Purpose:

Assisting the Board and its committees in fulfilling the oversight responsibilities of the Board with various environmental, social, health, safety, and governance policies and operational control matters relevant to us.

Principal Responsibilities:

Reviewing the status and effectiveness of our ESG performance, metrics, and goals.

Reviewing emerging risks and opportunities associated with ESG.

Assessing whether to adopt ESG goals, metrics, and targets, and adopting such goals, metrics, and targets, if deemed appropriate.

(1)
Mr. Furman is a current director and member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the NCG Committee. He was not nominated for election at the 2023 Annual Meeting due to his anticipated retirement.
(2)
Ms. Lohmeier joined the Board in July 2023.
(3)
Mr. Golden passed away in June 2023. He served as Chair of the ESG Committee prior to his death.

Meeting Attendance in Fiscal 2023

In fiscal 2023, the Board held seven meetings and its committees held a combined total of 21 meetings. Each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served. We encourage our directors to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All directors attended the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Executive Sessions

We regularly schedule executive sessions in which independent directors meet without the presence or participation of management. Our Chairman serves as the presiding director of these executive sessions during Board meetings, and our committee chairs preside at the sessions held during committee meetings.

12 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

Stockholder Engagement

We meet with investors throughout the year and consider investor feedback on emerging issues, which allows us to better understand their priorities and perspectives. This year-round engagement provides us with useful input and enables us to consider developments proactively. In addition, from time to time, we conduct stockholder outreach programs. Prior to the Chief Executive Officer, sets2022 Annual Meeting, we requested meetings with the agendacorporate governance teams at stockholders representing approximately 46% of our outstanding shares, as a result of which we engaged with teams at stockholders representing approximately 27% of our outstanding shares. We primarily discussed the stockholder proposals that were included in our proxy materials for boardthe 2022 Annual Meeting. In early 2023, we requested meetings with the corporate governance teams at stockholders representing 44% of our outstanding shares, as a result of which we engaged with teams at stockholders representing 10% of our outstanding shares. We used these meetings to, among other things, discuss progress we had made on topics of importance to our stockholders, including Board refreshment, and presides oversolicit our investors’ views on the right of stockholders to call special meetings (see Proposals 5 and 7) and our exclusive forum bylaw provision (see Proposal 6).

Responding to Stockholder Engagement. We value the feedback that we receive from our investors and seek opportunities to respond to their feedback, when appropriate. For example, in response to feedback we received in recent years from many of our largest stockholders, we have expanded our public disclosures both in SEC-filed documents and through the publication of other relevant documents. In 2022, we published our first Firearm Market Factsheet, which was intended to increase transparency around our business practices by, among other things, describing our go-to-market approach to both domestic and international sales and highlighting our commitment to promoting responsible firearm ownership. In 2022, we also published our second Environmental Factsheet, which, among other things, highlighted our commitment to responsible environmental practices, described our approach to environmental management, and listed a number of environmental impact highlights. Copies of the Firearm Market Factsheet and the Environmental Factsheet are available on our website, www.smith-wesson.com. The information on our website is not part of this Proxy Statement.

In response to requests from certain of our stockholders for more detailed information concerning our directors’ qualifications, in fiscal 2023, the NCG Committee developed and adopted the Skills Matrix.

In addition to engaging with our largest stockholders, we have devoted significant resources in recent years engaging with the proponent for Proposal 8. We spoke directly to the proponent on three occasions in 2022 and once in 2023. Each discussion was conducted in a respectful manner, and we came away with a better understanding of the proponent’s positions regarding gun control generally and its stockholder proposal specifically. During fiscal 2023, we also met with a representative of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System.

Governance Spotlight

We spoke directly with the proponent for Proposal 8 on four occasions in the last two years in order to better understand the proponent’s views and objectives.

13 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Board and Governance Matters

ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Certain Relationships

Unless delegated to the Compensation Committee by the Board, the Audit Committee charter requires the Audit Committee to review and approve all related party transactions and to review and make recommendations to the full Board, or approve, any contracts or other transactions with any of Directors as well asour current or former executive sessionsofficers, including consulting arrangements, employment agreements, change-in-control agreements, termination arrangements, and loans to employees made or guaranteed by us. We have a policy that we will not enter into any such transaction unless the transaction is determined by our disinterested directors to be fair to us or is approved by our disinterested directors or by our stockholders. Any determination by our disinterested directors is based on a review of the particular transaction, applicable laws and regulations, our policies, and the Nasdaq listing standards. As appropriate, the disinterested directors of the applicable committees of the Board will consult with our legal counsel or internal auditor. There was no transaction during fiscal 2023, and there are no currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant in which an executive officer, director, director nominee, a beneficial owner of Directors.5% or more of our common stock, or any immediate family members of such persons had or will have a direct material interest.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

Clawback Policy

We maintain a compensation recovery, or clawback, policy. See “Compensation Matters – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Additional Compensation Matters – Clawback Policy” for more information.

Communicating with the Board

Stockholders may communicate with the Board or specific directors, including our independent directors and the members of our board committees, by submitting a letter addressed to the Board of Directors of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., c/o any specified individual director or directors, at our principal executive offices.

Corporate Political Contributions and Expenditures

We have a policy to post on our website each fiscal year an annual report disclosing all political contributions or expenditures in the United States in excess of $50,000 that are not deductible as “ordinary and necessary” business expenses under Section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the "Code"). Non-deductible amounts generally include contributions to or expenditures in support of or opposition to political candidates, political parties, or political committees.

Corporate Stewardship Policy

We have a policy, pursuant to which, in order to meet our objective of being a good corporate steward, we consider, among other things, our responsibilities with respect to employee, safety, and governance risks, including the risks caused by the unlawful or improper use of firearms.

Director and Officer Derivative Trading and Hedging

We have a policy prohibiting our directors and officers, including our executive officers, and any family member residing in the same household, from engaging in derivatives trading and hedging involving our securities or pledging or margining our common stock.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors and executive officers. Our non-employee directors and executive officers are required to own shares of our common stock or share equivalents with a value equal to at least the lesser of the following:

·   Non-Employee Directors

Three times cash retainer or 21,000 shares or share equivalents

·   Chief Executive Officer

Three times base salary or 161,000 shares or share equivalents

·   Chief Financial Officer

Two times base salary or 34,000 shares or share equivalents

·   Other Executive Officers

Two times base salary or 26,000 shares or share equivalents

14    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Each individual has five years from the later of the date of adoption of these guidelines or the date of appointment of the individual as a director or an executive officer to achieve the required ownership levels. We believe that these guidelines promote the alignment of the long-term interests of our executive officers and members of our Board of Directors with our stockholders.

Stock ownership generally includes the shares directly owned by the individual (including any shares over which the individual has sole ownership, voting, or investment power); the number of shares owned by the individual’s minor children and spouse and by other related individuals and entities over whose shares the individual has custody, voting control, or power of disposition; shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable or will be vested and deliverable within 60 days; shares underlying PSUs that have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days if the performance requirements have been satisfied; shares underlying stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days; and shares held in trust for the benefit of the individual or the individual’s immediate family members.

If an individual achieves the required ownership level on the first day of any fiscal year, the value of the individual’s stock ownership on that date will be converted into a number of shares to be maintained in the future by dividing the value of such stock ownership by the price of our common stock on the prior day, which is the last day of the preceding fiscal year.

The failure to satisfy the required ownership level may result in the ineligibility of the individual to receive stock-based compensation in the case of an executive officer or director or the inability to be a nominee for election to the Board of Directors in the case of a director.

Clawback Policy

We maintain a compensation recovery, or clawback, policy. In the event we are required to prepare an accounting restatement of our financial results as a result of a material noncompliance by us with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, we will have the right to use reasonable efforts to recover from any current or former executive officers who received incentive compensation (whether cash or equity) from us during the three-year period preceding the date on which we were required to prepare the accounting restatement, any excess incentive compensation awarded as a result of the misstatement. This policy is administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Once final rules are adopted by the SEC regarding clawback requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, we will review this policy and make any amendments necessary to comply with the new rules.

Corporate Stewardship Policy

We maintain a Corporate Stewardship Policy. In accordance with this policy, to meet our objective of being a good corporate steward, we take into account our responsibilities with respect to (i) employee, safety, and governance risks, including the risks caused by the unlawful or improper use of firearms, and (ii) preserving the right to bear arms enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

Whistleblower Policy

We maintainhave a Whistleblower Policypolicy covering the policies and procedures for (i) the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints that we receive regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters;matters, and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

LOGO2020

14 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    15

img125871598_6.jpg 



  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Board and Governance Matters

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee, Interlockswith advice from its independent compensation consultant, determines, or recommends to the Board for determination, the compensation of our directors. We pay each non-employee director an annual retainer in the amount of $70,000. We also pay additional sums to our Chairman, Vice Chairman, Chairs of our committees, and Insider Participationmembers of our committees as follows:

During

Chairman

 

$

62,500

 

 

Vice Chairman

 

$

23,000

 

(1)

Chair, Audit Committee

 

$

25,000

 

 

Chair, Compensation Committee

 

$

25,000

 

 

Chair, NCG Committee

 

$

25,000

 

 

Chair, ESG Committee

 

$

25,000

 

 

Non-Chair Audit Committee Members

 

$

8,000

 

 

Non-Chair Compensation Committee Members

 

$

5,000

 

 

Non-Chair NCG Committee Members

 

$

5,000

 

 

Non-Chair ESG Committee Members

 

$

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) In June 2023, we eliminated the role of Vice Chairman.

Each committee member receives an additional $1,500 per committee meeting attended in excess of seven meetings per year (for the Audit Committee), in excess of six meetings per year (for the Compensation Committee), in excess of four meetings per year (for the NCG Committee), and in excess of four meetings per year (for the ESG Committee).

We reimburse directors for travel and related expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Mr. Smith receives no additional compensation for his service as a director.

Each non-employee director receives a stock-based grant to acquire shares of our fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, Messrs. Furman, Gluchowski, and Monheit and Ms. Wadecki servedcommon stock on the Compensation Committee. Nonedate of these individuals had any material contractualhis or other relationships with us during such fiscal year except as directors. During our fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, none of our executive officers served onher first appointment or election to the compensation committee or board of directors of any entity whose executive officers serve asBoard. Each non-employee director also receives a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

Board and Committee Meetings

Our Board of Directors held a total of 21 meetings duringstock-based grant at the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, the Audit Committee held five meetings; the Compensation Committee held 11 meetings; and the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee held seven meetings. No director attended fewer than 75%meeting of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our Board of Directors, and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our Board of Directors on which he or she was a member.

Annual Meeting Attendance

We encourage each of our directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. To that end, and to the extent reasonably practicable, we regularly schedule a meeting of our Board of Directors on the same day asimmediately following our annual meeting of stockholders. Allstockholders for that year. Stock-based grants were in the form of our then current directors attended our 2019 Annual Meetingrestricted stock units (“RSUs”) for 8,071 shares of Stockholders.common stock in fiscal 2023. The RSUs vest one-twelfth each month after the grant.

Majority Voting

The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us to each non-employee director for Directorsfiscal 2023.

We have a director resignation policy that provides that any incumbent director who does not receive the requisite majority

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees Earned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or Paid in

 

 

Stock

 

 

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

Name (1)

 

Cash

 

 

Awards (2)

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

Total

 

Anita D. Britt

 

$

105,000

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

2,352

 

(4)

 

$

207,352

 

Fred M. Diaz

 

$

77,211

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

2,513

 

(4)

 

$

179,724

 

John B. Furman (3)

 

$

96,333

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

196,333

 

Michael F. Golden (3)

 

$

118,000

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

337

 

(5)

 

$

218,337

 

Barry M. Monheit

 

$

100,000

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

1,525

 

(6)

 

$

201,525

 

Robert L. Scott

 

$

145,500

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

29,867

 

(6)

 

$

275,367

 

Mark P. Smith

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

Denis G. Suggs

 

$

94,667

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

194,667

 

(1)
As of votes cast in an uncontested election is expected to submit his or her offer of resignation to our Board of Directors. For more detailed information regarding this policy see “Voting and Other Matters — Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions.”

Proxy Access

In April 2019, we amended our Amended and Restated Bylaws to implement “proxy access,” a means for our stockholders to include stockholder-nominated director candidates in our proxy materials for annual meetings of stockholders. A stockholder, or group of not more than 20 stockholders, that meet specific eligibility requirements are generally permitted to nominate the greater of (i) two director nominees or (ii) 20%30, 2023, each of the totalnon-employee directors had the following number of stock awards outstanding, which represent undelivered shares underlying vested RSUs: Mr. Monheit 7,708; Mr. Scott 7,708; Ms. Britt 4,708; Mr. Furman 4,708; Mr. Golden 4,708; Mr. Diaz 4,708; and Mr. Suggs 4,708. As of April 30, 2023, there were no stock options outstanding for the directors.

(2)
The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value for stock awards granted to the directors calculated in office ataccordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. The assumptions used in determining the deadline for proxy access nominations. In order to be eligible to use the proxy access process, an eligible stockholder must, among other requirements, have owned 3% or moregrant date fair value of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years. Use of the proxy access process to submit stockholder nominees is subject to additional eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements asthese awards are set forth in Note 13 to our Amendedconsolidated financial statements, which are included in the Form 10-K.
(3)
Mr. Furman is retiring effective at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Mr. Golden passed away in June 2023.
(4)
Consists of costs for certain products provided without cost.
(5)
Consists of spousal travel.
(6)
Consists of costs for certain products provided without cost and Restated Bylaws.spousal travel.
(7)
Consists of reimbursement of medical coverage costs, costs for certain products provided without cost and spousal travel.

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers. See “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Additional Compensation Matters — Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements.”

Investor Engagement

15 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Our relationship with our stockholders is an important part of our corporate governance commitment. We meet with a broad base of investors throughout the year to discuss strategy and other importantcompensation matters including executive compensation. We consider investor feedback on emerging issues, which allows us to better understand our stockholders’ priorities and perspectives. This year-round engagement process provides us with useful input concerning our corporate strategy and enables us to consider developments proactively and to act responsibly. During the solicitation for

16    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we reached out to stockholders holding approximately 63% of our outstanding shares and had discussions with stockholders holding approximately 34% of our outstanding shares. During our offseason outreach, we reached out on two separate occasions to stockholders holding approximately 21% of our outstanding shares and met with stockholders representing approximately 19% of our outstanding shares regarding the stockholder proposal rejected by stockholders at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and other important matters.

Communications with Directors

Interested parties may communicate with our Board of Directors or specific members of our Board of Directors, including our independent directors and the members of our various board committees, by submitting a letter addressed to the Board of Directors of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., c/o any specified individual director or directors, at the address of our executive offices set forth in this proxy statement. Any such letters are sent to the indicated directors.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        17


COMPENSATION  DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program, outlines the core principles behind that program, and reviews the actions taken by our Compensation Committee concerning the fiscal 2020 compensation of the executive officers named in the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table below, or the named executive officers. These named executive officers are as follows:

Mark P. SmithPROPOSAL TWO – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer from January 15, 2020 through April 30, 2020; Senior Vice President, Manufacturing Services division from May 1, 2019 until January 14, 2020

Brian D. Murphy

Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer from January 15, 2020 through April 30, 2020; President, Outdoor Products & Accessories division from May 1, 2019 until January 14, 2020

P. James Debney

President and Chief Executive Officer from May 1, 2019 until his separationWhat Am I Voting On? The Board is asking our stockholders to approve, on January 14, 2020

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, and Treasurer

Robert J. Cicero

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary

Lane Tobiassen

President, Firearm division

Effective January 14, 2020, Mr. Debney separated from the company and its subsidiaries as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director. Effective January 15, 2020, Messrs. Smith and Murphy were appointed Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers.

Executive Summary

2019 Say-on-Pay Vote

The holders of approximately 63% of our stock voted at our last annual meeting of stockholders against our say-on-pay proposal foran advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.

Stockholder Outreach

·

We contacted stockholders holding approximately 63% of our outstanding shares and had discussions with stockholders holding approximately 34%NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement

Voting Recommendation:FORthe proposal

Vote Required: The affirmative vote of our outstanding shares duringa majority of the solicitation for our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.votes cast is required to approve the proposal

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

·

In addition, we reached out on two separate occasions to stockholders holding approximately 21% of our outstanding shares and met with stockholders holding approximately 19% of our outstanding shares regarding the stockholder proposal rejected by stockholders at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and other important matters.

18    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

·

Stockholder outreach raised questions about setting performance targets for our bonus plan lower than the performance targets or performance for the prior year, the level of maximum payout at 300% of target, and whether the maximum payouts of 300% would be limited to exceptional company performance.

ResponsePursuant to Stockholder Feedback

·

In considering our stockholder feedback, our Compensation Committee noted that our company is in a very cyclical business in which there can be periods of several years when revenue and profitability may be significantly decreasing. Despite the medium-term decrease, management often successfully executes on our business strategy by managing the business well during the decline in demand while also preserving our ability to ramp up production when the demand cycle picks up again. Therefore, judging bonus payouts mechanically in comparison to prior year results does not always reflect on management’s success in running the business through our sales cycles.

·

The Compensation Committee also considered the appropriateness of a 300% maximum bonus payout. The Compensation Committee noted that the original purpose of the 300% maximum bonus potential was to address years in which there was an unforecasted surge in revenue in order to provide management an incentive to take advantage of the market demand. After reflecting on the Compensation Committee’s experience in designing the bonus plan over the past few years, the Compensation Committee determined to reduce the maximum bonus potential from 300% to 200% to align with market norms. While this reduces the maximum potential bonus in years of a demand surge, such a surge usually is also reflected in stock prices and would therefore reward executives through an increase in the value of their equity awards and the performance of their relative total shareholder return performance awards.

·

Prior to the results of the 2019 say-on-pay vote and therefore the Compensation Committee’s consideration of stockholder feedback on the fiscal 2019 say-on-pay vote, the Compensation Committee had to determine the design and performance goals for the fiscal 2020 bonus plan. This is due a timing issue faced by most companies. The annual stockholder meeting at which the 2019 say-on-pay occurred was mid-way through our 2020 fiscal year, which was after the date we needed to set the annual fiscal 2020 bonus plan goals. Despite the timing, based on its understanding of our forecasted financial performance for fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee set the target payout in the fiscal 2020 plan to be above that for fiscal 2019. This change was in total alignment with the feedback we later received from our stockholders and our stockholders’ advisory firms. In addition, the Compensation Committee substantially increased the financial performance metric for revenue that was necessary to receive an above target payout, including doubling the percent increase over target for a maximum payout.

·

In determining the design of our fiscal 2021 incentive plan, which was decided after the negative say-on-pay vote, in addition to again setting the target performance metrics above the prior year’s performance, the Compensation Committee also reduced the maximum payout for our fiscal 2021 bonus plan from 300% of target to 200% of target.

·

We believe we have satisfactorily responded to stockholder feedback as was our goal.

Fiscal 2020 Financial Results

·

Consolidated net sales increased 6.3% over the prior fiscal year.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        19


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

·

Adjusted EBITDAS increased 4.3% over the prior fiscal year.

·

Year-end net bank borrowings were reduced by $80.9 million from the prior fiscal year end.

·

Unlike the case for many companies during the COVID-19 pandemic, our management team was able to keep our entire business operating due to the implementation and follow through on a broad range of safety and cleaning procedures, which were implemented early and aggressively to significantly reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission and keep our employees safe.

Financial results were achieved despite the substantial management time and attention devoted to the Separation.

Compensation Highlights

·

Our former President and Chief Executive Officer did not receive a base salary increase for fiscal 2020.

·

Our other named executive officers received base salary increases ranging from 3% to 10% at the beginning of the fiscal year as is our practice apart from the base salary increases for our two new Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers upon assuming their positions in January 2020 in recognition of their increased responsibilities.

·

Named executive officer cash incentive compensation as a percentage of target cash bonus opportunity ranged from 0% in the case of former President and Chief Executive Officer to more than 90% in the case of our other named executive officers.

·

The PSUs granted in fiscal 2017 to our executive officers, which had a three-year performance period-ended May 1, 2020, were not earned because our stock price did not meet the threshold performance requirements.

Highlights of Fiscal 2020 Compensation Program

Despite facing an environment characterized by very challenging industry conditions, especially for the firearm industry, the Compensation Committee increased the fiscal 2020 financial performance metrics for the annual cash incentive bonus relative to the prior year. The fiscal 2020 metrics were established to provide the executive officers with objectives that were difficult, but attainable, in order to motivate and incentivize them to drive increases of net sales and Adjusted EBITDAS over the prior year’s results. While challenging conditions across the industry did, in fact, continue throughout most of fiscal 2020, the executive officers drove our company to deliver a strong performance, increasing net sales and Adjusted EBITDAS for fiscal 2020. Given these positive results, the Compensation Committee believes it is important to continue to incentivize and retain our executive officers on a pay-for-performance basis with compensation programs similar to previous years with objective financial metrics that take into account the business, social, political, and corporate environment in which our company operates consistent with our compensation philosophy of pay-for-performance and executive retention.

The following highlights aspects of our fiscal 2020 compensation program:

·

Base Salary As it has done in the past, the Compensation Committee in April 2019, with advice from its independent compensation consultant, reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers compared with competitive market data. As a result of this review, the Compensation Committee increased the base salaries of Messrs. Smith, Buchanan, and Cicero by 3.0%, Mr. Murphy by 8.0%, and Mr. Tobiassen by 10%, effective May 1,

20    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

2019. Our former President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Debney, did not receive any increase in his base salary. Following Mr. Debney’s separation from our company, upon their appointment as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers in January 2020, the annual base salaries of Messrs. Smith and Murphy were each increased to $500,000, increases of 40.0% and 58.7%, respectively.

·

Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses Our Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program for fiscal 2020 continued, as in the past, to focus on the achievement of objective annual financial goals, specifically, net sales and Adjusted EBITDAS. Named executive officer cash incentive compensation as a percentage of target cash bonuses ranged from 0% in the case of our former Present and Chief Executive Officer to more than 90% for our other named executive officers. Our bonus plan considered the difficult and unpredictable environment for our businesses, particularly our firearm and firearm-related business, and the lack of control that our management has over external, social, political, and economic factors that impact our company, when setting the financial performance goals at the beginning of the 2020 fiscal year. In accordance with the pay-for-performance philosophy of the Compensation Committee, each of our named executive officers other than our former Chief Executive Officer was awarded a cash incentive bonus based on outstanding financial performance and the achievement of the prior established targets under our fiscal 2020 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program. This contrasts with two of the five prior fiscal years, including fiscal 2018 when none of our executive officers received cash incentive bonuses for company-wide or division financial performance because we did not achieve our pre-established company-wide or division financial performance targets under the cash incentive programs.

·

Long-Term Incentive Compensation As in the past and recognizing potential retention issues caused by firearm and firearm-related industry factors beyond the control of management as well as the need to build out the management team of our outdoor products and accessories business, the stock-based awards granted to our executive officers in fiscal 2020 consisted of an mix of service-based restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based RSUs, or PSUs. The RSUs vest one-fourth on May 1 following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. The number of shares of common stock, if any, to be delivered under the PSUs depends on the relative performance of our common stock compared with the performance of the RUT with a target payout requiring performance to be equal to or higher than the RUT over the three-year performance period. Reflecting our pay-for-performance philosophy, no shares were distributed under the PSUs granted in fiscal 2017 for the three-year performance period ended May 1, 2020 since the stock-market performance criteria were not achieved.

·

Stock Retention Requirements For stockholder alignment and to encourage long-term focus, the Compensation Committee maintained for fiscal 2020 stock holding requirements for the shares underlying outstanding stock-based awards granted to our directors and executive officers so that vested shares generally will not be delivered and therefore, at a minimum, cannot be sold until the first anniversary of the vesting date for all shares underlying each award.

·

Independent Competitive Market Analysis As in the past, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant assisted the Compensation Committee by providing a market analysis of executive compensation as well as updating the committee on current trends and developments in executive compensation.

·

Focus on Performance We increased both the revenue and Adjusted EBITDA metrics for our company as a whole as well as for the firearm and outdoor products divisions for

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        21


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

fiscal 2020 despite concerns about soft demand for firearms and firearm-related products, and we reduced the maximum payout for fiscal 2021 from 300% of target to 200%.

Our Compensation Committee believes that, in the context of the various factors facing the primary industry in which we operate, our executive compensation program continues to illustrate our company’s strong commitment to align pay with performance. In light of our operational accomplishments and taking into consideration potential management retention issues in a difficult market environment as well as the Compensation Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the Compensation Committee recommends thatSEC rules, our stockholders vote “FOR” this year’s resolutionare being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2020NEOs as describeddisclosed in this Proxy Statement. Our recommendation is particularly strong givenWe have recently received high levels of support from our management’s performance during fiscal 2020 despite the onset of COVID-19 pandemic that closed down the operations of many companies. Our management team was ablestockholders on advisory votes to keep our entire business operating due to a broad range of safety procedures and cleaning protocols, which were implemented early and aggressively to significantly reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission and keep our employees safe. The ability of our business to remain operational during that period allowed our business to address an increase in consumer demand that began during our fiscal fourth quarter. Our management’s actions were instrumental in delivering a strong conclusion to fiscal 2020 and beyond.approve executive compensation.

Corporate Governance Policies and Practices

We maintain corporate governance policies and practices designed to align executive and director compensation with stockholder interests.

·

Stock Ownership Guidelines We have stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers. For more detailed information regarding our stock ownership guidelines, see “Corporate Governance — Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

·

Stock Holding Requirements The Compensation Committee maintained for fiscal 2020 stock holding requirements for the shares underlying stock-based awards granted to our directors and executive officers so that vested shares generally will not be delivered and therefore, at a minimum, cannot be sold until the first anniversary of the vesting date for all shares underlying the grant.

·

Board Leadership Structure We have an independent Chairman of our Board of Directors, independent committee chairs, and regular executive sessions at which only the independent directors participate.

·

Clawback Policy We have a compensation recovery, or clawback policy, that allows us to recoup incentive compensation resulting from non-compliant financial reporting.

·

Derivatives Trading and Hedging Policy We have a policy prohibiting our directors and officers, including our executive officers, and any family member(s) residing in the same household, from engaging in derivatives trading and hedging involving our securities or pledging or margining our common stock.

·

No Tax Gross-Ups We do not provide any tax gross-up treatment on any severance or change-in-control payments for our executive officers.

·

Double Trigger Vesting All unvested stock-based awards granted to our executive officers have “double-trigger” vesting acceleration in the event of a change-in-control of our company. These stock-based awards will receive vesting acceleration only if the executive officer experiences a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change-in-control.

Recent Support for Say-on-Pay Proposal

22    

2021:97%

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

·

Independent Compensation Consultant Our compensation program is developed by the Compensation Committee with assistance from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant in an effort to assure that our compensation programs are appropriately designed to attract, reward, and retain our key executive officers in a manner that is in our best interests and those of our stockholders.2022:95%

·

Risk The Compensation Committee considers the risks inherent in our compensation plans and policies and endeavors to assure that it is not reasonably likely that our compensation plans and policies would have a material adverse effect on our company.

·

Say-on-Pay We carefully monitor the compensation of our peer group companies, conduct stockholder outreach, and consider the views of proxy advisory firms and our compensation committee also gets substantial input from an experienced and highly regarded firm of compensation consultants. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers, in the context of the highly cyclical industry environment in which our company operates and is forecasted to be operating during the applicable fiscal year, the fiscal year operating budget prepared by management. The Committee then develops the Annual Executive Cash Incentive Program for the forthcoming fiscal year after the foregoing peer group review, compensation consultant advice, stockholder outreach, and review of proxy advisory firm policies. The Committee attempts to design an incentive plan, which is challenging but attainable, that incentivizes management at budget targets as well as at various levels of out-performance given industry conditions. Despite these efforts, approximately 63% of our stockholders, on an advisory basis at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders voted against the compensation of our named executive officers asAs described in our proxy statement regarding the say-on-pay proposal. In designing our fiscal 2020 Annual Executive Cash Incentive Program, the Compensation Committee acting prior to the end of fiscal 2019, and therefore before the negative fiscal 2019 say-on-pay vote, decided to increase the level of the Adjusted EBITDAS threshold gate below which no cash incentive bonus could be earned. In addition, for fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee substantially increased for fiscal 2020 the level of financial performance for revenue and Adjusted EBITDAS above which a target or out-perform bonus could be earned. As stated above, the Compensation Committee made additional changes for our fiscal 2021 Annual Executive Cash Incentive Program following the negative stockholder vote that capped bonus cash payouts and set performance targets higher than for fiscal 2020.

Factors Affecting Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Historically, the firearm and firearm-related industries have been very cyclical, with previous expansions and contractions due, in large part, to unpredictable political, economic, social, legislative, and regulatory factors beyond the control of industry participants and their management teams. During fiscal 2020 managing our company was made even more challenging by the ongoing changes being made in preparation for the Separation, the unexpected separation of our former President and Chief Executive Officer, and the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (including keeping our workforce safe while operating our business at increased demand levels). In addition to these factors, fiscal 2020 also was a challenging year for the firearm industry as overall consumer demand for firearms and firearm accessories was weak for most of the fiscal year following a decline in the prior fiscal year. Our Outdoor Products & Accessories segment was affected both by the adverse impact to the firearm industry as well as other factors in the retail market, such as a move to private labeling, the financial instability of certain distributorsCompensation Discussion and retailers, and a temporary restriction on ordering and delivery of non-essential products by the largest internet retailer during the early stages of the COVID-19stay-at-home orders. The factors thatAnalysis section, we believe have affected all participants inour compensation policies and procedures are competitive, focused on pay-for-performance principles, and aligned with the firearm industry,

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        23


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

as well as our company, included changes in the social and political environment, unsettling news events, potential legislative restrictions on the sale or design of firearms, actual and potential legislative and regulatory actions at the federal and state levels, economic changes, fears surrounding crime and terrorism, and most recently the COVID-19 pandemic. Our fiscal 2020 performance was also affected by other factors, including a perception by consumers that the political and regulatory environment was more favorable toward consumer firearm ownership, which reduced the overall demand for firearms and accessories that are attached to firearms (such as laser sights), unfavorable inventory valuation adjustments, a decline in manufacturing fixed-cost absorption, and increased depreciation expenses related to our investment in our newly constructed logistics facility. Political factors and other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase in demand for our firearm products during the fourth quarter.

Despite this very challenging and changing internal as well as industry environment, we achieved a number of significant accomplishments in fiscal 2020 that demonstrated progress toward our long-term strategy of being the leading provider of quality products for the shooting, hunting, and rugged outdoor enthusiast. The highlights of these accomplishments include the following:

·

In accordance with our pay-for-performance philosophy, the two most important measures in determining executive cash compensation, net sales and Adjusted EBITDAS, increased 6.3% and 4.5%, respectively, over the prior fiscal year.

·

Consolidated net sales were $678.4 million, an increase of $40.1 million, or 6.3%, over the prior fiscal year, which includes a $37.5 million favorable impact resulting from the required timing of federal excise tax assessment within our Firearm segment.

·

Company net loss was $61.2 million, or ($1.11) per diluted share, compared with net income of $18.4 million, or $0.33 per diluted share for the prior fiscal year. Net income was negatively impacted in fiscal 2020 by a $98.7 million non-cash impairment of goodwill change taken in the fourth quarter. The non-cash impairment charge described above had a $1.79 negative impact on fully diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2020. Fiscal 2019 included a $10.4 million non-cash impairment that negatively impacted net income by $0.19. Excluding the impact of the non-cash goodwill impairment for both years, consolidated net income for fiscal 2020 would have been $8.6 million, or 29.9%, over the prior fiscal year.

·

Company Adjusted EBITDAS was $116.3 million compared with $111.3 million in fiscal 2019, a 4.3% increase.

·

Gross margin decreased to 34.6% from 35.4% in fiscal 2019, but gross margin would have been 36.7%, or an increase of 120 basis points over last fiscal year, excluding the change related to the timing of federal excise tax.

·

Gross sales in our Firearm segment increased by $48.3 million, or 6.3%, which included $37.5 million due to the timing of federal excise tax and $3.6 million of intersegment revenue.

·

Unit shipments for our handguns increased by 7.8% compared with fiscal 2019 while unit shipments for our long-guns decreased by 9.8% compared with fiscal 2019.

·

Net sales for our handguns increased 16% while net sales for our long-guns decreased 5.7% compared with fiscal 2019.

·

New firearm products, defined as any new SKU not shipped in the prior year, accounted for 28.2% of firearm net sales for fiscal 2020.

24    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

·

The launch in our Firearm segment of 230 new firearm SKUs, one-third of which were significant new products and the remainder of which were exciting new line extensions.

·

Gross sales in our Outdoor Products & Accessories segment (which generated 24.2% of our total fiscal 2020 net sales) decreased $9.8 million, or 5.5%. The decrease in sales was primarily because of a decline in sales of our branded camping accessory products due to one large retailer accelerating a strategy towards its own private label brand and lower OEM sales of laser products. In addition, we experienced reduced orders as a result of recent bankruptcies and other financial instability by certain of our customers and several factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic that resulted in reduced foot traffic from “stay at home” orders and reduced customer orders from sporting goods store closures in many states. These negative impacts were partially offset by sales growth in e-commerce resulting from a shift to online orders.

·

New products in our Outdoor Products & Accessories segment accounted for 14% of the segment’s net sales for fiscal 2020.

·

The launch in our Outdoor Products & Accessories segment of more than 300 new products across numerous product categories, including shooting, cutlery, tools, survival, and electro-optics products.

·

The ramp up of operations at our new 633,000 square-foot logistics facility in Boone County, Missouri, which is designed to centralize and optimize the inventory management and distribution of our finished products.

·

The continued strengthening of our balance sheet with fiscal year-end net bank borrowings of $33.8 million, a reduction of $80.9 million from the prior fiscal year-end, and a reduction of nearly $104.0 million of net borrowings in less than three years, while still investing heavily in our business, including small acquisitions and the construction of our new logistics and customer service facility.

·

The significant progress made in the preparation for the Separation.

Company and Leadership Changes During Fiscal 2020

On November 13, 2019, we announced that we were proceeding with a plan to separate our outdoor products and accessories business, or the Separation, and create an independent, publicly traded company to conduct that business. We believe that separating our outdoor products and accessories business from our firearm business and forming a new company to conduct the outdoor products and accessories business will enable the management team of each of the firearm and outdoor products companies to focus on its specific strategies, including, among others, (1) structuring its business to take advantage of growth opportunities in its specific markets, (2) tailoring its business operation and financial model to its specific long-term strategies, and (3) aligning its external financial resources, such as stock, access to markets, credit, and insurance factors, with its particular type of business. In our view, the Separation is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders and will create two industry-leading companies with attributes that best position each company for long-term success. In preparation for the Separation, on May 29, 2020, we changed our name to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., and on June 1, 2020, we changed the name of the company that will operate our outdoor products and accessories business through its subsidiaries to American Outdoor Brands, Inc. or AOUT. During fiscal 2020, the management and the Board of Directors of our company has devoted significant time and attention to reorganize and restructure our company in preparation for the Separation. The Separation was completed on August 24, 2020.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        25


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Effective January 14, 2020, P. James Debney separated as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of our company following the determination by our Board of Directors that he engaged in conduct inconsistent with a non-financial company policy. Effective January 15, 2020, our Board of Directors appointed Mark P. Smith and Brian D. Murphy as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers of our company. See “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements with Our Named Executive Officers — Severance Agreement with Mr. Debney” for a more detailed discussion of the severance arrangement with Mr. Debney.

On April 4, 2020, we entered into a separate employment agreement with each of Brian D. Murphy and Mark P. Smith, as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of our company, effective as of January 15, 2020. Our agreement with Mr. Murphy specifies that he would resign his positions with our company effective as of the Separation and would become the President and Chief Executive Officer of AOUT. Our agreement with Mr. Smith specifies that he would be the sole President and Chief Executive Officer of our company effective as of the Separation. See “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements with Our Named Executive Officers — Employment Agreements with Mr. Smith and Mr. Murphy” for a more detailed discussion of the employment arrangements of Messrs. Murphy and Smith.

As a result of these numerous changes occurring in fiscal 2020, our Compensation Committee, in making compensation decisions for Messrs. Murphy and Smith, considered their prior roles as divisional officers of our company until January 14, 2020, their roles as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers of our company from January 15, 2020, and their future respective roles after the Separation as the President and Chief Executive Officer of AOUT and the President and Chief Executive Officer our company in making executive compensation decisions.

In conjunction with the Separation, Mr. Buchanan retired from our company and Mr. Tobiassen left our company. See “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements with Our Named Executive Officers — Retirement Agreement with Mr. Buchanan” for a more detailed discussion of the retirement arrangements with Mr. Buchanan. See “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements with Our Named Executive Officers — Separation Agreement with Mr. Tobiassen” for a more detailed discussion of the separation arrangements with Mr. Tobiassen.

The Compensation Committee

Our Board of Directors has appointed a Compensation Committee, consisting exclusively of independent directors. The charter of the Compensation Committee authorizes the Compensation Committee to determine and approve, or to make recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to, the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Our Board of Directors has authorized the Compensation Committee to make all decisions with respect to such executive compensation. Among other things, the Compensation Committee is authorized to determine and approve the base salary of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Additionally, the Compensation Committee establishes annual cash and stock-based compensation programs for our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, providing our executives with variable compensation opportunities, a majority of which are based on the achievement of key operating measures, determined at the beginning of the fiscal year, tying pay to performance. Once the Compensation Committee determines key operating measures for the forthcoming fiscal year, the measures generally are not subject to material changes during the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee, with advice from its independent compensation consultant, also determines the compensation of our Board of Directors.

26    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

The Compensation Committee strongly recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” this year’s resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2020 for the reasons set forth in more detail below. These reasons include our company’s strong financial performance, especially compared with our direct competitors in a very difficult market and complicated company environment (which included disruptions and other effects of the changes in senior management, the internal company-wide changes in preparation for the Separation, and the COVID-19 pandemic), the alignment of compensation with our pay-for-performance philosophy, and the achievement of the performance targets under our 2020 Cash Incentive Plan. This recommendation is consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, which resulted in no cash bonuses under our Cash Incentive Plans in two of the last five fiscal years, including fiscal 2018, because of the failure in those two years to achieve the pre-established performance targets, and no issuance of stock under the Performance Share Units, or PSUs, for the performance periods in the past three years because of the failure in those years of our stock to perform as required against the Russell 2000 Index, or the RUT.

Overview

stockholders. Our executive compensation program consists primarily of base salary, annual performance-based cash incentive compensation opportunities, stock-based compensation, severance and change-in-control payments and benefits, health and welfare benefits generally available to employees and other executives of our company, and limited perquisites as described herein. The Compensation Committee considers each element of compensation individually and collectively with other elements of compensation when establishing the various forms, elements, and levels of compensation for our executive officers.

Our philosophy with respect to executive compensation is to pay base salaries to our executive officers at levels that, in the context of unfavorable industry factors beyond the control of management, enable us to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives. In addition, ourOur executive compensation program is designed to link annual performance-based cash incentive compensation to the achievement of pre-established performance objectives, based primarily on our company’s financial results and the achievement of other corporate goals, but also,goals.

Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy:

Our NEOs received no annual cash incentive payment for fiscal 2023 because we failed to achieve the threshold target for Adjusted EBITDAS.
Our NEOs who received a stock-based award in certain limited cases,2020 receivednone of the target shares of common stock for the PSU portion of the awardbecause we failed to meet the minimum performance requirements.

The advisory vote on individual performance objectivesthis resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, it relates to the overall compensation of our NEOs, as well as the compensation philosophy, policies, and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Our stockholders may vote for or against, or abstain from voting on, the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that contributethe stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, executive compensation tables, and narrative discussion set forth in the Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This advisory vote will not be binding on the Board. The Compensation Committee will, however, take the outcome of the vote into account when considering future executive compensation decisions. We provide our stockholders with this advisory vote on an annual basis and expect that the next such vote will occur at the 2024 Annual Meeting.

img125871598_5.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 16


Compensation Matters

PROPOSAL THREE – ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

What Am I Voting On? The Board is asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation

Voting Recommendation:FORthe option of every “1 year”

Vote Required: The option of every “1 year,” “2 years,” or “3 years” that receives the highest number of affirmative votes by those shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

In accordance with SEC rules, our stockholders may vote, on an advisory basis, on how frequently they would like to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs. The Board believes conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis is currently appropriate for us and our stockholders.

Our stockholders may cast a vote on the preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of “1 year,” “2 years,” or “3 years,” or they may abstain from voting in response to the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders wish the Company to include an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act every:

one year,

two years, or

three years.

Because the required vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. The Board will, however, take into account the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency with which we will provide our stockholders the opportunity to vote, on an advisory basis, to approve the compensation of our NEOs.

17 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Named Executive Officers

This section describes our executive compensation program, outlines the core principles behind that program, and reviews the actions taken by the Compensation Committee concerning the fiscal 2023 compensation of the following NEOs:

Name

Title

Mark P. Smith

President and CEO

Deana L. McPherson

Executive Vice President, CFO, Treasurer, and Assistant

Secretary

Kevin A. Maxwell

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance

Officer, and Secretary

Susan J. Cupero

Vice President, Sales

Program Emphasis

Our executive compensation program emphasizes our pay-for-performance philosophy and is designed to help us attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives.

Compensation Governance and Practices

Our executive compensation program demonstrates our ongoing commitment to good corporate governance practices and aligns our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Risk Mitigation

Program Features

Clawback policy

Stock ownership guidelines

Derivatives trading and hedging policy

Annual review of compensation plans and policies

   includes risk assessment

Annual say-on-pay advisory vote

Independent compensation consultant

"Double trigger" vesting acceleration in the event
    of a change-in-control

No tax gross ups in connection with severance or

   change-in control payments

Say-on-Pay Results

At the 2022 Annual Meeting, 95% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory vote to approve executive compensation. We have recently received high levels of support from our stockholders on advisory votes to approve executive compensation. Based on these high levels of support, the Compensation Committee determined not to make any material changes to our long-term goalexecutive compensation program.

Recent Support for Say-on-Pay Proposal

2021:97%

2022:95%

18 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

Summary of building stockholder value.Fiscal 2023 Compensation Program

The following highlights aspects of our fiscal 2023 compensation program:

Base Salary— Consistent with past practice, in April 2022 the Compensation Committee, with advice from its independent compensation consultant, reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers and compared them with peer group and broad market data. The Compensation Committee adjusted base salary levels to more closely align with comparable positions at our peer group, to reflect additional experience, and to take into account cost-of-living factors. In fiscal 2023, base salary increases for our NEOs ranged from 2.9% to 3.0%.
Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses— Our executive annual cash incentive program for fiscal 2023 continued to focus on the achievement of objective annual financial goals; specifically, Net Sales and Adjusted EBITDAS. NEO annual target cash incentive compensation as a percentage of base salary was 100% in the case of our CEO, 75% in the case of our CFO, and 65% for our other NEOs. When setting the financial performance goals at the beginning of fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee considered the difficult and unpredictable environment for our business and the relative lack of control that our management has over external, social, political, health, and economic factors that impact us. In accordance with our pay-for-performance philosophy, our NEOs received no bonus payment for fiscal 2023 because we failed to achieve the threshold target for Adjusted EBITDAS.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation— Consistent with past practice, the Compensation Committee granted stock-based awards to our executive officers in fiscal 2023, consisting of a mix of RSUs (40%) and PSUs (60%). The RSUs vest one-fourth following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The number of shares of common stock, if any, to be delivered under PSUs depends on the relative performance of our common stock compared with the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (the “RUT”), with a target payout requiring our performance to be higher than the RUT over a three-year period.

Factors Affecting Fiscal 2023 Compensation

Historically, the firearm industry has been very cyclical, with past expansions and contractions driven, in large part, by unpredictable political, economic, social, legislative, and regulatory factors beyond the control of industry participants and their management teams. For example, we experienced historic levels of demand for our products in parts of fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, in part, as a result of the impact of COVID-19 and the social unrest experienced in the United States during the summer of 2020. Since then, demand for our products has returned to more detailed information regardingnormalized levels, which adversely impacted our year-over-year financial and operating results in fiscal 2023.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy is to pay base salaries to our executive officers at levels that, in the context of unfavorable industry factors beyond the control of management, enable us to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives. Our executive compensation program is designed to link annual performance-based cash incentive compensation plan, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Componentsto the achievement of Compensation — Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”pre-established performance objectives, based primarily on our financial results. Similarly, our executive compensation program is designed so that stock-based compensation focuses our executive officers’ efforts on increasing stockholder value by aligning their economic interests with those of our stockholders. To that end, our stock-based compensation generally is intended to result in more limited rewards if the market price of our common stock does not appreciate or does not appreciate in an amount equal to or above certain levels, but may provide substantial rewards to our executive officers (as well as to our stockholders in general) if our common stock appreciates or appreciates in an amount equal to or above certain levels. For more detailed information regarding our stock-based compensation program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of Compensation — Stock-Based Compensation.”

Total compensation levels for our executive officers reflect corporate positions, responsibilities, and the achievement of performance objectives. As a result ofDue to our continuing “pay-for-performance”pay-for-performance philosophy, realized compensation levels may vary significantly from year-to-year and among our various executive officers. In general, we expect

19 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

Goals

Our executive compensation program’s objectives include:

Attracting, motivating, and retaining highly qualified executives, especially in the context of challenging business conditions.
Reflecting our culture and approach to total rewards, which include health and welfare benefits, a safe work environment, and professional development opportunities.
Reflecting our “pay-for-performance” philosophy.
Providing a rational and consistent approach to compensation that is understood by senior leadership.
Aligning compensation with our interests, as well as those of our stockholders.
Recognizing corporate stewardship and fiscal responsibility.

ADMINISTRATION

The Board has appointed a Compensation Committee, consisting exclusively of independent directors. The charter of the Compensation Committee authorizes the Compensation Committee to determine and approve, or to make recommendations to the Board with respect to, the compensation level of our Chief Executive Officer will be higher than that of ourCEO and other executive officers. This assumes relatively equal achievement of individual performance objectives, sinceThe Board has authorized the Compensation Committee setsto make all decisions with respect to executive compensation. Among other things, the Compensation Committee is authorized to determine and approve the base salary of our base salaries,CEO and other executive officers. Additionally, the Compensation Committee establishes annual cash and stock-based incentive compensation programs for our CEO and stock-basedother executive officers and provides our executives with variable compensation after reviewing similar compensation elementsopportunities, a majority of which is based on the achievement of key operating measures determined at the beginning of the executives at comparable companies, whichfiscal year. Once the Compensation Committee determines key operating measures for the upcoming fiscal year, the measures generally compensate their chief executive officers at

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        27


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

higher levels because of their roles and their importanceare not subject to overall company success. We believe thatmaterial changes during the overall compensation levels for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are and continue to be in alignment with our “pay-for-performance” philosophy and have been consistent with our performance.

fiscal year. The Compensation Committee, has developed an executivewith advice from its independent compensation program that demonstrates our ongoing commitment to good corporate governance practices and aligns our executive officers’ interests with thoseconsultant, also determines the compensation of our stockholders. This includes maintaining a compensation recovery, or clawback, policy and stock ownership guidelines, maintaining incentive stock and incentive bonus plans intended to align our incentive award grant practices with current market practices and to set forth the principles to which our stockholders expect us to adhere in designing and administering compensation programs, and prohibiting the repricing of options and stock appreciation rights, or SARs, without approval by our stockholders. In addition, we do not provide for any tax gross-ups in connection with severance or change-in-control payments.directors.

Goals

The goals of our executive compensation program are as follows:

·

attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives, especially in the context of the present very difficult industry environment over which management has little, if any, control;

·

reflect our company’s culture and approach to total rewards, which includes benefits, work environment, and development opportunities;

·

reflect our philosophy of “pay-for-performance” and enable us to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives;

·

provide a rational and consistent approach to compensation, which is understood by senior leadership;

·

align compensation with the interests of our company as a whole and our stockholders; and

·

recognize corporate stewardship and fiscal responsibility.

Role of the Compensation Committee and Chief Executive Officerour CEO

The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer andexecutive officers, including our other executive officers. AtCEO, at least annually the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and determines the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation in light of the goals and objectives of our compensation program for that fiscal year. Theyear’s compensation program. Together with our CEO, the Compensation Committee together with our Chief Executive Officer, annually assesses the performance of our other executive officers. After receiving recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer,CEO, the Compensation Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, determines the compensation forof our other executive officers.

At the request of the Compensation Committee, our Chief Executive Officer may attend a portion of some of the Compensation Committee meetings, including meetings at which our independent compensation consultant is present. This enables the Compensation Committee to review with our Chief Executive Officer the corporate and individual goals that the Chief Executive Officer regards as important to achieve our overall success. The Compensation Committee also requests that our Chief Executive Officer assess the performance of and our goals for our other executive officers.

28    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

However, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, rather than our Chief Executive Officer, makes the decisions regarding individual and corporate goals and targets for our other executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer does not attend any portion of meetings at which his compensation is determined. We had Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers for a portion of fiscal 2020.

Compensation Surveys and Independent Compensation Consultant

In determining executive officer compensation levels, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews compensation levels of executives of companies that it deemsdeemed to be generally similar to our companyours based on their size, industry, and competitive factors to enable our company to attract executives from other industries and to establish compensation levels that it deems appropriate to retain and motivate our executive officers.factors. The Compensation Committee uses this peer group information, as well as published executive compensation survey data from a broader group of companies with similar revenue to our companyours, as points of reference butreference; however, the Compensation Committee does not benchmark or target our compensation levels to a specific percentile against this competitive information.

At the invitation of the Compensation Committee, our CEO may attend portions of Compensation Committee meetings, except those at which his compensation is discussed or determined. This enables the Compensation Committee to review with him the goals that he regards as important to achieving our success and to receive his assessment of the performance of, and goals for, our other executive officers. However, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, rather than our CEO, determines goals, targets, and compensation for our other executives.

20 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has sole discretion to retain a compensation consultant and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee retains the services of an independenta compensation consultant to assist in setting the design and goals of the executive compensation program, to review trends in executive compensation, assist with the identification ofto identify relevant peer companies, and to conduct an assessment and analysis of executive market compensation. The Compensation Committee makes all determinations regarding the engagement, fees, and services of its compensation consultant, and its compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee. From time to time,

Compensia, Inc. served as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant for fiscal 2023. For fiscal 2023, the compensation consultant identified for the Compensation Committee may retainpeer group companies, provided a compensation assessment and analysis of those companies, determined the servicespositioning of outside legal counseleach executive officer’s compensation by element among the peer companies and the survey data, developed recommendations and guidelines for the structure of our executive compensation program, reviewed the overall compensation package, and advised the Compensation Committee regarding the appropriateness of our executive compensation program. In addressing Compensia’s independence in light of applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq standards, the Compensation Committee considered relevant factors and concluded that Compensia is independent and the engagement would not raise any conflicts of interest under the applicable rules and standards.

Peer Group for Fiscal 2023

The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant identified for the Compensation Committee a peer group for fiscal 2023. In selecting peer companies for the Compensation Committee’s final review, the consultant identified companies deemed generally relevant to adviseus with a focus on those involved in durables and apparel and consumer products companies, especially those with high dollar value products. The consultant then supplemented the list with companies involved in manufacturing. Within these industries, the consultant used a “rules-based” approach to select companies based on similar financial characteristics; specifically, it on compensation matters.targeted companies with revenue from approximately $500 million to $2 billion and a market capitalization from approximately $300 million to $3 billion. The consultant proposed, and the Compensation Committee adopted, a number of changes to the peer group for fiscal 2023 in order to improve our alignment with the peer group’s median revenue and market capitalization selection criteria. Specifically, the Compensation Committee added three companies (Lifetime Brands, Inc., OneWater Marine Inc., and Quannex Building Products Corp.) to the peer group for fiscal 2023 and removed three other companies (Callaway Golf Company, National Presto Industries, and NN, Inc.).

Components of Compensation

Fiscal 2023 Peer Group

Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.

Movado Group, Inc.

Go Pro, Inc.

OneWater Marine Inc.

Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.

Quanex Building Products Corp.

Hooker Furniture Corporation

Standard Motor Products

iRobot Corporation

Standex International Corporation

Johnson Outdoors Inc.

Stoneridge, Inc.

  Lifetime Brands, Inc.

Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.

Malibu Boats, Inc.

Universal Electronics Inc.

MarineMax, Inc.

Vista Outdoor Inc.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.

Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.

21 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

Our executive compensation program continuesconsists primarily of base salary, annual performance-based cash incentive compensation opportunities, stock-based compensation, and severance benefits, together with health and welfare benefits generally available to emphasizemost employees and our “pay-for-performance” philosophyother executives, and helps us to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives. Our compensation program provides the opportunity for our executives to receive higher total compensation based on successful performance against objective metrics, financial and otherwise, and above- market stock price appreciation.

Base Salary

limited perquisites. The Compensation Committee setsconsiders each element of compensation individually and collectively with other elements of compensation when establishing the base salariesvarious forms, elements, and levels of our executive officers at levels that it believes are required to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified individuals assuming that they will not receive incentive compensation but reflecting the possible receipt of incentive compensation. Base salaries for our executive officersofficers.

Our fiscal 2023 executive compensation program included the following direct compensation components: base salary, annual performance-based cash incentives, and stock-based compensation.

Factors

Base Salary

Annual Performance

-Based

Cash Incentive

PSUs

RSUs

   Form of Compensation

Cash

Equity

Fixed

Performance-Based

Performance-Based

Time-Based

   Performance Timing

Short-Term

Emphasis

Long-Term

Emphasis

   Measurement Period

Annual and

Ongoing

1 year

Vests at end

of 3-year

period

Vests 25%

each year over

4-year

period

   Key Performance Metrics

   Applicable

Net Sales;

Adjusted EBITDAS

Relative TSR

Stock Price

   Determination of

   Performance-Based

   Payouts

Formulaic

Formulaic

Base Salaries

Base salaries are establisheddesigned to provide competitive levels of compensation to our executives based on an individual’stheir position, responsibilities, skills, experience, performance, and contributions. In determining base salaries, theThe Compensation Committee also considers individual performance and contributions, future potential, competitive salary levels for comparable positions at other companies, salary levels relative to other internal positions, within our company, corporate needs, and the advice of the Compensation Committee’sits independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the foregoingthese factors is subjective, and the Compensation Committeeit does not assign a particular weight to any one factor.

The Compensation Committee independently determines the base salary of our Chief Executive Officer. The base salaries for our other executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, are determined by the Compensation Committee following consultations with the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer as one of the factors described above. We had Co-Chief Executive Officers for a portion of fiscal 2020.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        29


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Given the high-profile nature of the firearmsour industry, it has become increasingly difficult to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified individuals willing to be associated with us and our company and the firearms industry as a whole.industry. The Compensation Committee has become increasingly aware of the impact this factor has had not only on existing and potential future employees, but also the pressures this factor places on the families of these individuals. During fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee also considered the challenges of building the management team for our outdoor products and accessories business.

22 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

Fiscal 2023 Base Salaries. The Compensation Committee generally sets base salary levelssalaries for our executive officers at the beginning of each fiscal year, although it can make changes to base salary levels at any time during the fiscal year. For more detailed information regardingBased on an evaluation of the amounts paid asfactors listed above, the Compensation Committee’s desire to reward and retain our executive officers, the general industry range for base salary toincreases, and the competitiveness of our named executive officersbase salaries as measured against the peer and market data, the Compensation Committee set our NEOs’ annual base salaries for fiscal 2023 as follows:

Name and Position

 

Annualized
Fiscal 2022
Base Salary

 

 

 

 

Annualized
Fiscal 2023
Base Salary

 

 

 

Percentage
Change

Mark P. Smith

 

$

 

700,000

 

 

 

$

 

721,000

 

(1)

 

3.0%

Deana L. McPherson

 

$

 

400,000

 

 

 

$

 

412,000

 

(1)

 

3.0%

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

$

 

340,000

 

 

 

$

 

350,000

 

(1)

 

2.9%

Susan J. Cupero

 

$

 

300,000

 

 

 

$

 

309,000

 

(1)

 

3.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) The increase took into account peer company comparisons and additional experience in fiscal 2020, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2020 Compensation — Base Salaries.”the position.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation

As it has in the past, at the start of fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee established aAnnual performance-based cash incentive compensation plan foris designed to motivate our executive officers.executives and reward the achievement of specific performance goals that support our business strategy. In designing the cash incentive compensation plan for any particular year or period, the Compensation Committee establishes performance objectives, based primarily on theour financial results of our company and our divisions and the achievement of other corporate goals. In some limited cases, the Compensation Committee also considersmay consider individual objectives, responsibilities, and performance in determining the amounts payable, under the plan, but it did not do so in fiscal 2020. 2023.

The Compensation Committee determines the target annual compensation opportunities for our executive officers, are determined by the Compensation Committee. These objective target incentive compensationwith these opportunities arebeing subject to change from year to year based on the Compensation Committee’sits periodic review of economic, industry, and competitive data; changes in individual responsibilities; and our overall compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee confirms, with its independent compensation consultant and our company’s independent audit firm, the achievement of the objectives and approves the payment, if any, of annual cash incentive compensation in the first quarter of the following fiscal year. For more detailed information regarding

Fiscal 2023 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program. In April 2022, the amounts paid as annualCompensation Committee established the 2023 Executive Annual Bonus Plan, a performance-based cash incentive compensation plan for our executives, including our NEOs (the “2023 Bonus Plan”). The 2023 Bonus Plan provided each participant an opportunity to earn cash incentive compensation based on attaining pre-established objective financial performance metrics and, from time to time, individual performance goals. Each participant was assigned an incentive bonus opportunity expressed as a percentage of base pay and objective financial performance metrics were established with varying weightings totaling 100%. For each metric, threshold, budget, target, and maximum performance levels were set. Final cash incentive compensation was calculated by multiplying each participant’s target percentage by the weighted average percentage calculated for each metric. Cash incentive compensation could not exceed 200% of a participant’s target bonus opportunity, and eligibility for payment of any award was subject to the participant continuing to be employed by us through the end of the fiscal year.

Fiscal 2023 Performance Metrics. For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee established Net Sales and Adjusted EBITDAS as the performance metrics for our named executive officersexecutives, with a weighting of 40% for Net Sales and 60% for Adjusted EBITDAS. Adjusted EBITDAS also served as the threshold for which the failure to achieve this performance metric would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the other performance metric.

The target award percentages for fiscal 2020, see “Compensation Discussion2023 as a percentage of base pay were 100% for Mr. Smith, 75% for Ms. McPherson, and Analysis — Fiscal 202065% for Mr. Maxwell and Ms. Cupero. There were no individual performance goals for fiscal 2023.

23 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

For these purposes, “Adjusted EBITDAS” means our net income as reported in the Form 10-K adding back interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash stock compensation expense and any nonrecurring expenses as determined by the Compensation — Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”Committee as set forth in the 2023 Bonus Plan or at any time thereafter. For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee determined to include the following nonrecurring expenses: (i) accelerated expenses related to the refinance of our credit facility, if any; (ii) fair value inventory step-up and backlog expense; (iii) all acquisition or merger related expenses associated with negotiating, conducting diligence, and closing for any acquired company or merger; (iv) any costs associated with the Relocation, including severance, relocation, recruiting, construction and duplication of costs; (v) changes in contingent consideration; (vi) impairment charges for goodwill, tangible, or intangible assets; (vii) costs incurred relating to shareholder activism; (viii) any gain or loss incurred on a sale or disposal of a product line, which sale or disposal is approved by the Board; (ix) costs directly related to inventory that cannot be sold or otherwise used by us, which unsaleable or unusable inventory is the result of a change in federal firearms law; and (x) any costs/impact related to the implementation of any new accounting pronouncements that become effective during the fiscal year. To the extent practicable, each amount was calculated based upon the numbers used in the audited financial statements and, if possible, in the same amount as reported in the Form 10-K.

The financial performance metrics established under the 2023 Bonus Plan were as follows:

Performance Metrics

 

 

Target
Performance
(in 000's)

 

 

Potential
Maximum
Payout of
Target
Bonus

 

 

Performance
Required
to Earn
Maximum
Payout
(as a % of
Target
Performance)

 

Net Sales

 

 $

 

864,126

 

 

 

200.0

%

 

 

115.0

%

Adjusted EBITDAS

 

 $

 

300,864

 

 

 

200.0

%

 

 

115.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The failure to reach the threshold metric of at least $141,277, or 47.0% of target, for the Adjusted EBITDAS metric would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the Net Sales metric.

In fiscal 2023, Net Sales and Adjusted EBITDAS, for purposes of compensation, were $479.2 million and $95.2 million, respectively, compared with $864.0 million and $299.6 million, respectively, in fiscal 2022. We experienced historic levels of demand for our products in parts of fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, in part because of the impact of COVID-19 and the social unrest experienced in the U.S. during the summer of 2020. Since then, demand for our products has returned to more normalized levels, which adversely impacted our year-over-year financial and operating results in fiscal 2023.

The table below sets forth for each NEO the annual fiscal 2023 base salary, the target bonus percentage, the annualized target cash bonus opportunity, and the actual bonus paid for fiscal 2023 reflected as a percentage of target bonus opportunity and in cash:

Name

 

Annual
Fiscal 2023
Base Salary

 

 

Target
Bonus
Percentage

 

 

Annualized
Target Cash
Bonus
Opportunity

 

 

Actual Bonus
paid for
Fiscal 2023
(as a % of
Target
Bonus
Opportunity

 

Actual
Bonus
Paid for
Fiscal 2023

 

Mark P. Smith

 

$

 

721,000

 

 

100%

 

$

 

721,000

 

 

0.0%

 

$

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

$

 

412,000

 

 

75%

 

$

 

309,000

 

 

0.0%

 

$

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

$

 

350,000

 

 

65%

 

$

 

227,500

 

 

0.0%

 

$

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

$

 

309,000

 

 

65%

 

$

 

200,850

 

 

0.0%

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

Stock-Based Compensation

Our stock-based compensation is composed of both RSUs and PSUs. We believe stock-based compensation is critical in aligning our executives’ and stockholders’ interests. Together, we believe that these incentives focus our executives on making decisions that will benefit our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee strongly believes in tying executive rewards directly to our long-term success and focusing our executive officers’executives’ efforts on increasing stockholder value by aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. To that end, our stock-based compensation generally is intended to result in more limited rewards if the price of our common stock does not appreciate or does not appreciate above certain levels but may provide substantial rewards to our executive officers (as well as to our stockholders in general) if our common stock appreciates above certain levels. Our stock-based compensation also enables our executive officersexecutives to developearn and maintain a significant stock ownership position in our company.us. The amount of stock-based compensation granted takes into account the performance of our company;performance; the grant date value of awards; previous grants to an executive officer; an executive officer’s position with our company;position; the performance, contributions, skills, experience, and responsibilities of the executive officer; the cost to our company;us; the executive officer’s total compensation in relation to peers at our peer companies; and other factors that the Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate from time to time, including retention, overhang, and burn rate.

30    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Our stock-based compensation consists primarily of RSUs, and PSUs. The Compensation Committee generally sets the vesting schedule for RSUs over multiple year periods to encourage executive retention. The Compensation Committee generally establishes multi-year performance requirements for the earning of PSUs to reward long-term companyCompany performance. PSUs are earned only if the relative performance of our common stock achieves the then-applicable pre-established metric compared with the performance of the RUT. At times, we may require a holding period after vesting that provides for the delivery of the shares of our common stock underlying stock-based awards on a delayed basis.RUT’s performance. In addition, we may institutegenerally maintain a value cap on PSUs.

As has been true in the case of base salary and cash-based incentive compensation, givenGiven the high-profile nature of the firearmsour industry, it has become increasingly difficult to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified individuals willing to be associated with the industry as a wholeus and therefore our company. Accordingly, theindustry. The Compensation Committee continues to recognize the importance of long-term incentive stock-based compensation even though the investment community generally has not recently looked favorably upon the positive financial performance of our company given the unfavorable factors attributed to the firearm industry as a whole.factor in executive compensation.

Benefits and Perquisites

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in those health, welfare, and retirement plans, including our profit sharing, 401(k), employee stock purchase, and medical and disability plans generally available to employees of our company who meet applicable eligibility requirements. For more detailed information regarding the retirement benefits for which our named executive officers are eligible and contributions made to retirement plans on behalf of our named executive officers, see “Executive Compensation — Retirement Plans.”

In addition, from time to time, we provide certain of our executive officers with other benefits and perquisites that we believe are reasonable. These benefits and perquisites include severance and change-in-control benefits, car allowances, housing allowances, relocation assistance, a nonqualified supplemental deferred compensation plan, and reimbursement of insurance premiums. For more detailed information regarding these other benefits and perquisites for which our named executive officers are eligible, see “Executive Compensation.”

We do not view perquisites and other personal benefits as a significant element of our executive compensation program, but do believe they can be useful in attracting, motivating, and retaining the executive talent for which we compete. We believe that these additional benefits may assist our executive officers in performing their duties and provide time efficiencies for our executive officers in appropriate circumstances.

In the future, we may provide additional benefits and perquisites to our executive officers as an element of their overall compensation. All future practices regarding benefits and perquisites will be approved and subject to periodic review by the Compensation Committee.

Policies for the Pricing and Timing of Stock-Based Compensation

Awards. The Compensation Committee sets the value of RSUs and PSUs at the fair market value of our common stock, which, for annual awards, is the average closing price of our common stock on Nasdaq for the five-day period ending on the effective date of grant and, for new hires or special awards, is the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the effective date of grant. The Compensation Committee generally grants stock-based compensation to our executive officers annually within the same time frame each year. In the case of new hires, grant prices generally are determined by the closing price of our common stock on the 15th day of the month following the date on which the employee reports for service. The Compensation

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        31


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Committee authorizes our Chief Executive Officer to grant stock-based compensation to employees who are not executive officers, subject to limitations on amount and subsequent reporting to the Compensation Committee.

Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc., or Compensia, an independent national compensation consulting firm, to assist in the design of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2020. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and dismiss its compensation consultants and approve the fees of its compensation consultant. No member of the Compensation Committee or any named executive officer has any affiliation with Compensia, and Compensia did not provide any services to our company during fiscal 2020 other than services to the Compensation Committee. In accordance with the requirements of applicable SEC rules, the Compensation Committee has reviewed the independence of Compensia and has determined that Compensia did not have any conflicts of interest under the criteria established under such rules.

As a part of its evaluation of our executive compensation program, Compensia assisted the Compensation Committee in determining an appropriate group of peer companies. The Compensation Committee uses the peer companies at the beginning of the fiscal year as one source of competitive market information for cash compensation and at the end of the fiscal year to provide competitive market information for equity compensation. Because the Compensation Committee reviews market data at different times to determine cash and equity compensation, it used three peer groups — the peer group developed in fiscal 2019 to set cash compensation for all executive officers and two peer groups, one for each post-spin company, developed in fiscal 2020 to set cash compensation for the Co-Chief Executive Officers and equity compensation for each NEO (based on their post-spin company). In selecting peer companies for the Compensation Committee’s consideration, Compensia identified companies deemed generally relevant to us with a focus on companies involved in leisure or cyclical and consumer products companies, especially those with high dollar value products, and supplementing this list with companies involved in manufacturing. Within these industries, Compensia used a “rules-based” approach to select companies based on similar financial characteristics. Specifically, Compensia selected companies with revenue from 50% to 200% of our revenue, market capitalizations from 30% to 300% of our market capitalization, and positive revenue growth at the time of the peer group review. In the case of the post-spin peer groups, the same revenue and market capitalization criteria were applied to the projected revenue and market capitalization of each post-spin company.

The selected peer group for our cash compensation review in late fiscal 2019, as approved by the Compensation Committee, consisted of the following companies:

Bassett Furniture

Motorcar Parts of America

Callaway Golf Co.

Movado Group

ESCO Technologies

Nautilus

Ethan Allen Interiors

Oxford Industries

Flexsteel Industries

Plantronics

Gentherm

Standex International

Haverty Furniture

Stoneridge

Hooker Furniture

Sturm Ruger & Company

Infinera

Universal Electronics

Johnson Outdoors

ZAGG

Malibu Boats

32    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

The selected peer group for the Firearm segment compensation review in fiscal 2020, as approved by the Compensation Committee, consisted of the following companies:

Bassett Furniture

National Presto Industries

Delta Apparel

NN, Inc.

Ethan Allen Interiors

Rocky Brands

Haverty Furniture

Sportsman’s Warehouse

Hooker Furniture

Standex International

Johnson Outdoors

Stoneridge

Malibu Boats

Sturm Ruger & Company

Marine Products

Universal Electronics

MasterCraft Boat Holdings

Vince Holding Corporation

Motorcar Parts of America

ZAGG

Movado Group

The Compensation Committee continued to include a supplemental peer company, Vista Outdoor, because of its close business similarities to the Firearm segment despite the fact that it exceeds our revenue selection range. Information from Vista Outdoor was not included in the overall peer market data, however, but was shown on a supplemental basis to help the Compensation Committee better understand how competitors compensate their key executives. With the exception of Sturm Ruger & Company and Vista Outdoor, our peer group generally was not faced with the substantial industry challenges that we faced in fiscal 2020 as described above.

The selected peer group for Outdoor Products & Accessories segment compensation review in fiscal 2020, as approved by the Compensation Committee, consisted of the following companies:

Agilysys

Marine Products

Bassett Furniture

MasterCraft Boat Holdings

Clarus

Motorcar Parts of America

Delta Apparel

Purple Innovation

Duluth Holdings

Quotient Technology

Escalade

Rocky Brands

Ethan Allen Interiors

Superior Group of Companies

Flexsteel Industries

The Lovesac Company

Franchise Group

The Rubicon Project

Hooker Furniture

Transcat

Johnson Outdoors

Vince Holding Corporation

KVH Industries

XPEL

Limoneira Company

ZAGG Inc

Malibu Boats

The Compensation Committee determined to include two supplemental peer companies, Fox Factory Holding and YETI Holdings, because of their close business similarities to the Outdoor Products & Accessories segment despite the fact that they exceed our expected market capitalization range. Information from Fox Factory Holding and YETI Holdings were not included in the overall peer market data, however, but was shown on a supplemental basis to help the Compensation Committee better understand how competitors compensate their key executives.

Compensia provided an assessment and analysis of the compensation practices of our peer companies, determined the positioning of each executive officer’s compensation by element among the

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        33


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

peer companies and the survey data, developed recommendations and guidelines for the structure of our executive compensation program, and reviewed the overall compensation package and advised the Compensation Committee regarding the appropriateness of our executive compensation program.

Base Salaries

As is our practice, the Compensation Committee generally, although not always, sets base salaries for our executive officers at the beginning of the fiscal year based on a review of the position and function of each executive officer, the competitiveness of their current base salaries in comparison to the peer and market data, and their individual performance on a subjective basis. Based on an evaluation of the foregoing factors, the Compensation Committee’s desire to reward and retain the key executive officers who it believes are instrumental to our success, the general industry range for base salary increases, and the competitiveness of our base salaries as measured against the peer and market data, the Compensation Committee set the annual base salaries for our executive officers during fiscal 2020 as follows:

  Name and Position  Annualized
Fiscal 2019
Base Salary
   Annualized
Fiscal 2020
Base Salary
  Percentage
Change
 

Mark P. Smith

  $346,698   $357,099(1)   3.0

Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer from January 15, 2020 through April 30, 2020; Senior Vice President, Manufacturing Services Division from May 1, 2019 until January 14, 2020

     

Brian D. Murphy

  $291,748   $315,087(1)   8.0

Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer from January 15, 2020 through April 30, 2020; President, Outdoor Products & Accessories Division from May 1, 2019 until January 14, 2020

     

P. James Debney

  $749,700   $749,700   

President and Chief Executive Officer from May 1, 2019 until January 14, 2020

     

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  $411,264   $423,602   3.0

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, and Treasurer

     

Robert J. Cicero

  $347,004   $357,414   3.0

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary

     

Lane Tobiassen

  $286,443   $315,087   10.0

President, Firearm Division

     

(1)

Effective with their appointment as of January 15, 2020 as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, the annual base salaries of Messrs. Smith and Murphy were each increased to $500,000 and their target bonus percentages to 100%. As per the employment agreements we entered into with Messrs. Smith and Murphy effective January 15, 2020, base salary of $500,000 was used for calculation of the fiscal 2020 bonus. Fiscal 2020 bonus opportunity was pro-rated between their prior role’s target bonus (65% of salary) and metric mix (80% Division, 20% Corporate) and their current role’s target bonus (100% of salary) and metric mix (100% Corporate).

Effective January 14, 2020, Mr. Debney separated from the company as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director, and effective January 15, 2020, Messrs. Smith and Murphy were appointed Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers. Effective as of the dates Messrs. Smith and Murphy became Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers, their annual base salaries were increased to $500,000.

34    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

For more information regarding the amounts paid as base salary to our named executive officers, see “Executive Compensation — Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table.”

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation

Our fiscal 2020 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program is an annual performance-based cash incentive program. The program provides each participant, including our named executive officers, with an opportunity to earn cash incentive compensation based on attainment of pre-established company-wide or division objective financial performance metrics and, from time to time, individual performance goals. Each participant is assigned an incentive bonus opportunity expressed as a percentage of base pay, or a target percentage, and objective financial performance metrics are established with varying weightings totaling 100%. For each financial performance metric, threshold, target, and maximum performance levels are set. A participant’s final cash incentive compensation is calculated by multiplying the participant’s target percentage by the weighted average percentage calculated for each financial performance metric. A participant’s cash incentive compensation cannot exceed 300% of the individual’s bonus opportunity, and eligibility for the payment of any award is subject to the continued employment of the participant through the end of the fiscal year.

Fiscal 2020 Performance Metrics

For fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee established the following performance metrics and weightings for the named executive officers for company-wide and division performance metrics and weightings as set forth below.

Company-Wide Performance Metrics

·

Company Revenue — weighted 50% for Messrs. Debney, Buchanan, and Cicero, and approximately 10% for Messrs. Smith, Murphy, and Tobiassen and then weighted 50% for Messrs. Smith and Murphy for the period following their appointment as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers on January 15, 2020.

·

Company Adjusted EBITDAS — weighted 50% for Messrs. Debney, Buchanan, and Cicero, and approximately 10% for Messrs. Smith, Murphy, and Tobiassen and then weighted 50% for Messrs. Smith and Murphy for the period following their appointment as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers on January 15, 2020.

Company Adjusted EBITDAS also served as the threshold, for which the failure to achieve such performance metric would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the other company-wide or individual performance metrics.

“Adjusted EBITDAS,” for the purposes of compensation, means our company’s net income as reported in our Form 10-K adding back interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash stock compensation expense, and any nonrecurring expenses as determined by the Committee as set forth in the Program or at any time thereafter. For fiscal year 2020, the Committee has determined that such nonrecurring expenses shall include (i) accelerated expenses related to the repurchase or refinance of the Company’s outstanding bonds or Credit Facility, if any; (ii) fair value inventory step-up and backlog expense; (iii) all acquisition or merger related expenses associated with negotiating, conducting diligence, and closing for any acquired company or merger; (iv) any transition costs related to the one-time initial transfer of existing inventory to the new Distribution Center from UST, Springfield, and legacy Columbia facilities (which costs are not included in the budget in an amount not to exceed $500,000.00); (v) severance/retention and asset impairment costs related to the closing of the UST

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        35


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

facility; (vi) severance/retention and asset impairment costs relating to the transition of Crimson Trace into the Columbia operations; (vii) changes in contingent consideration; (viii) impairment charges for goodwill or intangible assets; (ix) costs incurred relating to shareholder, activism; (x) cost related to the separation from our company of our former President and Chief Executive Officer; and (xi) the tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments. To the extent practicable, each amount shall be calculated based upon the numbers used in the audited financial statements and, if possible, in the same amount as reported in the Form 10-K.

Segment and Division Performance Metrics

·

Revenue — weighted 0% for Messrs. Debney, Buchanan, and Cicero; 40% for Mr. Smith based on our Firearm segment revenue (a combination of our Firearm division and our Manufacturing Services division); 40% for Mr. Murphy based on Outdoor Products & Accessories segment revenue; 40% for Mr. Tobiassen based on Firearm division revenue; and then weighted 0% for Messrs. Smith and Murphy for the period following their appointment as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers on January 15, 2020.

·

Adjusted EBITDAS — weighted 0% for Messrs. Debney, Buchanan, and Cicero; 40% for Mr. Smith based on our Firearm segment Adjusted EBITDAS (a combination of our Firearm division and our Manufacturing Services division); 40% for Mr. Murphy based on Outdoor Products & Accessories segment Adjusted EBITDAS; 40% for Mr. Tobiassen based on Firearm division Adjusted EBITDAS; and then weighted 0% for Messrs. Smith and Murphy for the period following their appointment as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers on January 15, 2020.

Division Adjusted EBITDAS also served as a hurdle, for which the failure to achieve such performance metric would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the other division performance metrics.

Individual Performance Goals

There were no individual performance goals for fiscal 2020.

In establishing the company-wide and division performance metrics, the Compensation Committee recognized the very challenging environment for our business discussed above.

The company-wide financial performance metrics established under the fiscal 2020 program were as follows:

  Performance Metrics  Target
Performance
(in 000’s)
   Potential
Maximum
Payout of
Target
Bonus
  Performance
Required to
Earn Maximum
Payout (as a %
of Target
Performance)
 

Revenue

  $664,212    300.0%  129.2%

Adjusted EBITDAS

  $118,956    300.0%  132.6%

The failure to reach the threshold metric of at least $95,165,000, or 80% of Target, for Adjusted EBITDAS metric for our company would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the revenue metrics.

36    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

The financial performance metrics established for the fiscal 2020 program for the Firearm division were as follows:

  Performance Metrics  Target
Performance
(in 000’s)
   Potential
Maximum
Payout of
Target
Bonus
  Performance
Required to
Earn Maximum
Payout (as a %
of Target
Performance)
 

Revenue

  $480,000    300.0%  129.9%

Adjusted EBITDAS

  $140,867    300.0%  132.6%

The failure to reach the threshold metric of at least $112,694,000 for the Adjusted EBITDAS metric for the Firearm division would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the revenue metric for such division by Mr. Tobiassen.

The financial performance metrics established for the fiscal 2020 program for the Firearm segment (a combination of our Firearm division and our Manufacturing Services division) were as follows:

  Performance Metrics  Target
Performance
(in 000’s)
   Potential
Maximum
Payout of
Target
Bonus
  Performance
Required to
Earn Maximum
Payout (as a %
of Target
Performance)
 

Revenue

  $491,993    300.0%  129.3%

Adjusted EBITDAS

  $141,523    300.0%  132.6%

The failure to reach the threshold metric of at least $113,218,000 for the Adjusted EBITDAS metric for the Firearm segment would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the revenue metric for such division by Mr. Smith.

The financial performance metrics established under the fiscal 2020 program for the Outdoor Products & Accessories segment were as follows:

  Performance Metrics  Target
Performance
(in 000’s)
   Potential
Maximum
Payout of
Target
Bonus
  Performance
Required to
Earn Maximum
Payout (as a %
of Target
Performance)
 

Revenue

  $190,900    300.0%  126.8%

Adjusted EBITDAS

  $39,091    300.0%  132.6%

The failure to reach the threshold metric of at least $31,273,000 for the Adjusted EBITDAS metric for the Outdoor Products & Accessories segment would result in no bonus payments regardless of the achievement of the revenue metric for such segment for Mr. Murphy.

In fiscal 2020, consolidated revenue (excluding the impact of the federal excise tax adjustment, which inflated revenue in a manner not contemplated when target metrics were established) and Adjusted EBITDAS, for purposes of compensation, were $640.9 million and $115.9 million, respectively, compared with $638.3 million and $111.3 million, respectively, in fiscal 2019. This growth

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        37


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

of 0.4% and 4.1%, respectively, compared very favorably to the financial performance of our direct competitors, Vista Outdoor Inc. that reported declines in revenue and Adjusted EBITDAS of 14.7% and 9.8%, respectively, for their fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 and Sturm, Ruger & Co. that reported declines in revenue and Adjusted EBITDAS of 12.2% and 22.6%, respectively, for their trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2020.

The table below sets forth for each named executive officer the annual fiscal 2020 base salary, the target bonus percentage, the annualized target cash bonus opportunity, and the actual bonus paid for fiscal 2020 reflected as a percentage of target bonus opportunity and in cash:

  Name  

Annual

Fiscal 2020

Base Salary (1)

   Target Bonus
Percentage
  Annualized
Target Cash
Bonus
Opportunity
   

Actual Bonus
paid for Fiscal
2020 (as a % of

Target Bonus
Opportunity)

  Actual Bonus
Paid for Fiscal
2020
 

Mark P. Smith (2)

  $500,000    75.2% $376,161    95.5% $359,341 

Brian D. Murphy (2)

  $500,000    75.2% $376,161    73.4% $275,957 

P. James Debney (3)

  $749,700    100.0% $749,700    % $ 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  $423,602    75.0% $317,701    90.8% $288,338 

Robert J. Cicero

  $357,414    65.0% $232,319    90.8% $210,847 

Lane Tobiassen

  $315,087    65.0 $204,807    98.3% $201,351 

(1)

Base salaries increased 3.0% for each of Messrs. Smith, Murphy, Buchanan, and Cicero, 8.0% for Mr. Murphy, and 10% for Mr. Tobiassen in May 2019.

(2)

Effective with their appointment as of January 15, 2020 as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, the annual base salaries of Messrs. Smith and Murphy were each increased to $500,000 and their target bonus percentages to 100%. As per the employment agreements we entered into with Messrs. Smith and Murphy effective January 15, 2020, their base salary of $500,000 was used for the calculation of the fiscal 2020 bonus. Fiscal 2020 bonus opportunity was pro-rated between their prior role’s target bonus (65% of salary) and metric mix (80% Division, 20% Corporate) and their current role’s target bonus (100% of salary) and metric mix (100% Corporate).

(3)

Effective January 14, 2020, Mr. Debney separated from the company as President and Chief Executive Officer. No bonus was paid to Mr. Debney for fiscal 2020 as he was not employed at the end of the fiscal year.

Except for Mr. Debney, each of our named executive officers received cash incentive compensation for our company-wide or divisional financial performance as a result of our achieving at least threshold performance against the pre-established metrics set out in our Fiscal 2020 Cash Incentive Compensation Program.

2023 Stock-Based Compensation

. During fiscal 2020,2023, grants of annual stock-based compensation to our named executive officersNEOs consisted of RSUs and PSUs, with a weighting of 40% for RSUs and 60% for PSUs. In determining the equity awardawards granted to each executive officer, during fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee considered the dollar value of the awards granted to each executive officer; previous grants to our executive officers; each executive officer’s position with our company; the performance, contributions, skills, experience, and responsibilities of each executive officer; the cost of the stock-based compensation to our company; each executive officer’s total compensation in relationship to the market data; and the overall performance of our company.factors discussed above.

The Compensation Committee maintained stock holding requirements (originally adopted in fiscal 2015) for the shares underlying outstanding stock-based awards granted to our executive officers

38    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

in fiscal 2020 so that vested shares generally will not be delivered and therefore, at a minimum, cannot be sold until the first anniversary of each applicable vesting date. The Compensation Committee implemented this requirement to further align our executive officers with our stockholders, to enhance the long-term focus of our stock-based awards, and to foster executive retention.

During fiscal 2020,2023, we granted the following RSUs and PSUs to our named executive officers:NEOs:

  Name  PSUs at
Threshold
   PSUs at
Target
   PSUs at
Maximum
 

Mark P. Smith

   17,051    44,871    89,742 

Brian D. Murphy

   17,051    44,871    89,742 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

            

Robert J. Cicero

   6,090    16,025    32,050 

P. James Debney

            

Lane Tobiassen

            

Name

 

RSUs

 

 

PSUs at
Threshold

 

 

PSUs at
Target

 

 

PSUs at
Maximum

 

Mark P. Smith

 

 

41,834

 

 

 

23,845

 

 

 

62,750

 

 

 

125,500

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

 

12,894

 

 

 

7,349

 

 

 

19,340

 

 

 

38,680

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

 

8,883

 

 

 

5,062

 

 

 

13,323

 

 

 

26,646

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

 

8,883

 

 

 

5,062

 

 

 

13,323

 

 

 

26,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a result of their appointments as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers of our company, the Compensation Committee in April 2020 granted

RSUs vest one-fourth following each of Mr. Smiththe first, second, third, and Mr. Murphy PSUs covering up to 89,742 sharesfourth anniversaries of common stock. Mr. Debney separated from our company effective January 14, 2020. Mr. Buchanan retired from our company and Mr. Tobiassen left our company in conjunction with the Separation.grant date.

These PSUs are earned and vest based on the relative performance of our market capitalization combined with the market capitalization of AOUT after the Separationcommon stock against the RUT over the approximately three-year performance period following the date of grant. If the relative performance of our market capitalization combined with the market capitalization of AOUT after the Separationcommon stock (measured based on the average combined market capitalizationclosing price of our common stock and AOUT during the 90-calendar-day-period preceding approximately the third anniversary of the date of grant against the average market capitalization

25 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

closing price of our common stock and that of AOUT during the 90-calendar-day-period immediately following the date of grant) does not equal or exceed the relative performance of the RUT (measured based on the average market capitalizationclosing price of the RUT during the 90-calendar-day-period preceding approximately the third anniversary of the date of grant against the average closing price of the RUT during the 90-calendar-day-period immediately following the date of grant), then no PSUs subject to the awards will be earned and vest. If the relative performance of our common stock in terms of the market capitalization of our company combined with the market capitalization of AOUT equals the relative performance of the RUT, then 38% of the PSUs subject to the awards (at target) will be earned and vest, or the threshold award. If the relative performance of our common stock in terms of the market capitalization of our company combined with the market capitalization of AOUT exceeds the relative performance of the RUT by up to five points, then the PSUs subject to the awards will be earned and vest on a straight-line basis from the threshold award level up to the target award level, with 100% of the PSUs subject to the awards (the target number of PSUs) being earned and vesting if the relative performance of our common stock in terms of the market capitalization of our company combined with the market capitalization of AOUT exceeds the relative performance of the RUT by five points. If the relative performance of our common stock in terms of the market capitalization of our company combined with the market capitalization of AOUT exceeds the relative performance of the RUT by over five points up to a level of 10 points, then the PSUs subject to the awards will be earned and vest on a straight-line basis up to the maximum award, with 200% of the PSUs subject to the awards (the maximum number of PSUs) being earned and vesting if the relative performance of our common stock in terms of the market capitalization of our company combined with the market capitalization of AOUT exceeds the relative performance of the RUT by 10 points or more.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        39


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

The underlying shares of our common stock earned, if any, relatedrelating to these PSUs will be delivered onas soon as practical after the first anniversary of the May 1st ending date of the performance period.period and confirmation by the Compensation Committee of the performance achievement. The maximum number of shares that can be delivered with respect to the fiscal 20202023 PSU awards is limited to a dollar value, determined as of the vesting date, of 600% of the grant date value. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Introduction — Highlights of Fiscal 2020 Compensation Program.”

Upon a change in control of our companythe Company prior to the three year anniversary of the date of any PSU grant, each named executive officerPSU award recipient will earn a number of PSUs subject to the award in accordance with the formula described above, provided that (i) the relative performance of our common stock will be measured based on the consideration offered for one share of our common stock in the change in control to calculate our market capitalization (or in the event of a change in control that does not involve an acquisition of our stock, based on the trading price of our common stock on the date of the change in control to calculate our market capitalization) against the average closing price of our common stock during the 90-calendar-day period immediately following the date of grant; and (ii) the relative performance of the RUT will be measured based on the average closing price of the RUT during the 90-calendar-day-period immediately prior to the change in control against the average closing price of the RUT during the 90-calendar-day-period immediately following the date of grant. The PSUs earned pursuant to the formula described above will then be converted into RSUs that will vest upon the earlier of (i) a qualifying termination of employment or (ii) the original vesting date.

During fiscal 2020 we also granted the following RSUs to our named executive officers:

  NameRSUs

Mark P. Smith

44,872

Brian D. Murphy

44,872

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

Robert J. Cicero

24,026

P. James Debney

Lane Tobiassen

As a result of their appointments of Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee in April 2020 granted each of Mr. Smith and Mr. Murphy RSUs covering 44,872 shares of common stock. In recognition of his efforts in connection with the Separation, in March 2020, Mr. Cicero received RSUs covering 8,000 shares of common stock. Mr. Debney separated from our company effective January 14, 2020, Mr. Buchanan retired from our company and Mr. Tobiassen left our company in conjunction with the Separation.

These RSUs vest one-fourth on May 1st following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to each named executive officer’s continued service with us, and the underlying shares are delivered on the one-year anniversary of the applicable vesting date. These RSUs will vest in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control of our company (as defined in the applicable award agreements).

For more information regarding the grants of stock-based compensation to our named executive officers in fiscal 2020, see “Executive Compensation — Fiscal 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

Each named executive officer forfeits the unvested portion, if any, of this stock-based compensation if his service to our company is terminated for any reason, except as otherwise set forth in the applicable award agreement, in any employment or severance agreement between our company

40    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

and the named executive officer, in any policy or plan of our company applicable to the named executive officer, or as may otherwise be determined by the administrator of the applicable equity plan. See “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Certain Stock-Based Compensation Arrangements Granted in Prior Fiscal Years

Results for Previous PSU Awards

Payout. The PSUs granted in fiscal 20172020 to our executive officers, which had a three-year performance period ending May 1, 2020,2023, were not earned because our common stockmarket capitalization combined with the market capitalization of AOUT did not meet the thresholdminimum performance requirements compared with the RUT. Over the three-year performance period, our stock price declined 60.10%market capitalization combined with the market capitalization of AOUT depreciated 29.0% while the RUT appreciated 4.64%31.0%. As a result, the Compensation Committee confirmed that this underperformance resulted in none of the PSUs granted in fiscal 20172020 not being earned, and therefore, our named executive officers did not receive anyNEOs who received the 2020 award received none of the target shares of common stock underlying the PSUs granted in fiscal 2017.2020.

Other ElementsAdjustments for the Separation. In connection with the Separation, our outstanding stock-based awards were adjusted in a manner intended to maintain the intrinsic value of Fiscal 2020the RSUs and PSUs immediately prior to the Separation. The RSUs and PSUs held by our directors and executives generally were converted into RSUs or PSUs of us and AOUT, such that each such holder would (i) continue to hold the existing RSU or PSU in us covering the same number of shares of our common stock that were subject to the RSU or PSU prior to the Separation and (ii) receive an identical RSU or PSU covering one share of AOUT common stock for each four shares of our common stock covered by the RSU or PSU in us, resulting in the RSUs or PSUs for us, and AOUT, having a combined intrinsic value immediately after the Separation as before the Separation, taking into account any necessary adjustments to the exercise price to maintain

26 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

such intrinsic value. In addition, to the extent the existing award of us is subject to the achievement of certain company performance-based target goals, appropriate adjustments were made to such target goals and incorporated into the new awards to reflect the changes to the businesses as a result of the Separation. The number of shares covered by RSUs in us held by other employees were adjusted so that the RSUs had the same intrinsic value immediately following the Separation as before the Separation. To the extent the existing award is subject to vesting based upon continued service, the new awards also remained subject to the same vesting conditions based upon continued employment with the holder’s post-Separation employer.

Benefits and Perquisites

Our executives are eligible to participate in those health, welfare, and retirement plans generally available to employees who meet applicable eligibility requirements – including our profit sharing, 401(k), employee stock purchase, and medical and disability plans. In addition, from time to time, we may provide our executive officers with other benefits and perquisites that we believe are reasonable – including severance and change-in-control benefits, car allowances, housing allowances, relocation assistance, a nonqualified supplemental deferred compensation plan, and insurance premium reimbursement.

We do not view perquisites and other personal benefits as a significant element of our executive compensation program, but believe they can be useful in attracting, motivating, and retaining executive talent. We believe these additional benefits may assist our executives in performing their duties and provide time efficiencies in appropriate circumstances. We may provide additional benefits and perquisites to our executives in the future as an element of their overall compensation. All future practices will be approved and subject to periodic review by the Compensation Committee.

ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION MATTERS

Consideration of Risk in Compensation Policies

We have assessed the compensation policies and practices with respect to our employees, including our executive officers, and concluded that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits our deductibility, for federal income tax purposes, of compensation paid to each of our NEOs in excess of $1 million per person per year.

Taxation of “Parachute” Payments

Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers and directors and certain other service providers may be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control of a company that exceeds certain prescribed limits and that the company (or a successor) may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. We did not provide any executive officer, including any NEO, with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that the executive officer might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G and 4999 during fiscal 2023, and we have not agreed and are not otherwise obligated to provide any executive officer with such a “gross-up” or other reimbursement.

Derivative Trading and Hedging

See “Board and Governance Matters—Additional Governance Matters—Director and Officer Derivative Trading and Hedging.”

27 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

Clawback Policy

We maintain a compensation recovery, or clawback, policy. In the event we are required to restate our financial results as a result of a material noncompliance by us with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, we will have the right to use reasonable efforts to recover from any current or former executive officer who received incentive compensation (whether cash or equity) from us during the three-year period preceding the date on which we were required to prepare the accounting restatement, any excess incentive compensation awarded as a result of the misstatement. This policy is administered by the Compensation Committee. If final rulesWe have adopted a new clawback policy that will take effect within 60 days of the effective date of certain amendments to the applicable Nasdaq listing rules.

Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors and executive officers. Our non-employee directors and executive officers are adoptedrequired to own shares of our common stock or share equivalents with a value equal to at least the lesser of the following:

  Position

Target Ownership

Non-Employee Directors

3x cash retainer or 21,000 shares or share equivalents

CEO

3x base salary or 161,000 shares or share equivalents

CFO

2x base salary or 34,000 shares or share equivalents

Other Executive Officers

2x base salary or 26,000 shares or share equivalents

Each individual has five years from the date of his or her appointment as a director or an executive officer to achieve the required ownership levels. For these purposes, stock ownership generally includes shares directly owned by the SEC regarding clawbackindividual (including any shares over which the individual has sole ownership, voting, or investment power); shares owned by the individual’s minor children and spouse and by other related individuals and entities over whose shares the individual has custody, voting control, or power of disposition; shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable or will be vested and deliverable within 60 days; shares underlying PSUs that have vested, but are not deliverable within 60 days if the performance requirements have been satisfied; and shares held in trust for the benefit of the individual. Failure to satisfy the required ownership level may result in the ineligibility of the individual to receive stock-based compensation, in the case of an executive officer or director, or inability to be a nominee for election to the Board, in the case of a director.

Employment Agreements

We do not maintain employment agreements with any of our NEOs, except Mr. Smith.

Mr. Smith. On April 4, 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Smith, pursuant to which he is (a) entitled to an annual base salary that is subject to annual review by the Board and (b) eligible to participate in our executive compensation programs, to receive a discretionary annual cash bonus under our annual cash incentive program as determined by the Board, and to receive annual and periodic stock-based compensation awards as determined by the Board. Mr. Smith is entitled to receive other standard benefits, including a car allowance of $1,500 per month; participation in any group health insurance, pension, retirement, vacation, expense reimbursement, relocation program, and other plans, programs, and benefits approved by the Board and made available from time to time to our other executives; and certain insurance benefits.

If we unilaterally terminate Mr. Smith’s employment without cause, he will receive (i) his base salary for 18 months after the termination; (ii) a pro rata portion of his annual cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs to the extent earned under the Dodd-Frank Act, we will review this policythen applicable executive annual cash incentive program; (iii) a car allowance for 18 months after termination; (iv) at our option, either (x) coverage under our medical plan to the extent provided for him pursuant to his employment agreement at termination, such benefits to

28 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Compensation Matters

be received for 18 months thereafter or (y) reimbursement for the COBRA premium for such coverage through the earlier of the 18-month period or the COBRA eligibility period; and make any amendments as necessary(v) a vested pro rata portion of stock-based awards scheduled to comply with the new rules.

This clawback policy applies to cash and stock-based incentive compensation programs, including our 2013 Incentive Stock Plan and our 2013 Incentive Bonus Plan.

Derivative Trading and Hedging

We have a policy prohibiting our directors and officers, including our executive officers, and any family member residingvest in the same household, from engaging in derivatives trading and hedging involving our securities or pledging or margining our common stock.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m)fiscal year of the termination.

If Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by reason of his death or disability, if Mr. Smith unilaterally terminates his employment, or if Mr. Smith engages in an act or acts involving a crime, moral turpitude, fraud or dishonesty, or he willfully violates in a material respect our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code generally limits our deductibility,of Conduct, or Code of Ethics for federal income tax purposes,the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, he will receive no further base compensation under his employment agreement.

If Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by reason of compensation paid to eachhis death or disability, if we unilaterally terminate Mr. Smith’s employment without cause, or if Mr. Smith voluntarily terminates his employment, or is terminated by us, following a qualifying change in control event as described below, he will receive, for the fiscal year of our chief executive officer and the next three highest-paid named executive officers (other thannotice of termination, any earned bonus, on a pro-rated basis, based on the chief financial officer solelyperformance goals actually achieved for taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2018)the fiscal year of the notice of termination, as determined in excessthe sole discretion of $1 million per person per year. For taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2018, certain compensation, including qualified performance-based compensation, was not subject to this annual deduction limit if certain requirements were met.

For taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2018, when reasonably practicable, the Compensation Committee sought to qualifyBoard, at the variable incentive compensationtime such bonuses are paid to our executive officers for the qualified performance-based compensation exemption from the deductibility limit. other employees.

The Compensation Committee, however, had the discretion to authorize compensation paymentsagreement provides that, did

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        41


  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

not comply with this exemption when it believed that such payments were in the best interestsevent of our company and our stockholders, such as, for example, in order to attract or retain executive talent.

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, this $1 million annual deduction limit will apply to all our named executive officers, including our chief financial officer, and the exemption for qualified performance-based compensation will no longer be available. As a result, compensation paid to each of our named executive officers in any taxable year in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the transition relief applicable to certain compensation arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017, including certain stock options and performance shares granted prior to such date. Because of the absence of formal guidance under the transition relief provisions, though, we cannot guarantee that any compensation arrangements intended to qualify for the exemption under Section 162(m) will actually receive such treatment.

Taxation of “Parachute” Payments

Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code, or Sections 280G and 4999, provide that executive officers and directors and certain other service providers may be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control of a company that exceeds certain prescribed limits,(as defined therein), Mr. Smith may, at his option and that the company (or a successor) may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subjectupon written notice to this additional tax. We did not provide any executive officer, including any named executive officer, with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that the executive officer might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G and 4999 during fiscal 2020, and we have not agreed and are not otherwise obligated to provide any executive officer with such a “gross-up” or other reimbursement.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance withus, terminate his employment, unless (i) the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation,”his employment agreement remain in full force and effect and (ii) he suffers no reduction in his status, duties, authority, or ASC Topic 718. ASC Topic 718 requires companiescompensation following the change in control, provided that he will be considered to measuresuffer a reduction in his status, duties, or authority if, after the change in control, (a) he is not the CEO of the company that succeeds to our business; (b) such company’s stock is not listed on a national stock exchange; or (c) such company terminates his employment or reduces his status, duties, authority, or compensation expensewithin one year of the change in control. If, within one year of a change of control, Mr. Smith terminates his employment because of the change in control following which the employment agreement does not remain in full force and effect or his status, duties, authority, or compensation have been reduced, or such company terminates Mr. Smith, he will receive (A) his base salary for 18 months; (B) an amount equal to 150% of the average of his cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding his termination, which will be paid over the 18-month period; (C) his car allowance for 18 months; and (D) at our option, either (x) coverage under our medical plan to the extent provided for him at the date of termination for 18 months or (y) reimbursement for the COBRA premium for such coverage through the earlier of such 18-month period or the COBRA eligibility period. In addition, all unvested stock-based compensation held by Mr. Smith in his capacity as an employee on the effective date of the termination will vest as of the effective date of such termination.

The employment agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that apply for 18 months following termination.

Severance Plan Benefits

The Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. Executive Severance Pay Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) is intended to provide severance pay to certain eligible executives whose employment is terminated under certain circumstances. All of our NEOs participated in the Executive Severance Plan during fiscal 2023, except Mr. Smith, whose severance eligibility is covered under other agreements.

Subject to certain conditions, if we terminate a participating executive without good cause (other than due to death or disability) or a participating executive resigns for good reason (each as defined therein), he or she will receive certain payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Executive Severance Plan. These payments and benefits include continuation of base salary for six months, a lump sum cash payment equal to the average of the cash incentive bonuses paid to the executive for each of the preceding two fiscal years, vesting of all stock-based payment awards madecompensation granted to employeesthe executive in his or her capacity as an employee, and directors, including stock options and deferred stock units, based onreimbursement for the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below, even though our executive officers may never realize any value from their awards. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that an executive officer is required to render service in exchangehealthcare continuation coverage for the optionparticipating executive and his or other award. In determining stock-based compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the potential expense of these awards under ASC Topic 718 and the impact on our company.her eligible dependents for six months. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

29 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


42    

Compensation Matters

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statementProxy Statement and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to ourthe Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement.

Dated August 22, 2020

Respectfully submitted,

John B. Furman, Chairman

Compensation Committee:Barry M. Monheit, Chairman; Anita D. Britt; Fred M. Diaz; John B. Furman; and Michelle J. Lohmeier

Gregory J. Gluchowski, Jr. – Served untilCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

August 23, 2020.During fiscal 2023, Messrs. Diaz, Furman, and Monheit and Ms. Britt served on the Compensation Committee. None of these individuals had any material contractual or other relationships with us during the fiscal year, except as directors. During fiscal 2023, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or board of directors of any entity whose executive officers serve as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee.

I. Marie Wadecki – Served until August 23,

2020.

LOGO2020

30 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    43

img125871598_6.jpg 



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table

FISCAL 2023 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020, 2019,2023, 2022, and 2018,2021, information with respect to compensation for services in all capacities to us and our subsidiaries earned by our Co-PresidentsNEOs.

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

 

Bonus
(1)

 

 

Stock
Awards
(2)

 

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)

 

 

 

All Other
Compensation
(4)

 

 

Total (5)

 

Mark P. Smith

 

2023

 

$

721,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,502,872

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

81,849

 

 

$

2,305,721

 

President and Chief

 

2022

 

$

700,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,371,850

 

 

 

648,895

 

 

 

$

101,153

 

 

$

2,821,898

 

Executive Officer

 

2021

 

$

519,231

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,068,599

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

$

117,110

 

 

$

2,704,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

2023

 

$

412,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

463,202

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

60,501

 

 

$

935,703

 

Executive Vice President,

 

2022

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

422,095

 

 

$

259,558

 

 

 

$

65,880

 

 

$

1,147,533

 

Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer, and Assistant
Secretary

 

2021

 

$

379,038

 

 

$

25,000

 

 

$

173,500

 

 

$

474,500

 

 

 

$

66,976

 

 

$

1,119,014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin A. Maxwell (6)

 

2023

 

$

350,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

319,100

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

16,167

 

 

$

685,267

 

Senior Vice President,

 

2022

 

$

163,462

 

 

$

50,000

 

 

$

349,994

 

 

$

97,662

 

 

 

$

7,362

 

 

$

668,480

 

General Counsel, Chief

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compliance Officer, and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secretary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

2023

 

$

309,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

319,100

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

46,352

 

 

$

674,452

 

Vice President, Sales

 

2022

 

$

299,519

 

 

$

 

 

$

290,190

 

 

$

180,764

 

 

 

$

62,575

 

 

$

833,048

 

 

 

2021

 

$

285,577

 

 

$

 

 

$

451,250

 

 

$

357,500

 

 

 

$

61,073

 

 

$

1,155,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) The amounts shown in this column represent the amount Mr. Maxwell received upon hire in fiscal 2022 and Co-Chief Executive Officers,a discretionary bonus that Ms. McPherson received in recognition of her efforts in connection with the Separation. No other discretionary bonuses were paid to our former PresidentNEOs.

(2) The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value for PSUs and Chief Executive Officer,RSUs granted to the NEOs during the covered year calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718 excluding the effect of forfeitures. The assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of these awards are set forth in Note 13 to our former Chief Financial Officer,consolidated financial statements, which are included in our Form 10-K. For further information on these awards, see “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and eachAnalysis — Compensation Elements — Stock-Based Compensation” and “Fiscal 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below and the narrative discussion that follows.

Set forth below is the maximum value for the PSUs granted to the NEOs during fiscal 2023 (i.e., 200% of the target award value).

Name

 

Stock Awards
Maximum Value
of PSUs

 

Mark P. Smith

 

$

1,818,495

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

$

560,473

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

$

386,101

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

$

386,101

 

 

 

 

 

(3) The amounts shown in this column constitute payments made, if any, under our 2023, 2022, and 2021 annual performance-based cash incentive compensation programs. These amounts were calculated and paid to our NEOs in the fiscal year following when they were earned. For a description of our two other most highly compensated executive officers aspayments in fiscal 2023, see “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Elements — Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”

(4) All Other Compensation consisted of the end of our last completedfollowing for fiscal year, or collectively our named executive officers.2023:

  Name and

  Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Bonus
(1)
  Stock
Awards
(2)
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
  All Other
Compensation
(4)
  

Total

(5)

 

Mark P. Smith (6)

  2020  $394,193  $  $643,457  $  $359,341  $31,616  $1,428,607 

    Co-President and Co-Chief

    Executive Officer

  2019  $346,541  $  $258,800  $  $509,889  $28,683  $1,143,913 
  2018  $339,709  $  $296,752  $  $  $22,877  $659,338 

Brian D. Murphy (7)

  2020  $359,265  $  $643,457  $  $275,957  $83,330  $1,362,008 

    Co-President and Co-Chief

    Executive Officer

  2019  $291,551  $  $258,800  $  $262,461  $87,014  $899,826 
  2018  $283,091  $160,000  $296,752  $     $15,238  $755,081 

P. James Debney (8)

  2020  $553,625  $  $  $  $  $1,067,372  $1,620,997 

    Former President and Chief

    Executive Officer

  2019  $749,261  $  $1,263,474  $  $1,696,285  $49,903  $3,759,023 
  2018  $734,039  $  $1,448,758  $  $  $46,039  $2,228,836 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan (9)

  2020  $423,270  $  $  $  $288,338  $59,467  $771,075 

    Executive Vice President,

    Chief Financial Officer,

    Chief Administrative

    Officer, and Treasurer

  2019  $411,078  $  $453,198  $  $697,900  $54,372  $1,616,548 
  2018  $402,831  $  $519,658  $     $50,290  $972,779 
        
        

Robert J. Cicero

  2020  $357,134  $  $280,125  $  $210,847  $31,489  $879,595 

    Senior Vice President,

    General Counsel, Chief

    Compliance Officer, and Secretary

  2019  $346,847  $  $258,800  $  $510,339  $30,325  $1,146,311 
  2018  $339,715  $  $296,752  $  $  $25,501  $661,968 
        

Lane A. Tobiassen (10)

  2020  $314,316  $  $  $  $201,351  $26,162  $541,829 

    President, Firearms

  2019  $291,599  $  $258,800  $  $84,254  $15,879  $650,532 
  2018  $277,788  $  $296,752  $  $  $6,235  $580,775 

(1)

The amounts shown in this column, if any, represent discretionary bonuses. Mr. Murphy received a discretionary cash bonus of $160,000 in fiscal 2018 in recognition of the expansion of the nature and scope of his job functions and responsibilities and his subsequent strong performance as our newly appointed President of our Outdoor Products & Accessories division. No other discretionary bonuses were paid to our named executive officers.

(2)

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value for PSUs and RSUs granted to the named executive officers during the covered year calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718 excluding the effect of forfeitures. The assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of these awards are set forth in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020. For further information on these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2020 Compensation — Stock-Based Compensation” and “Fiscal 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below and the narrative discussion that follows. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Introduction — Highlights of Fiscal 2020 Compensation Program” for certain changes affecting fiscal 2020 compensation for our named executive officers.

img125871598_5.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 31


44    

Executive Compensation

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Set forth below is the maximum value for the PSUs granted to the named executive officers during fiscal 2020 (i.e., 200% of the target award value).

  Name  

Stock Awards –

Maximum Value of
PSUs

 

Mark P. Smith

  $690,116 

Brian D. Murphy

  $690,116 

P. James Debney

  $ 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  $ 

Robert J. Cicero

  $246,465 

Lane A. Tobiassen

  $ 

(3)

The amounts shown in this column constitute payments made, if any, under our 2020, 2019, and 2018 annual performance-based cash incentive compensation programs. These amounts were calculated and paid to our named executive officers in the fiscal year following when they were earned. For fiscal 2018, none of our named executive officers received cash incentive compensation for our company-wide or division financial performance as a result of our failure to achieve the pre-established company and division financial targets set out in our fiscal 2018 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program. For a description of our Fiscal 2020 Cash Incentive Compensation Program see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2020 Compensation — Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”

(4)

All Other Compensation consisted of the following for fiscal 2020:

  Name Car
Allowance
  Reimbursement
for Insurance
Premiums (4a)
  Matching
Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plan
  Payments
Under Profit
Sharing
Plan (4b)
  Housing
Allowance
  Severance
Payments
  Other  Total (5) 

Mark P. Smith (6)

 $13,200  $3,554  $7,142  $7,720  $  $  $  $31,616 

Brian D. Murphy (7)

 $13,200  $855  $8,887  $7,720  $  $  $52,668(11)  $83,330 

P. James Debney (8)

 $9,000  $48,231(4c)  $1,311  $  $  $999,996  $8,834(12)  $1,067,372 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan (9)

 $12,000  $6,035  $4,878  $7,720  $25,000  $  $3,834(13)  $59,467 

Robert J. Cicero

 $10,800  $4,473  $8,496  $7,720  $  $  $  $31,489 

Lane A. Tobiassen (10)

 $10,800  $890  $6,752  $7,720  $  $  $  $26,162 

(4a)

Except as otherwise indicated, the amounts shown in this column consist of reimbursement of disability insurance premiums.

(4b)

Profit sharing amounts earned in fiscal 2020 that exceeded the 401(k) maximum contribution limit will be contributed to the Nonqualified Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan upon payout in fiscal 2021. For further information, see “Retirement Plans — Nonqualified Supplement Deferred Compensation Plan” below.

(4c)

Consists of reimbursement of premiums for disability insurance ($7,999), healthcare insurance ($7,282), the cost of COBRA during the 12-month severance period ($25,882) and a $5.0 million term life insurance policy ($7,068).

(5)

The dollar value in this column for each named executive officer represents the sum of all compensation reflected in the previous columns.

(6)

Mr. Smith served as President, Manufacturing Services of our company until January 14, 2020. He served as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of our company from January 15, 2020 until August 23, 2020 when he became the sole President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company, in connection with the Separation.

(7)

Mr. Murphy served as President, Outdoor Products & Accessories Division of our company until January 14, 2020. He served as Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of our company from January 15, 2020 until August 23, 2020 when he resigned from our company to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of AOUT as an independent, publicly traded company following the Separation.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        45


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Name

 

Car
Allowance

 

 

Reimbursement
for Insurance
Premiums (4a)

 

 

Matching
Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plan

 

 

Payments
Under Profit
Sharing
Plan (4b)

 

 

Relocation Payments

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Total (5)

 

Mark P. Smith

 

$

18,000

 

 

$

11,042

 

 

$

8,911

 

 

$

27,450

 

 

$

 

 

$

16,447

 

(4c)

 

$

81,849

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

$

12,000

 

 

$

4,198

 

 

$

9,275

 

 

$

27,450

 

 

$

7,543

 

 

$

35

 

(4d)

 

$

60,501

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

$

10,800

 

 

$

78

 

 

$

5,250

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

39

 

(4d)

 

$

16,167

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

$

9,000

 

 

$

623

 

 

$

9,244

 

 

$

27,450

 

 

$

 

 

$

35

 

(4d)

 

$

46,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8)

Effective January 14, 2020, Mr. Debney separated from all positions with our company and entered into a Separation Agreement and Release, dated February 26, 2020, with our company, which was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2020.

(9)

Mr. Buchanan retired as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, and Treasurer of our company in August 2020 in connection with the Separation.

(10)

Mr. Tobiassen separated from our company on August 1, 2020.

(11)

Consists of living expenses and relocation costs.

(12)

Consists of an allowance to remove his personal effects from our corporate offices in connection with his separation on January 14, 2020 ($5,000) and the cost of a country club membership ($3,834).

(13)

Consists of a country club membership.

Fiscal 2020 Grants(4a) Except as otherwise indicated, the amounts shown in this column consist of Plan-Based Awardsreimbursement of disability insurance premiums.

(4b) Profit sharing amounts earned in fiscal 2023 that exceeded the 401(k) maximum contribution limit will be contributed to the Deferred Compensation Plan (as defined below) upon payout in fiscal 2024. For further information, see “Retirement Plans — Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below.

(4c) Consists of a country club membership.

(4d) Consists of federal firearm license fees.

(5) The dollar value in this column for each NEO represents the sum of all compensation reflected in the previous columns.

(6) Compensation information for Mr. Maxwell is provided for only fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2023 because he was not a NEO in fiscal 2021.

FISCAL 2023 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officersNEOs during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020.2023.

     

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards (1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity

Incentive Plan Awards (2)

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares of

Stocks or

Units

(#)

 

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

 

  

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/Sh)

 

  

Grant

Date Fair

Value

of Stock

and

Option

Awards

(3)

 

 

  Name

 

 

Grant Date

 

  

Threshold

($)

 

  

Target

($)

 

  

Maximum

($)

 

  

Threshold

(#)

 

  

Target

(#)

 

  

Maximum

(#)

 

 

Mark P. Smith

  04/06/2020                    $44,872(4)        $298,399 
  04/06/2020           $17,051  $44,871  $89,742           $345,058 

Brian D. Murphy

  04/06/2020           $17,051  $44,871  $89,742  $44,872(4)        $298,399 
  04/06/2020                             $345,058 

P. James Debney

  04/30/2020                               
  04/30/2020                               

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  04/30/2020                               
  04/30/2020                               

Robert J. Cicero

  03/06/2020                    $8,000(5)        $50,320 
  04/06/2020                    $16,026(4)        $106,573 
  04/06/2020           $6,090  $16,025  $32,050           $123,232 

Lane A. Tobiassen

  04/06/2020                               
  04/30/2020                               

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)

 

 

All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock

 

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying

 

 

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option

 

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option

 

Name

 

Grant
Date

 

Threshold
($)

 

 

Target
($)

 

 

Maximum
($)

 

 

Threshold
(#)

 

 

Target
(#)

 

 

Maximum
(#)

 

 

or Units
(#)(3)

 

 

Options
(#)

 

 

Awards
($/Sh)

 

 

Awards
(4)

 

Mark P. Smith

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,834

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

593,624

 

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

23,845

 

 

 

62,750

 

 

 

125,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

909,248

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,894

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

182,966

 

 

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

7,349

 

 

 

19,340

 

 

 

38,680

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

280,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,883

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

126,050

 

 

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

5,063

 

 

 

13,323

 

 

 

26,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

193,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,883

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

126,050

 

 

 

5/2/2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

5,063

 

 

 

13,323

 

 

 

26,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

193,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Our fiscal 2020 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program is discussed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2020 Compensation — Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”

(2)

These PSUs vest based on the relative performance of our common stock against the RUT over the approximately three-year period following the date of grant, and the underlying shares of common stock earned, if any, are deliverable on the first anniversary of the May 1 ending date of the performance period. Notwithstanding the amounts shown in the “Maximum” column, the maximum number of shares that can be delivered with respect to fiscal 2020 PSU grants is limited to a dollar value, determined as of the vesting date, of 600% of the grant date value. For further information on these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2020 Compensation — Stock-Based Compensation.”

(3)

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock awards calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding the effects of forfeitures. The assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of these awards are set forth in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020.

46    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

(4)

One-fourth of the RSUs vest on May 1 following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to each executive’s continued services with us, and the underlying shares of common stock are deliverable on each one-year anniversary of the applicable vesting date.

(5)

In recognition of the extraordinary level of work required to accomplish the Separation, Mr. Cicero was offered a retention agreement valued at $100,000 in the form of a $25,000 cash payment upon successful completion of the Separation and RSUs equal to $75,000. These RSUs vest one year from the grant date and will be delivered on the first anniversary of the vest date.

Reference is made to(1) For a description of our payments in fiscal 2023, see “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — IntroductionCompensation ElementsHighlightsAnnual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”

(2) These PSUs vest based on the relative performance of Fiscal 2020our common stock against the RUT over the approximately three-year period following the date of grant. Notwithstanding the amounts shown in the “Maximum” column, the maximum number of shares that can be delivered with respect to fiscal 2023 PSU grants is limited to a dollar value, determined as of the vesting date, of 600% of the grant date value. For further information on these awards, see “Compensation Matters — Compensation Program” for certain changes affecting fiscal 2020 compensation forDiscussion and Analysis — Compensation Elements — Stock-Based Compensation.”

(3) One-fourth of the RSUs vest on each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to each executive’s continued services with us.

(4) The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock awards calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding the effects of forfeitures. The assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of these awards are set forth in Note 13 to our named executive officers.consolidated financial statements, which are included in our Form 10-K.

32 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2020 2023

The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officersNEOs as of April 30, 2020.2023.

     Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  Name 

Grant
Date

(1)

  

 

 

 

Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options

  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That

Have Not
Vested

(6)

  Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
have
Not
Vested
(2)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
rights
that Have
Not
Vested

(2)

 
 Exercisable  Unexercisable 

Mark P. Smith

  04/29/2016               2,925  $27,700       
  04/27/2017                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/27/2017               6,500  $61,555       
  04/26/2018                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/26/2018               9,750  $92,333       
  04/30/2019                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/30/2019               13,000  $123,110       
  04/06/2020                     89,742  $849,857 
  04/06/2020               44,872  $424,938       

Brian D. Murphy

  12/19/2016               5,731  $54,273       
  04/27/2017                     9,800  $92,806 
  04/27/2017               2,200  $20,834       
  04/26/2018                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/26/2018               9,750  $92,333       
  04/30/2019                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/30/2019               13,000  $123,110       
  04/06/2020                     89,742  $849,857 
  04/06/2020               44,872  $424,938       

P. James Debney

  04/10/2013   66,667(4)     $8.89   07/31/2020             
  04/10/2013   94,000 (5)     $8.89   07/31/2020             

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  04/29/2016               5,125  $48,534       
  04/27/2017                     50,200  $475,394 
  04/27/2017               11,450  $108,432       
  04/26/2018                     50,200  $475,394 
  04/26/2018               17,175  $162,647       
  04/30/2019                     50,200  $475,394 
  04/30/2019               22,900  $216,863       

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

Equity
Incentive

 

 

 

Equity
Incentive

 

 

 

Number

 

 

 

Value of

 

Plan Awards:

 

 

 

Plan Awards:

 

 

 

of

 

 

 

Shares or

 

Number of

 

 

 

Market or

 

 

 

Shares or

 

 

 

Units of

 

Unearned

 

 

 

Payout Value

 

 

 

Units of

 

 

 

Stock

 

Shares, Units

 

 

 

of Unearned

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

 

 

That Have

 

or Other

 

 

 

Shares, Units or

 

Award

 

That Have

 

 

 

Not

 

Rights That

 

 

 

Other Rights

 

Grant

 

Not

 

 

 

Vested

 

Have Not

 

 

 

That Have

Name

Date (1)

 

Vested

 

 

 

(2)

 

Vested (3)

 

 

 

Not Vested (2)

Mark P. Smith

4/30/2019

 

 

3,250

 

 

 

 

$

39,065

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/6/2020

 

 

22,436

 

 

 

 

$

269,681

 

 

 

 

89,742

 

(4)

 

 

$

1,078,699

 

 

8/25/2020

 

 

14,476

 

 

 

 

$

174,002

 

 

 

 

57,902

 

(4)

 

 

$

695,982

 

 

5/3/2021

 

 

20,889

 

 

 

 

$

251,086

 

 

 

 

83,556

 

 

 

 

$

1,004,343

 

 

 

5/2/2022

 

 

41,834

 

 

 

 

$

502,845

 

 

 

 

125,500

 

 

 

 

$

1,508,510

 

 

Deana L. McPherson

6/15/2019

 

 

1,146

 

 

 

 

$

13,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/6/2020

 

 

8,012

 

 

 

 

$

96,304

 

 

 

 

32,050

 

(4)

 

 

$

385,241

 

 

 

5/3/2021

 

 

6,427

 

 

 

 

$

77,253

 

 

 

 

25,708

 

 

 

 

$

309,010

 

 

 

5/2/2022

 

 

12,894

 

 

 

 

$

154,986

 

 

 

 

38,680

 

 

 

 

$

464,934

 

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

11/8/2021

 

 

12,180

 

 

 

 

$

146,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/2/2022

 

 

8,883

 

 

 

 

$

106,774

 

 

 

 

26,646

 

 

 

 

$

320,285

 

 

Susan J. Cupero

6/15/2019

 

 

576

 

 

 

 

$

6,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/15/2020

 

 

1,562

 

 

 

 

$

18,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/24/2020

 

 

475

 

 

 

 

$

5,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/9/2020

 

 

3,678

 

 

 

 

$

44,210

 

 

 

 

14,714

 

(4)

 

 

$

176,862

 

 

5/3/2021

 

 

4,419

 

 

 

 

$

53,116

 

 

 

 

17,674

 

 

 

 

$

212,441

 

 

5/2/2022

 

 

8,883

 

 

 

 

$

106,774

 

 

 

 

26,646

 

 

 

 

$

320,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        47


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

     Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  Name 

Grant
Date

(1)

  

 

 

 

Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options

  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That

Have Not
Vested

(6)

  Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
have
Not
Vested
(2)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
rights
that Have
Not
Vested

(2)

 
 Exercisable  Unexercisable 

Robert J. Cicero

  04/29/2016               2,925  $27,700       
  04/27/2017                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/27/2017               6,500  $61,555       
  04/26/2018                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/26/2018               9,750  $92,333       
  04/30/2019                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/30/2019               13,000  $123,110       
  03/06/2020               8,000  $75,760       
  04/06/2020                     32,050  $303,514 
  04/06/2020               16,026  $151,766       

Lane A. Tobiassen

  08/26/2016               4,375  $41,431       
  04/27/2017                     9,800  $92,806 
  04/27/2017               2,200  $20,834       
  04/26/2018                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/26/2018               9,750  $92,333       
  04/30/2019                     28,800  $272,736 
  04/30/2019               13,000  $123,110       

(1)

Generally, outstanding awards of stock options vest one-third on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Awards of RSUs vest one-fourth on May 1 following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. Awards of PSUs vest if the relative performance of our common stock achieves the then-applicable metric compared with the performance of the RUT over the approximately three-year performance period following the date of grant. For further information on these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis(1) Generally, awards of RSUs vest one-fourth on May 1 following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant or on each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of the grant. Awards of PSUs vest if the relative performance of our common stock achieves the then-applicable metric compared with the performance of the RUT over the approximately three-year performance period following the date of grant. For further information on these awards, see “Compensation Matters Fiscal 2019 Compensation — Stock-Based Compensation.”

(2)

The market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested and unearned equity incentive plan awards is determined by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock at the end of our last completed fiscal year by the number of shares or units of stock or the amount of unearned equity incentive plan awards, as applicable.

(3)

These PSUs vest based on the relative performance of our common stock against the RUT over the approximately three-year performance period following the date of grant and are reported at the maximum level of award. Notwithstanding the maximum amounts shown in this column, the maximum number of shares that can be delivered with respect to such grants is limited to a dollar value, determined as of the vesting date, of 600% of the grant date value. Reference is also made to footnote 1 above. See also “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2020 Compensation — Stock-Based Compensation.”

(4)

One-third of the stock options vested and became exercisable on each of the date of grant, September 26, 2013, and September 26, 2014. Under the terms of our separation with Mr. Debney, the exercise period for these options was extended from the original 30 days post-termination to the earlier of the Separation or July 31, 2020.

48    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

(5)

One-third of the stock options vested and became exercisable on each of the date of grant, April 24, 2014, and April 24, 2015. Under the terms of our separation with Mr. Debney, the exercise period for these options was extended from the original 30 days post-termination to the earlier of the Separation or July 31, 2020.

(6)

One-fourth of the RSUs vest on May 1 following each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, and the underlying shares of common stock are deliverable on each anniversary of the applicable vesting date.

See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — IntroductionCompensation ElementsHighlightsStock-Based Compensation.”

(2) The market value of Fiscal 2020 Compensation”shares or units of stock that have not vested and unearned equity incentive plan awards is determined by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock at the end of our last completed fiscal year by the number of shares or units of stock or the amount of unearned equity incentive plan awards, as applicable.

(3) These PSUs vest based on the relative performance of our common stock against the RUT over the approximately three-year performance period following the date of grant and are reported at the maximum level of award. Notwithstanding the maximum amounts shown in this column, the maximum number of shares that can be delivered with respect to such grants is limited to a dollar value, determined as of the vesting date, of 600% of the grant date value. Reference is also made to footnote 1 above. See also “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Elements — Stock-Based Compensation.”

(4) These PSUs were granted prior to the Separation; therefore, the performance against the RUT has been modified to compare against our market capitalization at the start of the performance period as compared to our market capitalization combined with AOUT at the end of the performance period. See “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Elements — Stock-Based Compensation — Adjustments for certain changes affecting fiscal 2020 compensation for our named executive officers.the Separation.”

33 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 20202023

The following table describes, for the named executive officers,NEOs, the number of shares acquired and the value realized on the exercise of options and vesting of stock awards during fiscal 2023.

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Number
of Shares

 

 

Value

 

Name

Acquired on
Vesting (1)

 

 

Realized on
Vesting (2)

 

Mark P. Smith

 

60,719

 

 

$

847,553

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

8,442

 

 

$

119,307

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

4,061

 

 

$

46,905

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

6,628

 

 

$

85,877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes shares that have vested but are not yet deliverable.

(2) For stock awards, the fiscal year endedvalue realized is computed as the market price on the later of the date the restrictions lapse or the delivery date multiplied by the number of shares vested. See “Compensation Matters — Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Compensation Elements — Stock-Based Compensation — 2020 PSU Payout.”

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information with respect to our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options or delivery of shares related to RSUs under our equity compensation plans as of April 30, 2020.2023.

 Name

  Option Awards   Stock Awards 
  

Number of
Shares
Acquired

on

Exercise

   Value
Realized on
Exercise
   Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting (1)
   Value
Realized
on
Vesting
(2)
 

Mark P. Smith

      $    13,175   $129,510 

Brian D. Murphy

      $    10,081   $95,830 

P. James Debney

      $    58,225   $572,352 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

      $    23,075   $226,827 

Robert J. Cicero

      $    13,175   $129,510 

Lane A. Tobiassen

      $    8,725   $75,573 

Plan Category

 

(a) Number
of Securities
to be Issued
Upon
Delivery of
Shares for
Restricted
Stock Units

 

 

(b) Number
of Securities
to be Issued
Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options

 

 

(c) Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants,
and Rights (1)

 

 

(d) Number
of Securities
Remaining
Available
for Future
Issuance
Under
Equity
Compensation
Plans
(Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column
(a))(2)

 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders

 

 

901,959

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

7,609,402

 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

901,959

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

7,609,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes shares that have vested but are not yet deliverable until the first anniversary of the vesting date.

(2)

For stock awards, the value realized is computed as the market price on the later of the date the restrictions lapse or the delivery date multiplied by the number of shares vested. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Certain Stock-Based Compensation Arrangements in Prior Fiscal Years — Vesting of Previous PSU Grants.”

Retirement Plans

(1) The weighted average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding RSUs, which have no exercise price.

(2) Under our 2022 Incentive Stock Plan, an aggregate of 4,786,085 shares of our common stock was authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under such plan, of which 1,000,000 were authorized under the 2022 plan and 3,786,085 were carried over from the 2013 plan. The number of available shares will be increased by the number of shares with respect to which awards previously granted under such plan are terminated without being exercised, expire, are forfeited or cancelled, do not vest, or are surrendered in payment of any awards or any tax withholding with respect thereto. As of April 30, 2023, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2022 Incentive Stock Plan was 4,784,449. Our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan authorizes the sale of up to 3,000,000 shares of our common stock to employees. As of April 30, 2023, there were 2,824,953 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

RETIREMENT PLANS

We maintain our Profit Sharing and Investment Plan or 401(k) Plan,(the “401(k) Plan”), a retirement plan intended to be tax-qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and under which 401(k), Roth, matching, and discretionary profit-sharing contributions are authorized. All profit-sharing contributions vest immediately and all matching contributions vest 50% after one year and 100% after two years. The plan covers substantially all of our employees, including our executive officers,NEOs, subject to meeting applicable eligibility requirements.

34 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

Employees become eligible to make 401(k) and Roth contributions and to receive matching contributions on the first day of the month after their date of hire. Subject to certain Code limitations, the plan permits non-highly compensated employees to make 401(k) and Roth contributions of up to 100% of their eligible compensation and for the plan year ended April 30, 2020, highly compensated employees were permitted to make 401(k) and Roth contributions of up to 9% of their eligible compensation. Subject to certain Code limitations, we make discretionary matching contributions with

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        49


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

respect to our employees’ 401(k) and Roth contributions. For the plan years ended April 30, 2020, 2019,2023, 2022, and 2018,2021, we made matching contributions equal to 50% of participants’ 401(k) and Roth contributions, up to 6% of their eligible compensation.

Employees become eligible to receive profit sharing contributions on the first day of the plan year subsequent to when they complete one year of eligible service and must be employed on the last day of the plan year, in order to receive a profit-sharing contribution, if any, for that plan year. For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020,2023, we made profit sharing contributions equal to approximately 5.5%15.0% of the operatingincome from operations, excluding profit of our company, excluding the impact of the goodwill impairment. Operating profitsharing (as defined under the plan is defined as income before interest and state and federal income taxes.plan). Profit sharing contributions are allocated to eligible participants in proportion to their eligible compensation (subject to certain Code limitations).

Pension Benefits

We do not offer any defined benefit pension plan to any of our executive officers.

Nonqualified Deferred CompensationNONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

OurWe offer a Nonqualified Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan, was adopted by our Board of Directors in December 2013, to be effective as of March 1, 2014. The planwhich is an unfunded deferred compensation plan that is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder.thereunder (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). The planDeferred Compensation Plan provides deferred compensation benefits to a select group of management or highly compensated employees, as selected (in each case) by our company and participating affiliates.us.

The planDeferred Compensation Plan allows participants to prospectively elect to defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of certain cash bonuses. In the event that salary deferred into the 401(k) Plan must be returned to a participant under the Code’s 401(k) rules, a comparable amount of salary may be deferred into the plan by the participant if the participant has made such an election. In addition, our company and participating affiliates willwe make non-elective contributions to the extent necessary to compensate participants for the amount of their “profit sharing” contribution that cannot be made to the 401(k) Plan due to the limitations of Section 415 of the Code. Additional discretionary non-elective contributions may also be made. Participant deferrals and non-elective contributions are, at all times, 100% vested.

A participant’s deferralsDeferrals and non-elective contributions are credited to a deferred compensation account and held in a “rabbi trust” until the occurrence of an applicable distributable event. All of the assets of the rabbi trust will be subject to the claims of creditors of our company and participating affiliates, as applicable. The distributable events include the following:

·

separation from service with our company and its affiliates;

·

death;

·

disability;

·

specified time designated by the participant in his or her deferral agreement;

·

a change in control of our company; and

·

unforeseeable emergencies.

Distributable amounts are paid in the form of a lump sum cash payment or, for certain distributions, in a fixed number of cash installment payments, as elected by the participant.

50    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

A menu of investment options is made available to participants, and each participant will be able to select from such investment options, which will be used to determine the earnings, gains, and losses to be credited to the deferred amounts. We are not required to invest a participant’s account in the investment options selected because they are used only for purposes of determining the earnings, losses, and gains to be credited to a participant’s account. We retain the discretion to amend or terminate the plan at any time (provided no such action affects a participant’s right to receive the full amount of his or her account balance).

No contributions were made by our named executive officers in fiscal 2020.

The following table sets forth, for the named executive officers,our NEOs, earnings, distributions and year-end account balances with respect to the Nonqualified Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan.

  Name  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
  Aggregated
Withdrawals /
Distributions
in Last FY
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE (1)
 

Mark P. Smith

  $       $(1,042     $19,345 

Brian D. Murphy

  $       $      $ 

P. James Debney

  $       $(705     $24,656 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  $       $8      $4,234 

Robert J. Cicero

  $       $248      $11,922 

Lane A. Tobiassen

  $       $      $ 

Name

 

Aggregate Balance at Beginning FY

 

 

Registrant Contributions in Last FY

 

 

Employee Contributions in Last FY

 

 

Aggregate Earnings in last FY

 

 

Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions

 

 

Aggregate Balance at Last FYE (1)

 

Mark P. Smith

 

$

38,252

 

 

$

13,950

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,176

 

 

$

 

 

$

53,377

 

Deana L. McPherson

 

$

321,064

 

 

$

11,427

 

 

$

38,934

 

 

$

8,869

 

 

$

 

 

$

380,294

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

$

3,646

 

 

$

3,017

 

 

$

 

 

$

75

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,738

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Earnings reported in the aggregate balance at last fiscal year end were not reported as compensation to the NEO in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years because no above-market or preferential earnings on any nonqualified deferred compensation were paid to our NEOs.

(1)

Earnings reported in the aggregate balance at last fiscal year end were not reported as compensation to the named executive officer in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years because no above-market or preferential earnings on any nonqualified deferred compensation were paid to our named executive officers.

Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements with Our Named Executive Officers

Employment Agreements with Mr. Smith and Mr. Murphy

On April 4, 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with each of Messrs. Smith and Murphy, as Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers, effective as of January 15, 2020. On August 24, 2020, the effective date of the spin-off of our outdoor products and accessories business to American Outdoor Brands, Inc., Mr. Smith became the sole President and Chief Executive Officer of our company, and Mr. Murphy resigned all positions with our company and our subsidiaries and became the President and Chief Executive Officer of American Outdoor Brands, Inc. Our employment agreement with Mr. Murphy was deemed to have been assigned to American Outdoor Brands, Inc., effective on August 24, 2020.

Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Smith is entitled to an annual base salary of $500,000 (subject to annual review by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof). Mr. Smith is also eligible to participate in our executive compensation programs, to receive a discretionary annual cash bonus under our annual cash incentive program as determined by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof, and to receive annual and periodic stock-based compensation awards as determined by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof. Mr. Smith is entitled to receive other standard benefits, including a car allowance of $1,500 per month; participation in any group health insurance, pension, retirement, vacation, expense reimbursement, relocation program (as applicable), and other plans, programs, and benefits approved by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof

LOGO2020

35 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    51

img125871598_6.jpg 



  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Executive Compensation

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

and made available from time to time to our other executive employees; and certain insurance benefits (including the reimbursement

Name

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon Separation

 

Termination Not for
Cause, or for
Good Reason - No
Change of Control

 

 

Termination Not for Cause,
or Upon Resignation -
Change of Control

 

 

Voluntary
Termination

 

 

Death

 

 

Disability

 

Mark P. Smith

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

$

1,081,500

 

(1)

$

2,054,843

 

(2)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Bonus (3)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Equity Awards

 

$

1,236,678

 

(4)

$

1,236,678

 

(5)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health and welfare benefits (6)

 

$

43,025

 

 

$

43,025

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Other (7)

 

$

27,000

 

 

$

27,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deana McPherson

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

$

206,000

 

(8)

$

671,558

 

(9)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Bonus (3)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Equity Awards

 

$

 

 

$

342,318

 

(5)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health and welfare benefits (6)

 

$

10,104

 

 

$

20,208

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Other

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

$

175,000

 

(8)

$

447,662

 

(9)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Bonus (3)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Equity Awards

 

$

 

 

$

253,177

 

(5)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health and welfare benefits (6)

 

$

14,014

 

 

$

28,027

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Other

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Susan J. Cupero

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

$

154,500

 

(8)

$

489,764

 

(9)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Bonus (3)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Equity Awards

 

$

 

 

$

235,508

 

(5)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health and welfare benefits (6)

 

$

10,316

 

 

$

20,632

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

Other

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)
Includes continuation of reasonable insurance premiums for a key person term-insurance policy). If we unilaterally terminate Mr. Smith’s employment without cause, he will receive (i) hisbase salary paid out over 18 months.
(2)
Includes continuation of base salary for a period of 18 months after such termination; (ii) a pro rata portion of his annual cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs to the extent earned under the then applicable executive annual cash incentive program; (iii) at our option, either (x) coverage under our medical plan to the extent provided for him pursuant to his employment agreement at the termination, such benefits to be received for a period of 18 months after the termination, or (y) reimbursement for the COBRA premium for such coverage through the earlier of such 18-month period or the COBRA eligibility period; and (iv) a vested pro rata portion of stock-based awards scheduled to vest in the fiscal year of the termination.

If Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by reason of his death or disability, if Mr. Smith unilaterally terminates his employment, or if Mr. Smith engages in an act or acts involving a crime, moral turpitude, fraud, or dishonesty, or Mr. Smith willfully violates in a material respect our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, or Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, Mr. Smith shall receive no further base compensation under his employment agreement.

If Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by reason of his death or disability, if we unilaterally terminate Mr. Smith’s employment without cause, or if Mr. Smith voluntarily terminates his employment, or is terminated by the company, following a qualifying change in control event as described below, the employment agreement for Mr. Smith provides that he will receive, for the fiscal year of the notice of termination, any earned bonus, on a pro-rated basis, based on the performance goals actually achieved for the fiscal year of the notice of termination, as determined in the sole discretion of our Board of Directors or a committee thereof, at the time such bonuses are paid to our other employees.

Mr. Smith’s employment agreement provides that, in the event of a change in control of our company (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Smith may, at his option and upon written notice to us, terminate his employment, unless (i) the provisions of his employment agreement remains in full force and effect and (ii) he suffers no reduction in his status, duties, authority, or compensation following the change in control, provided that he will be considered to suffer a reduction in his status, duties, or authority if, after the change in control, (a) he is not the chief executive officer of the company that succeeds to our business; (b) such company’s stock is not listed on a national stock exchange; or (c) such company terminates his employment or reduces his status, duties, authority, or compensation within one year of the change in control. If, within one year of a change of control, Mr. Smith terminates his employment due to the change in control following which the employment agreement does not remain in full force and effect or his status, duties, authority, or compensation have been reduced, or such company terminates Mr. Smith, he will receive (A) his base salary for a period of 18 months after such termination; (B) an amount equal to 150% of the average of his cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding his termination, which will be paid over the 18-month period after such termination; (C) his car allowance for a periodtermination.

(3)
Includes an amount equal to 18 months after such termination; and (D) at our option, either (x) coverage under our medical plan100% of the pro-rata share of his or her cash bonus earned in the year of termination.
(4)
Equal to the extent provided for him atpro-rata portion of stock-based compensation that would have vested in the dateyear of termination for a period equal to 18 months after such termination or (y) reimbursementtermination.
(5)
Includes the accelerated vesting of RSUs granted in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 and PSUs granted in 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, where applicable, calculated on actual performance through April 30, 2023. Based on the actual performance through April 30, 2023, we estimated that no PSU shares would accelerate for the COBRA premium for such coverage through the earlierawards granted in Fiscal 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023.
(6)
Includes reimbursement of such 18-month period or the COBRA eligibility period. In addition, all unvested stock-based compensation held by Mr. Smith in his capacity as an employee on the effective date of the termination will vest as of the effective date of such termination.

52    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

The employment agreement prohibits Mr. Smith from competing with us for a period equal to 18 months following the termination of his employment with us, regardless of the reason therefor, in any state or other geographical area in which we sell products or provide services during his employment with us. The employment agreement also prohibits Mr. Smith from soliciting, seeking to hire, or hiring any person or persons who is employed by or was employed by us within 12 months of the termination of his employment for a period equal to 18 months following the termination of his employment with us.

Severance Agreement with Mr. Debney

We and Mr. Debney were parties to an amended and restated employment agreement, which is referred to as the Employment Agreement

The Employment Agreement provided that if we terminated Mr. Debney’s employment without Good Cause, or Mr. Debney terminated his employment for Good Reason (each as defined in the Employment Agreement), he would receive certain payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Employment Agreement. These payments and benefits include continuation of base salary, periodic payments equal in the aggregate to the average of the cash incentive bonuses paid to him for each of the preceding two fiscal years, payment of a pro rata portion of his cash incentive bonus to the extent earned under the then applicable executive annual cash incentive program, reimbursement for the cost of healthcare continuation coverage for him and his eligible dependents, continued payment of his car allowance, a stipend for secretarial coverage, continued payment of life insurance premiums, and the ability to exercise his vested options for up to nine months following termination.

On February 26, 2020, we and Mr. Debney entered into a certain Separation Agreement and Release, or the Severance Agreement, which was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2020, in connection with Mr. Debney’s separation from our company as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of our company. We previously reported Mr. Debney’s separation in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 16, 2020.

Pursuant to the Severance Agreement, we have paid or we will pay Mr. Debney severance pay and other benefits as follows: (i) the amount of $83,333 per month for a period of 12 months after the Termination Date (as defined in the Severance Agreement); (ii) reimbursement for Mr. Debney’s cost to maintain coverage under our group medical plans, pursuant to COBRA for a period of 12 months after the Termination Date; (iii) premiums required to maintain Mr. Debney’s company-provided life insurance26 or 52 weeks, as of the Termination Date, which life insurance has a death benefit in the amount of $5.0 million for a period of 12 months after the Termination Date, or, in the alternative, if such life insurance cannot be maintained to reimburse Mr. Debneyapplicable, for the amount of premiums that would otherwise be payable to the insurer so that Mr. Debney can either convert the life insurance coverage to an individual policy or buy other life insurance; (iv) a lump sum payment of $5,000 to reimburse Mr. Debney for the costs of moving expenses to move his personal property out of our offices; (v) extension of the exercise date for Mr. Debney to exercise his options to purchase 160,667 shares of our common stock at the price of $8.89 per share under our 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to the earlier of July 31, 2020 or the day prior to the effective date of the spin-off of outdoor products and accessories business to American Outdoor Brands, Inc.; and (vi) vest Mr. Debney as of the Termination Date in 44,731 of his currently unvested RSUs, subject to the delivery procedures applicable to Mr. Debney’s currently vested RSUs, except there will be no one-year hold requirement, provided that all other unvested RSUs shall be terminated and of no effect. In addition, the Severance Agreement includes

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        53


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

mutual releases between our company and Mr. Debney, as well as non-disparagement and confidentiality requirements binding upon Mr. Debney.

Mr. Debney’s separation, which occurred during our third fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2020, resulted in a reduction in general and administrative expenses for that quarter by approximately $3.8 million. The Severance Agreement, which was executed following the end of our third quarter, resulted in an increase in general and administrative expenses of approximately $1.6 million, most of which was recognized during our fourth fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2020. Therefore, the impact in fiscal 2020 as a result of Mr. Debney’s separation and our entry into the Severance Agreement resulted in a net reduction in general and administrative expenses of approximately $2.2 million.

Retirement Agreement with Mr. Buchanan

We and Mr. Buchanan were parties to a severance and change in control agreement, which is referred to as the Severance Agreement. Pursuant to his Severance Agreement, if we terminated Mr. Buchanan’s employment without Good Cause, or Mr. Buchanan terminated his employment for Good Reason (each as defined in the Severance Agreement), Mr. Buchanan would receive certain payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Severance Agreement. These payments and benefits include continuation of base salary and payment of a pro rata portion of his cash incentive bonus to the extent earned under the then-applicable executive annual cash incentive program. These payments and benefits are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

On August 5, 2020, in recognition of the long and valuable services provided by Mr. Buchanan to our company, we and Mr. Buchanan entered into an agreement, which we refer to as the Retirement Agreement, in connection with Mr. Buchanan’s retirement from our company, effective as of the close of business on August 23, 2020 or such other earlier date as may be accepted by the Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, Mr. Buchanan retired as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, and Treasurer and from all other positions with our company and our subsidiaries and affiliates, as we previously reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2020.

Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement and in connection with Mr. Buchanan’s retirement, (i) the restricted stock units held by Mr. Buchanan were accelerated; (ii) the performance stock units held by Mr. Buchanan were accelerated at target and were converted into 50,200 shares of our common stock; (iii) the holding period on the shares underlying or associated with the accelerated restricted stock units or performance stock units were waived, provided that Mr. Buchanan may not sell any such shares prior to October 1, 2020 when he completes the transition of his duties; (iv) Mr. Buchanan will remain on the payroll of our company until September 30, 2020 to complete the transition of his duties; (v) the period of non-competition set forth in Section 4(b) of the Severance Agreement was extended from 12 months to 24 months; and (vi) Mr. Buchanan will not receive any cash payments, whether provided for in Sections 2 and 3 of the Severance Agreement, or otherwise, and Sections 2 and 3 of the Severance Agreement will no longer have any force or effect.

Separation Agreement with Mr. Tobiassen

We and Mr. Tobiassen were parties to an employment change letter, which is referred to as the Offer Letter. As described in the Offer Letter, on March 7, 2019, Mr. Tobiassen became President of the Firearm Division of our company, becoming eligible to participate in the Executive Severance Plan of our company (as described below). At that time, our company agreed to honor and continue the benefits for which Mr. Tobiassen had been eligible under his prior employment arrangement, which

54    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ��

our company assumed in the acquisition of Crimson Trace Corporation, an Oregon corporation. In the event Mr. Tobiassen terminated his employment for Good Reason, or his employment was terminated without Good Cause (each as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), Mr. Tobiassen would receive (i) salary continuation for 52 weeks, plus $50,000, and (ii) reimbursement for the cost of healthcare continuation coverage for 52 weeks. Pursuant to the Offer Letter and in connection with Mr. Tobiassen’s separation from our company, (i) Mr. Tobiassen’s salary will continue for 52 weeks, plus $50,000; (ii) Mr. Tobiassen will be reimbursed for the cost of healthcare continuation coverage for 52 weeks; and (iii) we accelerated a total of 4,375 RSUs by Mr. Tobiassen. Mr. Tobiassen separated from our company effective August 1, 2020.

Other Severance Arrangements

Participants in the Executive Severance Plan

We have adopted the Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. Executive Severance Pay Plan, which is referred to as the Executive Severance Plan, for the benefit of (i) any person appointed by our Board of Directors as an Executive Officer of our company, who is not covered by a separate employment agreement, severance agreement, change in control agreement, or similar agreement covering such Executive Officer’s severance, or (ii) any other officer of our company or of an Applicable Subsidiary (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan) that is selected by the plan administrator (currently, the Compensation Committee) in its sole and absolute discretion. Severance eligibility for Messrs. Smith, Buchanan, and Debney is or was covered under other agreements and therefore they are not covered under the Executive Severance Plan. Mr. Smith is the only current named executive officer that is covered under his employment agreement. Messrs. Debney (the former President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company) and Buchanan (the former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, and Treasurer of our company) are covered under their Severance Agreement and Retirement Agreement, respectively. Messrs. Cicero and Tobiassen were the only named executive officers who participated in the Executive Severance Plan during fiscal 2020, but the plan also covers any other person that meets the eligibility requirements.

Pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan, if we terminate a participating executive without Good Cause (other than due to death or disability) or a participating executive resigns for Good Reason (each as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), he or she will receive certain payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Executive Severance Plan. These payments and benefits include continuation of base salary, payment of a pro rata portion of his or her cash incentive bonus, and reimbursement for the cost of healthcare continuation coverage for the participating executive and his or her eligible dependents. These payments and benefits are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

In addition, if we terminate

(7)
Includes a participating executive during a Potential Change in Control Protection Period or Change in Control Protection Period or a participating executive resigns following an Adverse Change in Control Effect (each as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), he or she will receive certain payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Executive Severance Plan. These payments and benefits include$1,500 per month car allowance for 18 months.
(8)
Includes continuation of base salary a lump sum cash paymentpaid out over six months.
(9)
Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 12 months and an amount equal to the average of the cash incentive bonusesbonus paid to the executive for each of the preceding two fiscal years vesting of all stock-based compensation granted to the executive in his or her capacity as an employee of our company, and reimbursement for the cost of healthcare continuation coverage for the participating executive and his or her eligible dependents. These payments and benefits are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”immediately preceding termination.

LOGO2020

36 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    55

img125871598_6.jpg 



  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Executive Compensation

Our obligations under the Executive Severance Plan are contingent upon (i) the participating executive executing (and not revoking during any applicable revocation period) and not violating any provision of a valid and enforceable full and unconditional release of all claims against us or any of our affiliates, and (ii) the participating executive’s full compliance with any and all non-competition, non-solicitation, and similar agreements by which the participating executive was bound as of the effective date of his or her termination or resignation.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Termination by Us Without Good Cause or by the Executive with Good Reason — No Change in Control

Mr. Smith

Pursuant to his Employment Agreement, if we unilaterally terminate Mr. Smith’s employment without cause, other than in connection with a Change in Control, death, or disability, he will receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Employment Agreement:

·

Cash Severance. For a period of 18 months after such termination, the sum of his base salary.

·

Pro-rated Cash Bonus. A pro-rated cash bonus for the fiscal year in which notice of termination is given, based on the performance goals actually achieved for such fiscal year as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion, and paid at the time such bonuses are paid to our other executives.

·

Pro-rata Vesting of RSUs. A pro-rata vesting for the current tranche of outstanding RSUs.

·

Healthcare Coverage. At our option, either (x) payment of premiums for healthcare coverage for a period equal to 18 months, to the extent of his participation in such coverage at the date of termination, or (y) reimbursement for COBRA premiums for such coverage through the earlier of 18 months or the COBRA eligibility period.

·

Car Allowance. For a period of 18 months after such termination, his $1,500 per month car allowance.

Mr. Buchanan

Pursuant to his Severance Agreement, if we terminated Mr. Buchanan’s employment without Good Cause, other than in connection with a Change in Control, or Mr. Buchanan terminated his employment for Good Reason, Mr. Buchanan would receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Severance Agreement:CEO PAY RATIO

·

Cash Severance. His base salary for a period of 12 months after such termination.

Fiscal Year

 

Identification of
Median
Salary
($)

 

 

Median
Employee
Compensation
($)

 

 

CEO
Compensation
($)

 

Ratio

 

2023

 

 

49,136

 

 

 

52,740

 

 

2,305,721 (1)

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Pro-rated Cash Bonus. A portion of the cash bonus deemed by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion to be earned. The bonus will be pro-rated for the period commencing on the first day of the fiscal year for which the cash bonus is calculated and ending on the effective date of termination and will be paid at the time such bonuses are paid to our other executives.

Mr. Cicero and other Participants

(1)
As reported in the Executive Severance Plan

Pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan, if we terminate the employmentSummary Compensation Table of Mr. Cicero or other participating executives without Good Cause, other than in connection with a Change in Control, death, or disability, or any of them terminates their employment, respectively, for Good Reason, each

56    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement
this Proxy Statement.


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

executive will receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Executive Severance Plan:

·

Cash Severance. Such executive’s base salary for a period of 26 weeks.

·

Pro-rated Cash Bonus. A portion of the cash bonus earned in accordance with the applicable bonus plan. The bonus will be pro-rated for the period commencing on the first day of the fiscal year for which the cash bonus is calculated and ending on the effective date of termination and will be paid at the time such bonuses are paid to our other executives.

·

Healthcare Coverage. In the event the executive elects such coverage, reimbursement for the cost of continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA for a period of 26 weeks for the executive and his eligible dependents.

Termination or Resignation in Connection with a Change in Control

Mr. Smith

If, within one year of a Change in Control, Mr. Smith terminates his employment due to the Change in Control following which his Employment Agreement does not remain in full force and effect or his status, duties, authority, or compensation have been reduced, or such company terminates Mr. Smith, he will receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Employment Agreement:

·

Cash Severance. His base salary for a period of 18 months after such termination, and an amount equal to 150% of the average of his cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding his termination, such amount to be paid and received for a period of 18 months after such termination.

·

Car Allowance. His $1,500 per month car allowance for a period of 18 months after such termination.

·

Healthcare Coverage. At our option, either (x) payment of premiums for healthcare coverage for a period equal to 18 months, to the extent of his participation in such coverage at the date of termination, or (y) reimbursement for COBRA premiums for such coverage through the earlier of 18 months or the COBRA eligibility period.

·

Stock-Based Awards. All unvested stock-based compensation held by Mr. Smith in his capacity as an employee on the effective date of the termination and subject to acceleration under the provisions of his Employment Agreement will vest as of the effective date of such termination.

All payments are subject to Mr. Smith signing a release of claims, in a form acceptable to the company.

Mr. Cicero and other Participants in the Executive Severance Plan

Pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan, if (i) we terminate the employment of Mr. Cicero or other participating executives during a Potential Change in Control Protection Period or Change in Control Protection Period or (ii) any of them resign following an Adverse Change in Control Effect, such

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        57


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

executive will receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Executive Severance Plan:

·

Cash Severance. The executive’s base salary for a period of 52 weeks, and an amount equal to the average of the executive’s cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding his or her termination.

·

Stock-Based Compensation. All unvested stock-based compensation held by the executive at the time of the termination or resignation that was granted to the executive in his or her capacity as an employee will vest as of the effective date of such termination.

·

Healthcare Coverage. In the event the executive elects such coverage, reimbursement for the cost of continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA for a period of 52 weeks for the executive and his or her eligible dependents.

In addition, certain stock-based compensation held by the executive that is not subject to the provisions of the Executive Severance Plan will vest on a qualifying termination of employment following a Change in Control, as defined in the applicable award agreement.

Termination for Good Cause or Resignation Without Good Reason

Mr. Smith

Other than as provided to our salaried employees generally, including amounts accrued but unpaid at the time of termination, if Mr. Smith unilaterally terminates his employment, or if Mr. Smith engages in an act or acts involving a crime, moral turpitude, fraud, or dishonesty, or Mr. Smith willfully violates in a material respect our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, or Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, Mr. Smith shall receive no further base compensation under his Employment Agreement.

Mr. Cicero and other Participants in the Executive Severance Plan

Other than as provided to our salaried employees generally, including amounts accrued but unpaid at the time of termination, neither of Mr. Cicero or any other participating executive is eligible to receive any additional payments or benefits if his or her employment is terminated by us for Good Cause or by him or her without Good Reason.

Termination by Reason of Death

Mr. Smith

In addition to those payments and benefits provided to our salaried employees generally, including amounts accrued but unpaid at the time of termination and through life insurance, if Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by reason of his Death (as defined in his Employment Agreement), he will receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Employment Agreement:

·

Pro-rated Cash Bonus. A pro-rated cash bonus for the fiscal year in which termination by reason of death occurs, based on the performance goals actually achieved for such fiscal year as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion, and paid at the time such bonuses are paid to our other executives.

Mr. Cicero and other Participants in the Executive Severance Plan

Other than as provided to our salaried employees generally, including amounts accrued but unpaid at the time of termination and through life insurance, neither of Mr. Cicero or any other participating executive is eligible to receive any payments or benefits if his or her employment is terminated by reason of his or her death.

58    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Termination by Reason of Disability

Mr. Smith

In addition to those payments and benefits provided to our salaried employees generally, including amounts accrued but unpaid at the time of termination and through disability insurance, if Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by reason of his Disability (as defined in his Employment Agreement), he will receive the following payments or benefits, subject to the terms and conditions set out in his Employment Agreement:

·

Pro-rated Cash Bonus. A pro-rated cash bonus for the fiscal year in which notice of termination is given, based on the performance goals actually achieved for such fiscal year as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion, and paid at the time such bonuses are paid to our other executives.

Mr. Cicero and other Participants in the Executive Severance Plan

Other than as provided to our salaried employees generally, including amounts accrued but unpaid at the time of termination and through disability insurance, neither of Mr. Cicero or any other participating executive is eligible to receive any payments or benefits if his or her employment is terminated by reason of his or her disability.

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control of our Company

Consistent with our double-trigger philosophy, the Compensation Committee has determined that PSU awards (including PSUs granted in fiscal 2018, 2019, and 2020) will contain provisions providing that the PSUs will convert into a number of RSUs based on the achievement of the original performance objectives as of the date of the Change in Control (as defined in the applicable award agreements) and those RSUs will remain unvested until the earlier of (i) a qualifying termination of employment or (ii) the original vesting date.

The following tables set forth certain information regarding potential payments and other benefits that would be payable to each of our named executive officers in various situations, including termination of employment or a Change in Control of our company. Although the calculations are intended to provide reasonable estimates of the potential benefits, they are based on numerous assumptions and may not represent the actual amount our executives would receive if a termination of employment or Change in Control were to occur. In addition to the amounts disclosed in the following section, each executive would retain the amounts which he has earned or accrued over the course of his employment prior to the termination event, and would receive any amounts accrued but unpaid

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        59


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

through the date of termination. The tables below set forth the estimated benefits each of our named executive officers would receive if the termination of employment or the Change in Control event occurred on April 30, 2020.

Mark P. Smith

  Executive Benefits 

Termination Not for

Cause, or

for Good Reason – No
Change of Control

  Termination Not for
Cause, or Upon
Resignation –
Change of Control
  Death  Disability 

Compensation:

    

Cash Severance (1)

 $750,000  $1,401,922(5)       

Bonus (2)

 $359,341  $  $359,341  $359,341 

Equity Awards

 $226,267(6)  $1,163,844(7)       

Benefits and Perquisites:

    

Health and Welfare Benefits (3)

 $38,826  $38,826       

Other Benefits (4)

 $27,000  $47,000       

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

  Executive Benefits  

Termination Not for
Cause, or

for Good Reason – No
Change of Control

  Termination Not for
Cause, or Upon
Resignation –
Change of Control
 

Compensation:

   

Cash Severance

  $423,602(8)  $1,128,522(9) 

Bonus (2)

  $288,338  $ 

Equity Awards

  $  $1,011,870(7) 

Benefits and Perquisites:

   

Health and Welfare Benefits

       

Other Benefits

       

Robert J. Cicero

  Executive Benefits  

Termination Not for
Cause, or

for Good Reason – No
Change of Control

  Termination Not for
Cause, or Upon
Resignation –
Change of Control
 

Compensation:

   

Cash Severance

  $178,707(10)  $718,007(11) 

Bonus (2)

  $210,847  $ 

Equity Awards

     $862,627(7) 

Benefits and Perquisites:

   

Health and Welfare Benefits (3)

  $12,942  $25,884 

Other Benefits

       

60    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Lane A. Tobiassen

  Executive Benefits  

Termination Not for
Cause, or

for Good Reason – No
Change of Control

  Termination Not for
Cause, or Upon
Resignation –
Change of Control
 

Compensation:

   

Cash Severance

  $365,087(12)  $507,890(13) 

Bonus (2)

  $201,351  $ 

Equity Awards

     $550,444(7) 

Benefits and Perquisites:

   

Health and Welfare Benefits (3)

  $25,884  $25,884 

Other Benefits

       

(1)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 18 months.

(2)

Each of our named executive officers received cash incentive compensation for company-wide or divisional financial performance as applicable as a result of our achieving the pre-established targets set out in our Fiscal 2020 Cash Incentive Compensation Program.

(3)

Includes reimbursement for the cost of continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA for a period of 26, 52 weeks, as applicable, for the executive and his eligible dependents.

(4)

Includes a $1,500 per month car allowance for 18 months.

(5)

Includes continuation of base salary for 18 months and an amount equal to 150% of the average of his cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding his termination.

(6)

Equal to the pro-rata portion of stock-based compensation that would have vested in the year of termination.

(7)

Includes the accelerated vesting of PSUs granted in 2018, 2019, and 2020 calculated on actual performance through April 30, 2020. Based on the actual performance through April 30, 2020, we estimated that no shares would accelerate for the 2018 awards. Because of the timing of the 2020 award, we estimated that the performance of our stock equaled the performance of the RUT, therefore, resulting in the minimum payout of 38% of the target award.

(8)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 12 months.

(9)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 18 months and an amount equal to the average of Mr. Buchanan’s cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding his termination ($493,119), paid out in a lump sum.

(10)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 6 months.

(11)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 12 months and an amount equal to the average of the cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding termination.

(12)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 12 months plus $50,000.

(13)

Includes continuation of base salary paid out over 12 months plus $50,000 and an amount equal to the average of the cash bonus paid for each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding termination.

2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Our 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended to provide our employees with an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in our company through the purchase of shares of our common stock through accumulated voluntary payroll deductions, thereby enhancing employee interest in our continued success. The plan was adopted by our Board of Directors, subject to approval by our stockholders, who approved the plan in September 2011. Our Board of Directors amended the plan in March 2012. There were 4,361,853 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        61


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

the plan as of April��30, 2020. The plan is currently administered by our Board of Directors. Under the plan’s terms, however, our Board of Directors may appoint a committee to administer the plan, which we refer to as the Plan Committee. The plan grants broad authority to our Board of Directors or the Plan Committee to administer and interpret the plan.

The plan permits eligible employees to authorize payroll deductions that will be utilized to purchase shares of our common stock during a series of consecutive 12-month offering periods, with two six-month purchase or exercise periods within the offering periods. Employees may purchase shares of common stock pursuant to the plan at a favorable price and possibly with favorable tax consequences. All employees of our company or of those subsidiaries, designated by our Board of Directors, who are regularly scheduled to work at least 20 hours per week for more than five months per calendar year, are eligible to participate in the plan. However, an employee will not be granted an option under the plan if immediately after the grant, such employee would own common stock, including outstanding options to purchase common stock under the plan, possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of our common stock, or participation in the plan would permit such employee’s rights to purchase our common stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans to exceed $25,000 in fair market value (determined at the time the option is granted) of our common stock for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding.

The plan will be implemented in a series of successive offering periods, each with a maximum duration of 12 months. If the fair market value per share of our common stock on any purchase date is less than the fair market value per share on the start date of a 12-month offering period, then that offering period will automatically terminate, and a new 12-month offering period will begin on the next business day. Each offering period will begin on the April 1 or October 1, as applicable, immediately following the end of the previous offering period. Due to the complexities of administering an ESSP purchase during the Separation, for the purchase period that would normally end on September 30, 2020, a decision was made to shorten the purchase window and purchase stock under the plan on August 3, 2020 in order to allow all employees enrolled in the plan, regardless of which business they were to employed by after the Separation to participate in the purchase. A new offering period will begin on October 1, 2020.

Upon enrollment in the plan, the participant authorizes a payroll deduction, on an after-tax basis, in an amount of not less than 1% and not more than 20% (or such greater percentage as the Plan Committee may establish from time to time before the first day of an offering period) of the participant’s eligible compensation on each payroll date. Unless the participant withdraws from the plan, the participant’s option for the purchase of shares will be exercised automatically on each exercise date, and the maximum number of full shares subject to the option will be purchased for the participant at the applicable exercise price with the accumulated plan contributions then credited to the participant’s account under the plan. To the extent necessary to comply with Section 423 of the Code, the Plan Committee may reduce a participant’s payroll deduction percentage to 0% at such time during any purchase period scheduled to end during the current calendar year when the participant’s aggregate payroll deductions for the calendar year exceeds $25,000 multiplied by the applicable percentage (i.e., 85%).

Under the plan, the maximum number of shares that a participant may purchase during any exercise period is 12,500 shares. In addition, the IRS has established a calendar year maximum purchase equal to a total value of $25,000 in shares, based on the fair market value on the first day of the exercise period. A participant will have no interest or voting right in shares of our common stock covered by the participant’s option until such option has been exercised. No interest is paid on funds withheld, and those funds are used by our company for general operating purposes.

62    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

The plan provides for adjustment of the number of shares for which options may be granted, the number of shares subject to outstanding options, and the exercise price of outstanding options in the event of any increase or decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares as a result of one or more reorganizations, restructurings, recapitalizations, reclassifications, stock splits, reverse stock splits, or stock dividends. If our company dissolves or liquidates, the offering period will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of that action, unless otherwise provided by the Plan Committee. In the event of a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of our company’s assets, each option under the plan will be assumed or an equivalent option substituted by the successor corporation, unless the Plan Committee, in its sole discretion, accelerates the date on which the options may be exercised.

The plan will remain in effect until the earliest of (a) the exercise date that participants become entitled to purchase a number of shares greater than the number of reserved shares available for purchase under the plan, (b) such date as is determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion, or (c) March 31, 2022.

The Board of Directors or the Plan Committee may amend the plan at any time, provided that such amendment may not adversely affect the rights of any participant with respect to previously granted options and the plan may not be amended if such amendment would in any way cause rights issued under the plan to fail to meet the requirements for employee stock purchase plans as defined in Section 423 of the Code. To the extent necessary to comply with Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, Section 423 of the Code, or any other applicable law or regulation, the Board of Directors will obtain stockholder approval for an amendment.

Our stockholders will not have any preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for the shares reserved for issuance under the plan. If any option granted under the plan expires or terminates for any reason other than having been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares subject to that option will again be available for purposes of the plan.

2004 Incentive Stock Plan

Our 2004 Incentive Stock Plan was designed to attract, motivate, retain, and reward our executives, employees, officers, directors, and independent contractors by providing such persons with annual and long-term performance incentives to expend their maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value. Under the plan, we were permitted to grant stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses, and other stock awards. The persons eligible to receive awards under the plan consisted of officers, directors, employees, and independent contractors. Upon the approval by our stockholders of our 2013 Incentive Stock Plan in September 2013, we ceased making new grants under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan.

There were outstanding issued but unexercised options to acquire 200,667 shares of our common stock at an average exercise price of $7.70 per share under the plan as of April 30, 2020. There were issued and outstanding 9,000 undelivered RSUs under the plan as of April 30, 2020.

2013 Incentive Stock Plan

Our 2013 Incentive Stock Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors in August 2013 and approved by our stockholders in September 2013. The plan is designed to assist us and our subsidiaries and other designated affiliates, which we refer to as Related Entities, in attracting, motivating, retaining (including through designated retention awards), and rewarding high-quality executives, employees, officers, directors, and individual consultants who provide services to us or our Related Entities, by enabling such persons to acquire or increase a proprietary interest in our company

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        63


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

in order to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such persons and our stockholders, and providing such persons with performance incentives to expend their maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value.

Under the plan, we may grant stock options, SARs, restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs, shares granted as a bonus or in lieu of another award, dividend equivalents, and other stock-based awards or performance awards. The persons eligible to receive awards under the plan consist of officers, directors, employees, and consultants who are natural persons providing bona fide services to our company or any Related Entity and whose services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising transaction, and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for shares of our common stock. However, incentive stock options may be granted under the plan only to employees of our company, or of any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of our company, including our officers who are employees. There were no outstanding issued but unexercised options to acquire shares of our common stock under the plan as of April 30, 2020. There were issued and outstanding 1,305,058 undelivered RSUs and PSUs under the plan as of April 30, 2020. The material features of the plan are outlined below.

Shares available for awards; adjustments. The number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the plan is 3,000,000 shares, plus any shares that were reserved and remained available for grant and delivery under our 2004 Incentive Stock Plan as of the date the plan became effective. Any shares that are subject to an award under the plan will be counted against this limit as one share for every one share granted.

If any shares subject to (i) any award under the plan (or, after the effective date of the plan, shares subject to any award granted under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan), are forfeited, expire, or otherwise terminate without issuance of such shares, or (ii) any award under the plan (or, after the effective date of the plan, shares subject to any award granted under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan), that could have been settled with shares is settled for cash or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of the shares, the shares to which those awards were subject, will, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration, termination, cash settlement, or non-issuance, again be available for delivery with respect to awards under the plan.

Any share that again becomes available for delivery pursuant to the provisions describedpay ratio disclosure presented above will be added back as one share.

The administrator of the plan is authorized to adjust the limitations on the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the plan and the individual limitations on the amount of certain awards (other than the $100,000 limitation with respect to incentive stock option awards) and will adjust outstanding awards (including adjustments to exercise prices of options and other affected terms of awards) to the extent it deems equitable in the event that any extraordinary dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, shares of common stock, or other property), recapitalization, forward or reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects our common stock so that an adjustment is appropriate.

Administration. The plan is to be administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors; provided, however, that if our Board of Directors fails to designate a compensation committee or if there are no longer any members on the compensation committee so designated by our Board of Directors, or for any other reason determined by our Board of Directors, then our Board of Directors will serve as the administrator. Subject to the terms of the plan, the administrator is

64    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

authorized to select eligible persons to receive awards, grant awards, determine the type, number and other terms and conditions of, and all other matters relating to, awards, prescribe award agreements (which need not be identical for each participant), and the rules and regulations for the administration of the plan, construe and interpret the plan and award agreements, correct defects, supply omissions or reconcile inconsistencies therein, and make all other decisions and determinations as the administrator may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the plan.

Stock options and stock appreciation rights. The administrator is authorized to grant stock options, including both incentive stock options, or ISOs, which can result in potentially favorable tax treatment to the participant, and non-qualified stock options, and SARs entitling the participant to receive the amount by which the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise exceeds the grant price of the SAR. The exercise price per share subject to an option and the grant price of a SAR are determined by the administrator, provided that the exercise price per share of an option and the grant price per share of a SAR will be no less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date such option or SAR is granted. An option granted to a person who owns or is deemed to own stock representing 10% or more of the voting power of all classes of stock of our company or any parent company (sometimes referred to as a “10% owner”) will not qualify as an ISO unless the exercise price for the option is not less than 110% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date such ISO is granted.

The maximum term of each option or SAR, the times at which each option or SAR will be exercisable, and provisions requiring forfeiture of unexercised options or SARs at or following termination of employment generally are fixed by the administrator, except that no option or SAR may have a term exceeding ten years, and no ISO granted to a 10% owner (as described above) may have a term exceeding five years (to the extent required by the Code at the time of grant). Methods of exercise and settlement and other terms of options and SARs are determined by the administrator. The administrator, thus, may permit the exercise price of options awarded under the plan to be paid in cash, shares, other awards or other property (including loans to participants).

Restricted stock. The administrator is authorized to grant restricted stock. Restricted stock is a grant of shares of common stock, which are subject to such risks of forfeiture and other restrictions as the administrator may impose, including time or performance restrictions or both. A participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the rights of a stockholder of our company (including voting and dividend rights), unless otherwise determined by the administrator.

Restricted stock units. The administrator is authorized to grant restricted stock units, or RSUs. An award of RSUs confers upon a participant the right to receive shares of common stock or cash equal to the fair market value of the specified number of shares covered by the RSUs at the end of a specified period, subject to such risks of forfeiture and other restrictions as the administrator may impose, including time or performance restrictions or both. Prior to settlement, an award of RSUs carries no voting or dividend rights or other rights associated with share ownership, although dividend equivalents may be granted.

Dividend equivalents. The administrator is authorized to grant dividend equivalents conferring on participants the right to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, shares of common stock, other awards, or other property equal in value to dividends paid on a specific number of shares of common stock or other periodic payments. Dividend equivalents may be granted in connection with another award, may be paid currently or on a deferred basis and, if deferred, may be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares of common stock, awards, or otherwise as specified by the administrator.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        65


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Shares granted as a bonus or in lieu of another award. The administrator is authorized to grant shares of our common stock as a bonus free of restrictions, or to grant shares of common stock or other awards authorized under the plan, in lieu of our obligations to pay cash under our 2013 Incentive Stock Plan or other plans or compensatory arrangements.

Other stock-based awards. The administrator is authorized to grant awards that are denominated or payable in, valued by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to shares of common stock. The administrator determines the terms and conditions of such awards.

Performance awards. The administrator is authorized to grant performance awards to participants on terms and conditions established by the administrator. The performance criteria to be achieved during any performance period and the length of the performance period will be determined by the administrator upon the grant of the performance award. Performance awards may be valued by reference to a designated number of shares (in which case they are referred to as performance shares) or by reference to a designated amount of property including cash (in which case they are referred to as performance stock units, or PSUs). Performance awards may be settled by delivery of cash, shares of common stock or other property, or any combination thereof, as determined by the administrator.

Other terms of awards. Awards may be settled in the form of cash, shares of common stock, other awards, or other property, in the discretion of the administrator. The administrator may require or permit participants to defer the settlement of all or part of an award in accordance with such terms and conditions as the administrator may establish, including payment or crediting of interest or dividend equivalents on deferred amounts, and the crediting of earnings, gains, and losses based on deemed investment of deferred amounts in specified investment vehicles. The administrator is authorized to place cash, shares of common stock, or other property in trusts or make other arrangements to provide for payment of our obligations under the plan. The administrator may condition any payment relating to an award on the withholding of taxes and may provide that a portion of any shares of common stock or other property to be distributed will be withheld (or previously acquired shares of common stock or other property be surrendered by the participant) to satisfy withholding and other tax obligations. Awards granted under the plan generally may not be pledged or otherwise encumbered and are not transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or to a designated beneficiary upon the participant’s death, except that the administrator may, in its discretion, permit transfers subject to any terms and conditions the administrator may impose thereon.

Acceleration of vesting; change in control. Subject to certain limitations contained in the plan, including those described in the following paragraph, the administrator may, in its discretion, accelerate the exercisability, the lapsing of restrictions or the expiration of deferral or vesting periods of any award. In the event of a “change in control” of our company, as defined in the plan, any restrictions, deferral of settlement, and forfeiture conditions applicable to an award will not lapse, and any performance goals and conditions applicable to an award will not be deemed to have been met, as of the time of the change in control, unless either (i) we are the surviving entity in the change in control and the award does not continue to be outstanding after the change in control on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the change in control or (ii) the successor company does not assume or substitute for the applicable award, as determined in accordance with the terms of the plan. In the event of a change in control and either, (i) we are the surviving entity in the change in control and the award does not continue to be outstanding after the change in control on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the change in control or (ii) the successor company does not assume or substitute for the applicable award, as determined in accordance with the terms of the plan, the applicable award agreement may

66    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

provide that any restrictions, deferral of settlement, and forfeiture conditions applicable to an award will lapse, and any performance goals and conditions applicable to an award shall be deemed to have been met, as of the time of the change in control. If the award continues to be outstanding after the change in control on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the change in control, or the successor company assumes or substitutes for the applicable award, as determined in accordance with the plan, the applicable award agreement may provide that with respect to each award held by such participant at the time of the change in control, in the event a participant’s employment is terminated without “cause” by our company or any Related Entity or by such successor company or by the participant for “good reason,” as those terms are defined in the plan, within 24 months following such change in control, any restrictions, deferral of settlement, and forfeiture conditions applicable to each such award will lapse, and any performance goals and conditions applicable to each such award will be deemed to have been met, as of the date on which the participant’s employment is terminated.

Amendment and termination. Our Board of Directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the plan or the administrator’s authority to grant awards without further stockholder approval, except that stockholder approval must be obtained for any amendment or alteration if such approval is required by law or regulation or under the rules of any stock exchange or quotation system on which shares of our common stock are then listed or quoted; provided that, except as otherwise permitted by the plan or an award agreement, without the consent of an affected participant, no such action by our Board of Directors may materially and adversely affect the rights of such participant under the terms of any previously granted and outstanding award. The plan will terminate at the earliest of (i) such time as no shares of common stock remain available for issuance under the plan, (ii) termination of the plan by our Board of Directors, or (iii) the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the plan.

CEO Pay Ratio

For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers (including our former President and Chief Executive Officer)) was $52,361, and the annual total compensation of our Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers (excluding our former President and Chief Executive Officer) was $2,790,615. Based on this information, for fiscal 2020, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Co-Presidents and Co-Chief Executive Officers (excluding our former President and Chief Executive Officer) to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was estimated to be 53:1.

We believe this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. Theestimate. Because SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety ofuse different methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonableexemptions, estimates, and assumptions, that reflect their compensation practices. As such, theour CEO pay ratio reported by other companiesdisclosure may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, asby other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.companies.

We selected March 31, 2020,of the relevant year, the end of the closest calendar quarter to our April 30 2020 fiscal year end, as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee,”employee” because it enabled us to make such identification in a reasonably efficient and economical manner.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        67


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

To identify the “median employee,” we considered the prior trailing 12 months of W-2 wages as of March 31, 2020 for our consistently applied compensation measure because we believe that this measure reasonably reflects the annual compensation of our employees. We have estimated the median of the annual salary of our employees, excluding Messrs. Smith, Murphy, and Debney, to be $46,361.

Using this measure, we identified a “median employee” who is a full-time, salaried employee located in Springfield, Massachusetts. Once we identified this median employee, we totaled all of the elements of the employee’s compensation for the relevant fiscal year 2020 in accordance with the requirements of the applicable SEC rules, of the SEC, and consistent with the calculation of total compensation of our Co-PresidentsCEO in the Summary Compensation Table above.

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and Non-PEO NEOs and our performance for the fiscal years listed below. The Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown.

Year

 

Summary Compensation Table Total for Mark P. Smith1 
($)

 

Summary Compensation Table Total for Brian D. Murphy1 
($)

 

Compensation Actually Paid to Mark P. Smith1,2,3
($)

 

Compensation Actually Paid to Brian D. Murphy1,2,3 
($)

 

Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs1 
($)

 

Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs1,2,3
($)

 

Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment based on:4

 

Net Income
($ Thousands)

 

Adjusted EBITDAS
($ Millions)⁵

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TSR
($)

 

Peer Group TSR
($)

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

(c)

 

(d)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

(g)

 

(h)

 

(i)

 

 

2023

 

$

2,305,721

 

$

 

$

694,299

 

$

 

$

765,141

 

$

521,907

 

$

167

 

$

142

 

$

36,876

 

$

95.2

 

 

2022

 

$

2,821,898

 

$

 

$

1,725,797

 

$

 

$

836,695

 

$

344,465

 

$

183

 

$

163

 

$

194,494

 

$

299.6

 

 

2021

 

$

2,704,939

 

$

206,319

 

$

4,393,799

 

$

2,051,760

 

$

785,434

 

$

1,324,456

 

$

229

 

$

198

 

$

252,049

 

$

366.6

 

1. Mark P. Smith was our Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officers (includingOfficer from January 15, 2020 until August 23, 2020; he has served as our former President and Chief Executive Officer)Officer since August 24, 2020. Brian D. Murphy was our Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer from January 15, 2020, until his resignation on August 23, 2020 when he became the CEO of American Outdoor Brands, Inc., which we spun-off to our stockholders in August 2020. The individuals comprising the Non-PEO NEOs for each year presented are listed below.

2021

2022

2023

Deana L. McPherson

Deana L. McPherson

Deana L. McPherson

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

Kevin A. Maxwell

Kevin A. Maxwell

Robert J. Cicero

Susan J. Cupero

Susan J. Cupero

Susan J. Cupero

Robert. J. Cicero

 

Lane A. Tobiassen

 

 

37 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

2. The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by our NEOs. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table Total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below.

3. Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEOs and the Non-PEO NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the summary compensationExclusion of Stock Awards column are the amounts from the Stock Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.

Year

 

Summary Compensation Table Total for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Exclusion of Stock Awards for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Inclusion of Equity Values for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Compensation Actually Paid to Mark P. Smith
($)

 

 

2023

 

$

2,305,721

 

$

(1,502,872

)

$

(108,550

)

$

694,299

 

 

2022

 

$

2,821,898

 

$

(1,371,850

)

$

275,749

 

$

1,725,797

 

 

2021

 

$

2,704,939

 

$

(1,068,599

)

$

2,757,459

 

$

4,393,799

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Summary Compensation Table Total for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Exclusion of Stock Awards for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Inclusion of Equity Values for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Compensation Actually Paid to Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

 

2021

 

$

206,319

 

$

 

$

1,845,441

 

$

2,051,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Exclusion of Stock Awards for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Inclusion of Equity Values for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

 

2023

 

$

765,141

 

$

(367,134

)

$

123,900

 

$

521,907

 

 

2022

 

$

836,695

 

$

(351,308

)

$

(140,922

)

$

344,465

 

 

2021

 

$

785,434

 

$

(164,012

)

$

703,034

 

$

1,324,456

 

The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:

Year

 

Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

Total - Inclusion of
Equity Values for Mark P. Smith
($)

 

 

2023

 

$

1,154,226

 

$

(1,258,255

)

$

 

$

(4,521

)

$

 

$

 

$

(108,550

)

 

2022

 

$

835,528

 

$

(562,497

)

$

 

$

2,718

 

$

 

$

 

$

275,749

 

 

2021

 

$

943,468

 

$

1,695,528

 

$

 

$

118,463

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,757,459

 

38 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

Year

 

Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

Total - Inclusion of
Equity Values for Brian D. Murphy
($)

 

 

2021

 

$

 

$

1,668,625

 

$

 

$

176,816

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,845,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Average Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Average Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

Total - Average Inclusion of
Equity Values for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

 

2023

 

$

281,965

 

$

(154,040

)

$

 

$

(4,025

)

$

 

$

 

$

123,900

 

 

2022

 

$

161,687

 

$

(54,762

)

$

 

$

29,853

 

$

(277,700

)

$

 

$

(140,922

)

 

2021

 

$

155,563

 

$

322,806

 

$

15,616

 

$

296,420

 

$

(87,371

)

$

 

$

703,034

 

4. The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table above.utilizes the Russell 1500 Leisure Products Index, which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report for the year ended April 30, 2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting April 30, 2020 through the end of the listed year in the Company and in the Russell 1500 Leisure Products Index, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.

5. We determined Adjusted EBITDAS to be the most important financial performance measure used to link our performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs and Non-PEO NEOs in fiscal year 2023. More information on Adjusted EBITDAS can be found in the Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this Proxy Statement. This resultedperformance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for fiscal years 2022 and 2021, and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in an annual total compensationfuture years.

Description of $52,361.Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years.

39 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

img125871598_7.jpg 

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and our Net Income during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

40 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

img125871598_8.jpg 

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company-Selected Measure

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and our Adjusted EBITDAS during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

41 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

img125871598_9.jpg 

Description of Relationship Between Company TSR and Peer Group TSR

The following chart compares our cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years to that of the Russell 1500 Leisure Products Index over the same period.

img125871598_10.jpg 

42 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Executive Compensation

Tabular List of Most Important Financial [and Non-Financial] Performance Measures

The following table presents the financial performance measures that we consider to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs and Non-PEO NEOs for fiscal 2023 to our performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.

Adjusted EBITDAS

Net Sales

TSR

43 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


AUDIT MATTERS

PROPOSAL FOUR – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

68    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee, with advice from its independent compensation consultant, determines, or recommends to our Board of Directors for determination, the compensation of our Board of Directors. We currently pay each non-employee director an annual retainer in the amount of $70,000. We also pay additional sums to our Chairman of the Board, Vice Chairman of the Board, Chairs of our Board Committees, and members of our Board Committees as follows:

Chairman of the Board

  $37,500 

Vice Chairman of the Board

  $23,000 

Chair, Audit Committee

  $25,000 

Chair, Compensation Committee

  $25,000 

Chair, Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee

  $12,000 

Non-Chair Audit Committee Members

  $8,000 

Non-Chair Compensation Committee Members

  $5,000 

Non-Chair Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee Members

  $3,500 

In addition, each member of the Audit Committee receives an additional $1,500 per Audit Committee meeting attended in excess of seven meetings per year; each member of the Compensation Committee receives an additional $1,500 per Compensation Committee meeting attended in excess of six meetings per year; and each member of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $1,500 per Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended in excess of four meetings per year. We also reimburse each director for travel and related expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board of Director and committee meetings. Employees who also serve as directors receive no additional compensation for their services as a director.

Each non-employee director receives a stock-based grant to acquire shares of our common stock on the date of his or her first appointment or election to our Board of Directors. Each non-employee director also receives a stock-based grant at the meeting of our Board of Directors held immediately following our annual meeting of stockholders for that year. Stock-based grants were in the form of RSUs for 5,414 shares of common stock, 5,501 shares of common stock, and 14,455 shares of common stock in fiscal 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively, except in the case of Ms. Britt, who was appointed as a director in February 2018 and received RSUs for 9,514 shares of common stock at the time of her appointment. The RSUs vest one-twelfth each month, and the delivery of the underlying shares generally will not be made until the first anniversary of the final vesting date of the award.

The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us to each non-employee director for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020. Mr. Debney did not receive any compensation for service on our Board of Directors.

  Name (1)  

Fees Earned or
Paid in

Cash (2)

   Stock
Awards (3)
   All Other
Compensation
  Total 

Barry M. Monheit

  $117,504   $85,000   $1,490(5)  $203,994 

Robert L. Scott

  $96,504   $85,000   $23,820(4)  $205,324 

Anita D. Britt

  $87,919   $85,000   $1,485(5)  $174,404 

Robert H. Brust

  $39,585   $   $  $39,585 

John B. Furman

  $104,496   $85,000   $  $189,496 

Gregory J. Gluchowski, Jr.

  $81,504   $85,000   $4,011(5)  $170,515 

Michael F. Golden

  $69,996   $85,000   $  $154,996 

Mitchell A. Saltz

  $69,996   $85,000   $8,301(4)  $163,297 

I. Marie Wadecki

  $96,504   $85,000   $  $181,504 

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        69


  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION  

(1)

AsWhat Am I Voting On? The Board is asking our stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of April 30, 2020, eachDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2024

Voting Recommendation:FORthe ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm

Vote Required: The affirmative vote of a majority of the non-employee directors hadvotes cast is required to approve the following numberproposal

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? Yes. Organizations holding shares of stock awards outstanding, which represent undelivered shares underlying vested RSUs: Mr. Monheit (22,956); Mr. Scott (22,956); Ms. Britt (19,956); Mr. Brust (5,501); Mr. Furman (19,956); Mr. Gluchowski (19,956); Mr. Golden (19,956); Mr. Saltz (19,956); and Ms. Wadecki (22,956). As of April 30, 2020, each of the non-employee directors had the following number of stock options outstanding: Mr. Monheit (0); Mr. Scott (10,000); Ms. Britt (0); Mr. Brust (0); Mr. Furman (20,000); Mr. Gluchowski (0); Mr. Golden (10,000); Mr. Saltz (0); and Ms. Wadecki (0).beneficial owners may vote in their discretion

Abstentions: No effect

(2)

All fees were paid in cash.

(3)

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value for stock awards granted to the directors calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of these awards are set forth in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020.

(4)

Consists of reimbursement of medical coverage costs.

(5)

Consists of costs for certain products provided without cost.

We lease 3,000 square feet of office space in Scottsdale, Arizona, which has offices for certain senior personnel in our investor relations department as well as office space for our Board of Directors. The lease expires on April 30, 2021. The office and the secretarial support services provided at that location also satisfy the requirements to maintain a Scottsdale office and provide secretarial support contained in our December 5, 2003 severance agreement entered into with Mr. Saltz in connection with his resignation as an executive officer of our company.

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers. For more detailed information regarding our stock ownership guidelines, see “Corporate Governance — Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

70    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information with respect to our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options under our equity compensation plans as of April 30, 2020.

  Plan Category  

(a)

Number of
Securities to
be Issued
Upon
Delivery of
Shares for
Restricted
Stock Units

   

(b)

Number of
Securities to
be Issued
Upon Exercise
of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights

   

(c)

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights (1)

   

(d)

Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a)) (2)

 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders

   1,314,058    200,667   $7.70    8,869,383 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders

                

Total

   1,314,058    200,667   $7.70    8,869,383 

(1)

The weighted average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding RSUs, which have no exercise price.

(2)

Under our 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, an aggregate of 6,551,076 shares of our common stock was authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under such plan. The number of available shares will be increased by the number of shares with respect to which awards previously granted under such plan are terminated without being exercised, expire, are forfeited or cancelled, do not vest, or are surrendered in payment of any awards or any tax withholding with respect thereto. As of April 30, 2020, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan was 4,507,530. Our 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan authorizes the sale of up to 6,000,000 shares of our common stock to employees. As of April 30, 2020, there were 4,361,853 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        71


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee, consisting of threefour independent directors. Alldirectors, each of the members of the Audit Committee arewhom is “independent” of our company and management, as independence is defined in applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules.

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the oversight of ourthe Board of Directors in the integrity of theour financial statements, of our company, our company’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters, our policies and practices related to information security, the independent registered public accountant’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of our company’s independent registered public accountant. The primary responsibilities of the committeeAudit Committee include overseeing our company’s accounting and financial reporting process and audits of theour financial statements of our company on behalf of the Board of Directors.Board.

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The independent registered public accountant is responsible for auditing the financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the committeeAudit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accountant. The committeeAudit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accountant the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. This includedBoard, including a discussion of the independent registered public accountant’s judgments as to the quality not just the acceptability, of our company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the committee under generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the committeeAudit Committee received from the independent registered public accountant written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountant’s communications with the committeeAudit Committee concerning independence. The committeeAudit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accountant theirits independence from management and our company,us, including the matters covered by the written disclosures and letter provided by the independent registered public accountant.

The committeeAudit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accountant the overall scope and plans for its audit. The committeeAudit Committee met with the independent registered public accountant, with and without management present, to discuss the results of the examinations, its evaluations of our company,us, the internal controls, and the overall quality of the financial reporting. The committee held five meetings during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the committeeAudit Committee recommended to the Board, of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report onthe Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2020 for filing with the SEC.10-K.

The report has been furnished by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors as of August 21, 2020.

Committee: Anita D. Britt, Chairman

Britt; Chairman; John B. FurmanFurman; Robert L. Scott; and Denis G. Suggs.

I. Marie Wadecki – Served until August 23, 2020.

img125871598_11.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 44


72    

Audit Matters

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, officers, and persons that own more than 10 percent of a registered class of our company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Directors, officers, and greater than 10 percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish our company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon our review of the copies of such reports received by us during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that each person who, at any time during such fiscal year, was a director, officer, or beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during such fiscal year.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        73


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares as of August 21, 2020 by (1) each director, nominee for director, and named executive officer of our company, (2) all directors and executive officers of our company as a group, (3) each person who served as a director or named executive officer as of the end of our fiscal ended April 30, 2020 but no longer serves in such capacity as described herein, and (4) each person known by us to own more than 5% of our common stock.

  Name of Beneficial Owner (1)  Number of
shares (2)
  Percent (2) 

Current Directors and Executive Officers:

   

Mark P. Smith

   54,366(3)   * 

Robert J. Cicero

   50,095(4)   * 

Anita D. Britt

   29,470(5)   * 

John B. Furman

   42,790(5)   * 

Michael F. Golden

   278,887(6)   * 

Barry M. Monheit

   102,118(7)   * 

Mitchell A. Saltz

   82,370(8)   * 

Robert L. Scott

   102,818(9)   * 

Former Directors and Executive Officers

   

P. James Debney

   374,338   * 

Brian D. Murphy

   27,607(10)   * 

Jeffrey D. Buchanan

   167,955   * 

Gregory J. Gluchowski, Jr.

   55,861(5)   * 

Lane A. Tobiassen

   24,101(11)   * 

I. Marie Wadecki

   62,556(5)   * 

All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

   1,455,332(12)(13)   2.59

Other significant stockholders:

   

BlackRock, Inc.

   4,850,631(14)   8.68

Dimensional Fund Advisors

   4,585,306(15)   8.20

The Vanguard Group

   3,830,895(16)   6.85

FMR

   3,447,049(17)   6.17

Renaissance Technologies

   3,022,900(18)   5.41

*

Percentage of ownership of less than one percent.

(1)

Except as otherwise indicated, each person named in the table has the sole voting and investment power with respect to all common stock beneficially owned, subject to applicable community property law. Except as otherwise indicated, each person may be reached as follows: c/o Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 2100 Roosevelt Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104.

(2)

The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or entity is determined under the rules promulgated by the SEC taking into effect shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of the record date. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the person or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power. The number of shares shown includes, when applicable, shares owned of record by the identified person’s minor children and spouse and by other related individuals and entities over whose shares such person has custody, voting control, or power of disposition. The percentages shown are calculated based on 55,900,419 shares outstanding on August 21, 2020. The numbers and percentages shown include shares actually owned on August 21, 2020, shares that the identified person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of such date, and shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of such date. In calculating the percentage of ownership, all shares that the identified person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of August 21, 2020 upon the exercise of options or the delivery of RSUs or PSUs and all shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of the record

74    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

date are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of shares owned by that person or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of shares stock owned by any other person or group.

(3)

Includes 12,290 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.

(4)

Includes 12,268 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.

(5)

Includes (a) 5,501 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (b) 14,455 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.

(6)

Includes (a) 10,000 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options; (b) 5,501 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (c) 14,455 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.

(7)

Includes (a) 5,501 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; (b) 14,455 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (c) 3,000 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but the delivery of which is deferred until retirement from the Board. The shares are held by Barry M. Monheit, Trustee, SEP PROP Monheit Family Trust U/A Dtd 7/16/2002.

(8)

Includes (a) 5,501 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (b) 14,455 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date. The shares are held by Stockbridge Enterprises, L.P., of which Mr. Saltz is the Manager.

(9)

Includes (a) 5,501 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; (b) 14,455 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (c) 3,000 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but the delivery of which is deferred until retirement from the Board.

(10)

Includes 12,904 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.

(11)

Includes (a) 4,225 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (b) 11,421 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.

(12)

For current Directors and Executive Officers of our company, includes (a) 10,000 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options; (b) 33,006 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; (c) 111,288 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of the record date; and (d) 6,000 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but the delivery of which is deferred until retirement from the Board.

(13)

For former Directors and Executive Officers of our company, includes (a) 15,227 shares underlying RSUs that have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (b) 53,235 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of the record date.

(14)

Based on the statement on Amendment No. 11 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 4,749,711 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,850,631 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(15)

Based on the statement on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power over 4,404,029 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,585,306 shares. The address of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.

(16)

Based on the statement on Amendment No. 10 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power over 49,734 shares; shared voting power over 3,196 shares;

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        75


  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  

sole dispositive power over 3,782,365 shares; and shared dispositive power over 48,530 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(17)

Based on the statement on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 7, 2020, FMR LLC has sole voting power over 403,177 shares; and FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson each have sole dispositive power over 3,447,049 shares. The address of FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson is 245 Summer St., Boston, MA 02210.

(18)

Based on the statement on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020, Renaissance Technologies LLC and Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation each have sole voting and dispositive power over 3,022,900 shares. The address of Renaissance Technologies LLC and Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation is 800 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

76    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Unless delegated to the Compensation Committee by our Board of Directors, the Audit Committee charter requires the Audit Committee to review and approve all related party transactions and to review and make recommendations to the full Board of Directors, or approve, any contracts or other transactions with current or former executive officers of our company, including consulting arrangements, employment agreements, change-in-control agreements, termination arrangements, and loans to employees made or guaranteed by our company. We have a policy that we will not enter into any such transaction unless the transaction is determined by our disinterested directors to be fair to us or is approved by our disinterested directors or by our stockholders. Any determination by our disinterested directors is based on a review of the particular transaction, applicable laws and regulations, policies of our company (including those set forth above under “Corporate Governance” or published on our website), and the listing standards of Nasdaq. As appropriate, the disinterested directors of the applicable committees of the Board of Directors shall consult with our legal counsel or Internal Auditor.

Our company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with our company.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        77


PROPOSAL TWO – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (“SAY-ON-PAY”)

Background

The Dodd-Frank Act enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.

Summary

We are asking our stockholders to provide advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (which consist of those serving as our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our two other executive officers) as such compensation is described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure set forth in this proxy statement. Our philosophy with respect to executive compensation is to pay base salaries to our executive officers at levels that enable us to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives. Our executive compensation program is designed to link annual performance-based cash incentive compensation to the achievement of pre-established performance objectives, based primarily on our company’s financial results and the achievement of other corporate goals, but also, in some cases, on individual objectives that contribute to our long-term goal of building stockholder value. Similarly, our executive compensation program is designed so that stock-based compensation focuses our executives’ efforts on building stockholder value by aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. To that end, our stock-based compensation generally is intended to result in more limited rewards if the price of our common stock does not appreciate or does not appreciate in an amount equal to or above certain levels, but may provide substantial rewards to our executive officers (as well as to our stockholders in general) if our common stock appreciates or appreciates in an amount equal to or above certain levels. The following is a summary of some of the key points of our executive compensation program. We urge our stockholders to review the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement and the executive compensation tables for more information.

Base Salaries. We target base salaries at levels required to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified individuals assuming that they will not receive incentive compensation, but reflecting the possible receipt of incentive compensation. We increased the base salaries of each of our new Co-Chief Executive Officers, our Chief Financial Officer, and our other named executive officers in fiscal 2020, but we did not increase the base salary of our former Chief Executive Officer.

We maintain a performance-based cash incentive compensation program. We annually establish a performance-based cash incentive compensation program for our executive officers. In establishing a cash incentive compensation program for any particular year or period, we focus on achievement of pre-established performance objectives, based primarily on our company’s financial results and the achievement of other corporate goals. In some cases, we also consider individual objectives, responsibilities, and performance. Our performance-based cash incentive compensation program results in a substantial portion of our executives’ potential total cash compensation being at risk. Based on the achievement of pre-established objective financial performance targets under our 2020 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program that were higher than for fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee awarded our named executive officers performance-based cash incentive compensation of between 50% and 300% of target.

Our stock-based compensation program is designed to align the interests of our management and the interests of our stockholders. We strongly believe in tying executive rewards directly to our

78    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  PROPOSAL TWO – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE  COMPENSATION (“SAY-ON-PAY”)  

long-term success and focusing our executives’ efforts on building stockholder value by aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. To that end, our stock-based compensation generally is intended to result in more limited rewards if the price of our common stock does not appreciate or does not appreciate above certain levels, but may provide substantial rewards to our executive officers (as well as to our stockholders in general) if our common stock appreciates above certain levels. Our stock-based compensation consists primarily of RSUs and PSUs. We generally set the vesting schedule for RSUs over multiple year periods to encourage executive retention. We generally establish multi-year performance requirements for the vesting of PSUs to reward long-term company performance. As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, it is our practice to grant stock-based compensation to our executive officers prior to the beginning of the applicable fiscal year.

Independent Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee retains and works closely with Compensia, an independent national compensation consulting firm, in the design and implementation of its annual executive compensation program. Compensia provides no other services to our company.

Board Recommendation

Our Board of Directors believes that the information provided above and within the “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” sections of this proxy statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program is designed appropriately and is working to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation.

We value and consider the feedback we receive from our stockholders regarding our executive compensation programs. The feedback from our stockholders, and our resulting actions, are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Compensation Committee carefully monitors the compensation of our peer group companies, conduct stockholder outreach, and consider the views of proxy advisory firms and our compensation committee also gets substantial input from an experienced and highly regarded firm of compensation consultants. The Compensation Committee considers, in the context of the highly cyclical industry environment in which our company operates and is forecasted to be operating during the applicable fiscal year, the fiscal year operating budget prepared by management. The Compensation Committee then develops the Annual Executive Cash Incentive Program for the forthcoming fiscal year after the foregoing peer group review, compensation consultant advice, stockholder outreach, and review of proxy advisory firm policies. The Compensation Committee attempts to design an incentive plan, which is challenging but attainable, that incentivizes management at budget targets as well as at various levels of out-performance given industry conditions.

We urge our stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and other related tables and narrative disclosures, which describe in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives.

The following resolution is submitted for a stockholder vote at the meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, executive compensation tables, and narrative discussion set forth in this proxy statement.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        79


  PROPOSAL TWO – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE  COMPENSATION (“SAY-ON-PAY”)  

The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on our company, our Board of Directors, or our Compensation Committee. Although non-binding, the vote will provide information to our Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices, which our Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the years to come.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DESCRIBED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION AND THE RELATED TABULAR AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

Our recommendation is particularly strong given our management’s performance during fiscal 2020 despite the onset of COVID-19 pandemic that closed down the operations of many companies. Our management team was able to keep our entire business operating due to a broad range of safety procedures and cleaning protocols, which were implemented early and aggressively to significantly reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission and keep our employees safe. The ability of the business to remain operational during that period allowed our business to address an increase in consumer demand that began during our fiscal fourth quarter. Our management team also performed in an exemplary manner while devoted substantial time and attention to the Separation. Our management’s actions were instrumental in delivering a strong conclusion to fiscal 2020 and beyond.

80    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL THREE – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

Our Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to audit theour consolidated financial statements of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 20212024 and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the ratification of such appointment. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. We anticipate that representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the meeting,2023 Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. The Audit Committee first appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements in 2014.

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services by our independent registered public accountant is compatible with maintaining their independence and has determined that Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence is not compromised by providing such services.

Audit Fees and Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed to our companyus by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the fiscal years ended April 30, 20192023 and 20202022 are as follows:

  2019   2020 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Audit Fees

  $915,000   $2,855,796 

 

$

973,720

 

 

$

916,485

 

Audit-Related Fees

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

  $915,000   $2,855,796 

 

$

973,720

 

 

 

$

916,485

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit services for fiscal 20192023 and 20202022 consisted of the audit of our consolidated financial statements, the audit of our internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the review of our quarterly financial statements. Auditstatements, fees in 2020 related to the Separation were $1,872,946.consent on Form S-8 filed in fiscal 2023, and fees related to our response to an SEC comment letter.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

The charter of our Audit Committee charter provides that the duties and responsibilities of ourthe Audit Committee include the pre-approval of all audits, audit-related, tax, and other services permitted by law or applicable SEC regulations (including fee and cost ranges) to be performed by our independent registered public accountant. Any pre-approved services that will involve fees or costs exceeding pre-approved levels will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Unless otherwise specified by the Audit Committee in pre-approving a service, the pre-approval will be is effective for the 12-month period following pre-approval. The Audit Committee will not approve any non-audit services prohibited by applicable SEC regulations or any services in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent registered public accountant, the purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported by the Code and related regulations.

To the extent deemed appropriate, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to the ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee or any one or more other members of the Audit Committee provided that any member of the Audit Committee who has exercised any such delegation must report any such pre-approval decision to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee will not delegate the pre-approval of services to be performed by the independent registered public accountant to management.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        81


  PROPOSAL THREE – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT     REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT  

OurThe Audit Committee requires that the independent registered public accountant, in conjunction with our Chief Financial Officer,CFO, be responsible for seeking pre-approval for providing services to us and that any request for pre-approval must inform the Audit Committee about each service to be provided and must provide detail as to the particular service to be provided.

All

45 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


MANAGEMENT PROPOSALs

PROPOSAL FIVE - ADVISORY VOTE TO CALL SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING

What Am I Voting On? The Board is asking our stockholders to vote on the resolution listed below

Voting Recommendation of the Board:FOR the proposal

Vote Required: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the proposal

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

Resolution and Supporting Statement

RESOLVED, that stockholders approve the Board of Directors taking steps necessary to amend the appropriate governing documents of the servicesCompany to give owners of a combined 25% of the Company’s outstanding shares who satisfy certain other procedures and requirements to be determined by the Board in the future the power to call a special meeting of stockholders.

Overview. We are providing stockholders with the opportunity to vote on an advisory resolution considering approval of amendment of our Bylaws to provide stockholders with the right to call a special meeting of stockholders (a “special meeting”). Our stockholders do not currently have the right to require us to call a special meeting. This proposal (the “Board’s Special Meeting Proposal”) is the product of the Board’s ongoing review of our corporate governance principles, feedback from our stockholders, and the Board’s consideration of the advisory stockholder special meeting proposal outlined in Proposal 7 (the “Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal”). After due consideration and a balancing of the interests discussed below, the Board has determined that stockholders should be provided the opportunity to consider this alternative proposal regarding the right to call a special meeting. Specifically, the Board asks our stockholders to vote to approve the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal to allow stockholders who own at least 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock, and satisfy certain other procedures and requirements to be determined by Deloitte & Touche LLPthe Board in the future, to require us to call a special meeting.

The Board’s Special Meeting Proposal. The Board recognizes that some stockholders believe that the right of stockholders to call a special meeting is a helpful governance mechanism. Through this proposal, the Board intends to strike an appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The Board believes special meetings should be extraordinary events, held only if a significant number of stockholders agree that a special meeting is necessary to discuss critical, time-sensitive issues. In consideration of this Proposal 5, the Board considered the disruption special meetings cause and the substantial costs they entail; specifically, the Board, the Company’s management, and our employees must devote significant time and attention to preparing for a special meeting, which takes their time and attention away from their primary focus of overseeing and operating our business. In addition, with each special meeting, we must incur significant expenses in order to prepare the disclosures required for such meeting, print and distribute materials, solicit proxies, and tabulate votes. Moreover, a 25% threshold serves the best interests of our stockholders as a whole by avoiding the potential for abuse of the right by one or a small minority of stockholders that may pursue special interests.

img125871598_11.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 46


Management Proposals

The Role of Stockholder Engagement. The Board considered the views of our stockholders in connection with crafting this proposal. In early calendar 2023, we requested meetings with the corporate governance teams at stockholders representing 44% of our outstanding shares, as a result of which we engaged with teams at stockholders representing 10% of our outstanding shares. We used these meetings to discuss a variety of governance-related topics, including our stockholders’ views of rights to call special meetings. Based on these discussions, we believe our stockholders generally support rights to call special meetings at a 25% threshold. In particular, certain of our stockholders expressed concerns that a 10% threshold is too low.

Recommendation Only. This advisory vote will not be binding on the Board. The Board will, however, take the outcome of the vote into account when considering whether to implement the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal. To create a stockholder right to call a special meeting, the Board must approve an actual amendment to our Bylaws.

For the reasons described above, underas well as below in the caption “Audit-Related Fees” wereBoard’s Opposition Statement to Proposal 7, the Board believes the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal more appropriately balances the rights of stockholders with the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal (this Proposal 5) and against the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal 7). Approval of the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal. Although the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal and the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal concern the same subject matter, the terms of each proposal differ. If both the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal and the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal are approved, bythe Board will take the voting results into consideration and will continue to engage with stockholders as part of the Board’s consideration of any future actions.

For these reasons, the Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the advisory approval of the right of stockholders owning a combined 25% of our Audit Committee pursuantoutstanding shares to our Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies.call a special meeting.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT OF OUR COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 2021.

47 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Management Proposals

82    

    LOGO

PROPOSAL SIX - RATIFICATION OF NEVADA EXCLUSIVE FORUM PROVISION

2020 Proxy Statement

What Am I Voting On? The Board is asking our stockholders to ratify a recent amendment to our Bylaws designating the state and federal courts of Nevada as the exclusive forum for certain legal actions

Voting Recommendation of the Board:FOR the proposal

Vote Required: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the proposal

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

Supporting Statement


In February 2023, the Board adopted amendments to our Bylaws to, in part, specify that the sole and exclusive forum for certain legal actions and proceedings involving us will be the state and federal courts of Nevada, unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum (the “Exclusive ForumProvision”). On February 28, 2023, we filed with the SEC a report on Form 8-K that included as Exhibit 3.1 thereto our Bylaws incorporating the Exclusive Forum Provision1, the full text of which appears below:

PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

The SistersTo the fullest extent permitted by law, and unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the state and federal courts in Nevada shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought in the name or right of the Holy NamesCorporation or on its behalf, (b) any action asserting a claim for breach of Jesus and Mary and Catholic Health Initiatives,any fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Proponents,Corporation’s stockholders, (c) any action arising or asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of NRS Chapters 78 or 92A or any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or these bylaws or (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, including, without limitation, any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Articles of Incorporation or these bylaws. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notifiednotice of and consented to the company that they intendprovisions of this Article VIII.

Although our Bylaws allow the Board to presentadopt the Exclusive Forum Provision without stockholder approval or ratification, and the Exclusive Forum Provision became effective upon its adoption by the Board, the Board believes it is important for our stockholders to have the opportunity to consider and vote upon, on a proposal, or Current Proposal, atnon-binding advisory basis, whether the Annual Meeting that reads as follows:

RESOLVED: ShareholdersExclusive Forum Provision is appropriate for us. Therefore, the Board decided to request that stockholders ratify the Exclusive Forum Provision on an advisory basis. The Board is taking this proactive step because it determined it to be the most appropriate way to effect the Exclusive Forum Provision.

1On June 30, 2023, we filed with the SEC a report on Form 8-K that included as Exhibit 3.1 thereto an amended version of our Bylaws. These amendments did not impact the Exclusive Forum Provision.

48 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Management Proposals

The Board believes the Exclusive Forum Provision is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for a variety of reasons. For example, the Board believes the Exclusive Forum Provision:

Reduces litigation costs by avoiding duplicative stockholder derivative lawsuits in more than one forum.

Increases the outcome predictability of Directorslitigation since multiple forums may produce inconsistent results.

Provides a streamlined, efficient, and organized process for resolving particular disputes.

Ensures disputes concerning our governance and internal affairs proceed in a forum consisting of American Outdoorjudges who are more experienced with Nevada’s statutes and relevant case law.

The Board understands that the Exclusive Forum Provision may limit a plaintiff’s ability to bring the specified claims in a judicial forum other than Nevada. However, the Exclusive Forum Provision is narrowly tailored to regulate only the forum where plaintiffs may file specified claims relating to specified actions – it does not restrict the ability of a plaintiff to bring such claims, nor the remedies available if such claims are ultimately successful under Nevada law. The Exclusive Forum Provision also permits us to consent to the selection of an alternative forum.

If stockholder ratification is not obtained, the Board will reconsider whether the Exclusive Forum Provision is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

For these reasons, the Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR ratifying the Exclusive Forum Provision.



49 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


stockholder proposals

PROPOSAL SEVEN - RIGHT TO CALL SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING

Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021-2100, has notified us that he intends to present the following proposal at the 2023 Annual Meeting. The proponent has indicated that he holds the requisite number of shares of our common stock in accordance with Rule 14a-8 requirements. The proponent’s resolution and supporting statement are quoted verbatim below in the section entitled “Resolution and Supporting Statement.” We are not responsible for the content of the proponent’s proposal or supporting statement.

What Am I Voting On? Stockholders are being asked to vote on the resolution listed below

Voting Recommendation of the Board:AGAINSTthe proposal

Vote Required: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the proposal

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

Proposal 7 – Adopt a Shareholder Right to Call a Special Shareholder Meeting

img125871598_12.jpg 

Shareholders ask our board to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting (or the lowest percentage according to state law) regardless of length of stock ownership also in accordance with state law. And to enable street name shareholder and non street name shareholder to have as much equal rights in calling for a special shareholder meeting as allowed by state law.

Calling for a special shareholder meeting is hardly ever used by shareholders but the main point of the right to call for a special shareholder meeting is that it gives shareholders at least significant standing to engage effectively with management.

Management will have an incentive to genuinely engage with shareholders instead of stonewalling if shareholders have a realistic Plan B option of calling a special shareholder meeting. Often the management of a company will claim that shareholders have multiple means to communicate with management – but in most cases these low impact means are as effective as mailing a post card to the CEO. A reasonable shareholder right to call a special shareholder meeting is an important step for effective shareholder engagement with management.

Please vote yes:

Adopt a Shareholder Right to Call a Special Shareholder Meeting – Proposal 7

img125871598_11.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 50


Stockholder Proposals

The Board’s Opposition Statement

After carefully considering the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal, the Board has concluded that it is not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal.

However, because the Board recognizes that providing stockholders the ability to request special meetings is viewed by some stockholders as a helpful governance mechanism, it has recommended an approval of the right of stockholders owning a combined 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock to request a special meeting as presented in the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal 5). We believe a 25% ownership threshold strikes the appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders as opposed to the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal (this Proposal 7).

Special meetings impose significant costs, both administrative and operational, and the Board, the Company’s management, and our employees must devote significant time and attention to preparing for a special meeting, which takes their time and attention away from their primary focus of overseeing and operating our business. One or a small minority of stockholders should not be entitled to cause such significant expense and distraction to advance their own special interests, which may not be shared more broadly by our other stockholders. Therefore, special meetings should only be called to discuss critical, time-sensitive issues that cannot be delayed until our next annual meeting of stockholders in cases where a substantial portion of stockholders agree that a special meeting must be called. A failure to receive 25% support to convene a special meeting is a strong indicator that the issue is unduly narrow and not deemed critical by our stockholders generally. Providing a special meeting request right at a low threshold, such as the one proposed in this Proposal 7, risks giving a small number of stockholders a disproportionate amount of influence over our affairs. A higher threshold than the one contemplated by this Proposal 7 also ensures that a more meaningful number of stockholders are seeking to call the special meeting, rather than only one or a few. Based on these considerations, the Board believes the 25% threshold outlined in Proposal 5 strikes a more appropriate balance than the 10% threshold in this Proposal 7. Requiring a 25% threshold ensures that stockholders have the right to request a special meeting to act on extraordinary and urgent matters while minimizing the risk that one or a small minority of stockholders will pursue special interests that are not aligned with, or in the best interests of, the Company or its other stockholders. In addition, the 25% threshold will protect us from unduly incurring substantial costs and distraction.

We are committed to maintaining strong corporate governance practices and procedures, including stockholder engagement initiatives. See “Board and Governance Matters” for more information. In light of our existing policies and practices and the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal 5), the Board believes the adoption of the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal would not serve the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. Accordingly, the Board has determined that the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal 5), and not the Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal (this Proposal 7), is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Approval of this Stockholder Special Meeting Proposal (this Proposal 7) is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the Board’s Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal 5).

For these reasons, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Proposal 7.

51 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Stockholder Proposals

PROPOSAL EIGHT - HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Mercy Investment Services, Inc., 2039 North Geyer Road, St. Louis, MO 63131-3332, and other co-filers 2, has notified us that it intends to present the proposal listed below at the 2023 Annual Meeting. The proponent has indicated that it holds the requisite number of shares of our common stock in accordance with Rule 14a-8 requirements. The proponent’s resolution and supporting statement are quoted verbatim below in the section entitled “Resolution and Supporting Statement.” We are not responsible for the content of the proponent’s proposal or supporting statement.

What Am I Voting On? Stockholders are being asked to vote on the resolution listed below

Voting Recommendation of the Board:AGAINSTthe proposal

Vote Required: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the proposal

Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? No – broker non-votes have no effect

Abstentions: No effect

RESOLVED: Shareholders direct the Smith & Wesson Brands, Corp. (“AOBC”)1 adopt a comprehensive policy articulating its commitmentInc. (Smith & Wesson) board of directors to respectoversee an independent third-party Human Rights Impact Assessment which assesses and produces recommendations for improving the human rights which includes a descriptionimpacts of proposed due diligence processes to identify, assess, preventits policies, practices, and mitigate actualproducts, above and potential adversebeyond legal and regulatory matters. Input from stakeholders, including human rights impacts.organizations, employees, and customers, should be considered in determining the specific matters to be assessed. A report on the assessment, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential/proprietary information, should be published on the company’s website by August 1, 2024.

WHEREAS:

The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (hereinafter UNGPs),(UNGPs)3 state:

The that companies have a responsibility to respect human rights requireswithin their operations and throughout their value chains. This responsibility necessitates that business enterprises: (a) Avoid causing or contributing to adversecompanies know their human rights impacts through their own activities,risks and address suchimpacts; take concrete steps to prevent, mitigate, and remediate adverse impacts when they occur; [and] (b) Seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that are directly linked to their operations, products or services by their business relationships, even if they have not contributed to those impacts.2

In order to meet their responsibility to respect human rights, business enterprises should have in place policies and processes appropriate to their size and circumstances, including . . . [a] policy commitment to meet their responsibility to respect human rights.3

As investors, we seek to identify and assess human rights risks and impacts in portfolio companies because they can have direct implications for shareholder value and, depending onpublicly communicate how they are managed, can affect a company’s long-term viability.addressing their most severe impacts on people connected with their business.

Given the

The inherent lethality of firearms products and the potential for their misuse, the risk of adverseexposes all gun makers to elevated human rights impacts is especially elevated for all gun manufacturers, including AOBC.

Companies exposed to human rights risks may incur significant legal4, reputational and financial costs that are material to investors, and a public-facing human rights policy that includes a human rights due diligence process is essential to managing these risks. The responsibility of business enterprises to respect human rights applies to all enterprises regardless of their size, sector, operational context, ownership or structure. Nevertheless, the scale and complexity of the means through which enterprises meet that responsibility may vary according to these factors or with the severity of the enterprise’s adverse human rights impacts.

While AOBC has a number of corporate policies, including a Code of Ethics, the information available on its web site does not mention a public commitment to respect human rights.

A public policy that articulates the company’s commitment to respect human rights and describes its efforts to avoid contributing to adverse human rights impacts would assure shareholders that these risks are being adequately managed.

The UNGPs recommend that such a policy should:

·

Refer to internationally recognized human rights.

1

We changed our name to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. on May 29, 2020, after the Current Proposal was filed.

2

https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf (section 13)

3

https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf (section 15a)

4

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-17/smith-wesson-sued-by-victims-of-2018-mass-shooting-in-toronto

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        83


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

·

Stipulate that the human rights expectations of personnel, business partners and other parties directly linked to its operations, products or services will be publicly available and communicated to all relevant parties;

·

Apply throughout the company’s value chain and in operating environments regardless of legal requirements; and

·

Be embedded throughout company functions and reflected in operational policies and procedure.

Proponent Catholic Health Initiatives owned shares of our common stock that had a market value of over $2,000 on the date the Proponents notified us of its intent to file the Current Proposal. The Proponents’ addresses are: Sr. Judy Byron, Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, PO Box 398, Marylhurst, OR 97036 and Laura Krausa, System Director Advocacy Programs, Catholic Health Initiatives, 198 Inverness Drive West, Englewood, CO 80112.

Summary of Our Position and Board of Directors Recommendation

Despite having acknowledged in their 2018 proposal (the “2018 Proposal”) that “[g]un violence is a public health crisis with extraordinary human and financial costs,” the Proponents persist in their argument that a human rights policy, which necessarily would contain an obligation to mitigate these “extraordinary” costs, would have no impact on our business model. Instead, the Proponents present to shareholders an unrealistic picture, touting the Current Proposal as providing only benefits.

The Current Proposal is the third straight year that the Proponents have proposed a shareholder resolution rooted in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (“UNGP”).5 In the 2018 Proposal, the Proponents requested that the Board issue a report (the “Shareholder Report”) on our activities relating to gun safety measures and the monitoring of violent acts associated with the company’s products. In the Exempt Solicitation filed in connection with that proposal, the Proponents stated:

Importantly, events of gun violence have led to mounting public backlash against gun makers and retailers including calls for boycotts, divestment and demands for gun safety regulation at both the federal and state levels. This environment presents serious business risks which demand a meaningful response from AOBC. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights make clear the corporate responsibility to seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that are directly linked to their operations, products or services by their business relationships, even if they have not contributed to those impacts.6

(emphasis in original, footnote omitted).

In February of 2019, we produced the Shareholder Report, as requested by the Proponents in the 2018 Proposal. We also went further than requested. Instead of merely reporting, we retained a

5

United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, U.N. Doc. HR/PUB/11/04 (2011), https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf.

6

American Outdoor Brands Corp., Notice of Exempt Solicitation Submitted by Non-Management (Form PX14A6G) filed by Intercommunity Peace & Justice Ctr. (Aug. 22, 2018) at p. 1, available athttps://sec.report/Document/0001214659-18-005657/.

84    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

leading social media monitoring company to implement a monitoring program, to evaluate the risks identified by the Proponents. That monitoring program included a retrospective component, looking back twelve months before we published our Shareholder Report. The results of the retrospective monitoring were summarized in the Shareholder Report. We also instituted an ongoing monitoring program for those risks (our “Monitoring Program”), and that Monitoring Program continues to this day. The results of Monitoring Program are reported to us monthly, and those results become part of our consideration of financial and reputational risk issues, including those raised by the Proponents’ Current Proposal.

In 2019, the Proponents presented a shareholder proposal (the “2019 Proposal”) that would have required the company to adopt a human rights policy. The 2019 Proposal was identical in all material respects, to the Current Proposal. The company’s voting shareholders rejected the 2019 Proposal by an approximately 2 to 1 margin. In opposing the 2019 Proposal, we identified a host of existing policies and explained how those policies addressed the reputational and financial risks raised by the Proponents. The 2019 Proposal was the subject of an extensive debate regarding the obligations imposed by the UNGP, the high costs of conducting the requested due diligence and of mitigating even indirect and potential “human rights impacts.” The company provided shareholders with potential financial costs of mitigating these “human rights impacts” as estimated by high profile third-parties, such as Amnesty International (“Amnesty”), that were in the tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars. While the Proponents argued that they were not affiliated with Amnesty, they never expressed any disagreement with Amnesty’s conclusions on potential financial costs to the company. despite having ample opportunity to do so.

In connection with the 2019 Proposal, we met with many shareholders to discuss the reputational and financial issues raised by the proposal and obtained shareholder feedback. Those discussions demonstrated that most shareholders believed that it would be productive for us to develop a policy that provided a more holistic approach to risk, one that tied together the company’s various policies. For that reason, despite the rejection of the 2019 Proposal by the shareholders, we adopted our “Corporate Stewardship Policy” (the “Policy”).7 The Policy addresses shareholder concerns in a manner the Board views as consistent with and appropriate for the nature and size our business.

Despite the voluntary steps we have taken in response to feedback from shareholders during our engagement activities, and our development of policies we believe are specific to and appropriate for our business, the Proponents now return for a third year, once again raising the specter of financial and reputational risk and insisting on a human rights policy consistent with the UNGP. We view the newly adopted Corporate Stewardship Policy, along with pre-existing policies and practices, including our Monitoring Program, as placing the reputational and financial risk issues raised by the Proponents in their proper context. Given that we operate almost entirely within the United States, a country with strong constitutional and legal protections for human rights, attempts to address the broader human rights issues that the Proponents present would create substantial potential liability for only marginal, if any, additional benefit.

The financial and reputational issues the Proponents raise also appear to have little merit considering the results of the Monitoring Program implemented by the company. Monitoring has made it clear that the primary risk to our company comes from the efforts of gun control advocates, a group that is unlikely to be moved by the adoption of a human rights policy, to stop its attacks on the company. The financial and reputational risk that is most relevant to the company is the risk that a

7

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Corporate Stewardship Policy,https://ir.smith-wesson.com/corporate-stewardship-policy.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        85


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

human rights policy will affect the company’s product offerings or engagement in society in a way that will alienate our supporters in the firearms enthusiast community.

Once again, the Current Proposal is presented as purely beneficial to the company, failing to mention the substantial costs and liabilities the Current Proposal may, and likely will, impose on us. The Proponents do so despite their prior statement in the 2018 Proposal that “[g]un violence is a public health crisis with extraordinary human and financial costs.” The Proponents seek to avoid the obvious meaning of this statement by arguing in a July 13, 2020 letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the company has “discretion to select the specific human rights principles that will be included in its policy, . . . .”8 But the international human rights regime that the Proponents seek to impose on us is not an a la carte menu, from which a company can select and pay only for what it wants. In any event, the Proponents obviously believe that our discretion is severely limited, as demonstrated by their complete rejection of our Corporate Stewardship Policy as a valid exercise of that discretion. Shareholders should consider the substantial potential costs of the Current Proposal as articulated by the Proponents themselves, their affiliated organizations, and the most well-known and influential international human rights organizations, that have a much greater public profile and presence than the Proponents.

For these reasons, without question, the Current Proposal is contrary to the best interests of our shareholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors strongly recommends a vote “AGAINST” the Current Proposal.

Detailed Support for Our Position

The Company’s Existing Policies and Its Recently Adopted Corporate Stewardship Policy Adequately Address the Company’s Financial and Reputational Risk

In 2019, the Proponents submitted the 2019 Proposal, centered on human rights issues, which in all material respects, is identical to the Current Proposal and which also relied on the UNGP. Our shareholders rejected the 2019 Proposal, with approximately 64% of the votes cast against the proposal.

Despite that rejection by shareholders, we moved to address those aspects of the 2019 Proposal relevant to our business. We had extensive conversations and exchanges with shareholders over the human rights issues raised by the Proponents. Part of this discussion included the extent to which private party enforcement of human rights violations was necessary in the United States, where the legal and regulatory framework already is highly protective of human rights. In this respect, we took note of the fact that human rights issues most often arise in supply chains for which there is inadequate oversight, or which involve multiple foreign countries with questionable human rights enforcement. In addition, at the Board’s direction, our management team engaged in communications with the Proponents about their various proposals. Because the company and its suppliers operate primarily in the United States, where there is a valid, competent, existing legal and regulatory framework to address any human rights abuses that may exist, we concluded that an extensive policy and program focused exclusively on human rights issues had limited relevance to our business.

Our discussion with shareholders did make clear that there were aspects of corporate social responsibility and human rights on which shareholders desired greater clarity. This shareholder engagement resulted in our recently adopted Corporate Stewardship Policy that further clarifies our approach to Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) issues of specific relevance to the

8

Letter from Sister Judy Byron to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Jul. 13, 2020) at p. 3.

86    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

company. The Policy expressly recognizesSmith & Wesson admits that “reducing the harm caused by the unlawful or improper use of any product, including firearms, is an issue of legitimate public concern” concern…and that mitigatingto the extent that we can take effective steps to mitigate harm…we might enhance the rights of lawful gun owners.”4

In fact, this harm “may fosteris a greater understandingpervasive and uniquely American problem. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were over 48,830 deaths from firearms in 2021,5 and firearms have become the leading cause of death for children in the U.S., surpassing all other causes in 2022.6 80.7% of all

2 Co-filers include: Adrian Dominican Sisters; Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc.; CommonSpirit Health; the Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the benefits of private ownership of firearms.” The Policy articulates our desire to achieve the dual objectives of (i) addressing “employee, safety, and governance risks, including the risks caused by the unlawful or improper use of firearms, and (ii) preserving the right to bear arms enshrinedProtestant Episcopal Church in the United States Constitution.of America; Providence St. Joseph Health; the School Sisters of Notre Dame, Central Pacific Province; the Sisters of Bon Secours USA; the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia; the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary and Trinity Health.

3 https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/GuidingprinciplesBusinesshr_eN.pdf

4 https://ir.smith-wesson.com/static-files/a66d1a75-6794-48dc-8e16-9d60e3486220

5 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7140a4.htm?s_cid=mm7140a4_w#T1_down

6 https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/issue-brief/child-and-teen-firearm-mortality-in-the-u-s-and-peer-countries/

52 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Stockholder Proposals

homicides and 54.8% of all suicides in 2021 involved firearms and Americans were killed by guns at the highest rate in 30 years.7A 2022 study from the University of Chicago Harris Public Policy and NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 75% believe “gun violence is a major problem in the United States,and about “4 in 10 Americans believe that it is at least somewhat likely that they will become a victim of gun violence within the next five years.”8

In 2019, in response to a shareholder proposal that achieved majority support, Smith & Wesson published a report on its measures to address gun safety.9 It should be noted that this report failed to put forward meaningful solutions to address gun violence, nor did the report assess or address the company’s human rights risks.

Human rights risks have direct implications for shareholder value and, depending on whether and how they are managed, can be a bellwether for a company’s long-term viability. A company’s efforts to demonstrate that its policies and practices reflect internationally accepted human rights standards can lead to successful and sustainable business planning, and improved relations with customers, workers, communities, investors, and business partners.

The Policy further discussesBoard’s Opposition Statement

After carefully considering the actionsproposal, the Board has concluded that it is not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Summary of Our Position

For the fifth year in a row, the proponent seeks to impose on the Company and its stockholders substantial international obligations rooted in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (the UNGP”). Our stockholders have repeatedly rejected similar efforts in the past because of legitimate concerns about exposing us (and their investments in us) to “human rights costs” estimated at $557 billion per year.10 Although this time the proponent presents its position as seeking a third-party human rights impact assessment (“HRIA”), the issue remains the same – the proponent seeks to impose the UNGP precisely because it would require us to reduce our lawful product offerings and accept a framework for assessing broad societal harms created by human rights groups.

It is no secret that people are deeply divided on the issue of private firearm ownership. Indeed, the debate over gun rights is a classic public policy argument that has generated passionate discussion. The proponent now proposes transferring the power to decide how we proposenavigate these complex issues from stockholders to a third-party with no stake in the Company, one who presumably is more amenable to the proponent’s policy views.

Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have addressed the debate over the Second Amendment in favor of the utility of firearms in preserving liberty and promoting self-defense. Many individuals and gun control activists disagree. Some, including the proponent, even want to ban entire classes of commonly-owned firearms11 or abolish firearms altogether. Gabriel Giffords has made clear her desired outcome – “[g]uns, guns, guns. No more guns. Gone.”12

7 https://time.com/6220410/gun-firearm-homicide-suicide-us-2021/

8 https://harris.uchicago.edu/files/uchicago_harris_ap_norc_poll_report_final.pdf

9 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092796/000119312519032245/d704097dex991.htm

10 Everytown, The Economic Cost of Gun Violence (July 19, 2022) (suggesting gun violence has an annual economic impact of $557 billion).

11 Global Sisters Report, Adrian Dominican Sisters Call for Reasonable Gun Laws in Wake of School Shooting in Texas (May 25, 2022).

12 Philip Elliott, ‘No More Guns. Gone’: Why Gabby Giffords Isn’t Giving Up, Time Mag. (Apr. 26, 2023).

53 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Stockholder Proposals

We reject absolutist views as inconsistent with individuals’ fundamental right to provide for their own security. We believe self-defense is a basic human right; gun rights are compatible with human rights because gun rights (particularly when exercised in the personal protection context) may be used to promote human safety; and we (as a firearm manufacturer) have a critical role to play in empowering individuals to exercise this right.

While we respect differing views and welcome discussion on these topics, we reject the proponent’s view that stockholders should relinquish their authority to make these critical decisions to a third party. That is essentially what the proposal demands. But the exercise would be one of expending our resources for no benefit because an HRIA is incapable of resolving differing policy views. Any third party engaged to conduct an HRIA would only satisfy the proponent’s demands if it adopts the proponent’s policy judgment.

Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal.

Years ago, we identified gun control-focused stockholder activism as an inappropriate means for resolving policy arguments. In February 2019, we published a Shareholder Requested Report on Product Safety Measures and Monitoring Industry Trends (our “2019 Report”) in response to a stockholder resolution submitted by the same core group of stockholders. Our 2019 Report highlighted the flawed assumptions that “there exists a point when groups fundamentally opposed to private gun ownership will accept private gun ownership” and that “[our] reputation among [our] customers for being strong defenders of the Second Amendment is worth risking for a vague goal of improving [our] reputation among non-customers or anti-gun groups.” More than four years later, the disagreements between gun control activists like the proponent and gun rights advocates like us are just as intractable, if not more so.

One example, in particular, demonstrates how the proposal is hostage to this problem. The proposal provides that the third-party assessor should consult human rights organizations. One of the best known such organizations, Amnesty International, already has concluded that the negative societal impact of firearms is $225 billion.13 No amount of “due diligence” will convince the proponent and other activists that their conclusions on the need for firearm bans and ownership restrictions are flawed.

Our focus on stockholder engagement and continuous improvement in our approach to ESG issues is an effective risk management approach – even more so today. Underlying the proposal is an unstated assumption that a third party is needed to supplant the judgment of a board of directors that has not given sufficient attention to these issues. That is simply wrong. We maintain a robust stockholder engagement program14 and have taken meaningful action in response to investor concerns.15 Our approach provides an effective risk management framework without creating the risk of extra-legal liabilities associated with the proposal and its fixation on the UNGP.

13See, Amnesty International, In the Line of Fire – Human Rights and The US Gun Violence Crisis (2018) (suggesting that the direct costs of gun violence are over $3 billion a year and indirect costs are up to $222 billion).

14 See “Board and Governance Matters – Board and Committee Governance – Stockholder Engagement.” Notably, despite meeting with the proponent four times in 2021 and 2022, we first learned of the proponent’s interest in a HRIA when we received the proposal in 2023.

15 See Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 2022 Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) (Aug. 3, 2022) at Proposal 5 – Stockholder Proposal (stating “We continue to make meaningful progress on our ESG Journey” and listing meaningful accomplishments).

54 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Stockholder Proposals

The current debate surrounding ESG illustrates the danger of using the boardroom and third parties to engage in policy debates. The ESG landscape is evolving rapidly, and the push in state legislatures for and against ESG measures has created significant complexities for companies.16 For example, while a bill in California would prohibit financial institutions that do business with firearm manufacturers from doing business with the state, recently enacted laws in other states prohibit certain companies from discriminating against the firearm industry. This volatile environment reinforces the view that the gun rights debate is a public policy argument best resolved by means other than gun control-focused stockholder activism. Indeed, the recent backlash against Anheuser-Busch illustrates the risk companies face when they take controversial positions on ESG issues that fail to respect their customers’ views17 and the recent decision by credit card processors to back away from plans to implement a special code for firearm retailers illustrates the real potential for backlashes on ESG issues affecting our industry.18

In addition to being incapable of resolving public policy arguments, HRIAs are deeply flawed. We learned more about HRIAs as part of our review of the proposal, including by interviewing firms with experience conducting HRIAs, one of which the proponent recommended. Here is what we learned.

HRIA design is extremely flexible, which in practice means the result often is dictated by the views of those conducting the exercise. No doubt, while the proposal refers to an “independent third party,” “independent,” in the proponent’s view, is someone who accepts the proponent’s policy judgment. Indeed, we were alarmed to learn that a representative of a firm we interviewed (which was recommended by the proponent) has posted troubling social media posts, including one expressing offensive views of conservatives. HRIAs are also highly subjective exercises that invite “stakeholder” manipulation. A respected human rights authority refers to HRIAs as “an emerging science. No one knows quite what they are or should be.”19 Such an experimental process is not the place to resolve contested policy issues.

HRIAs are costly. An example cited by the proponent allegedly cost millions of dollars. It is no wonder that five of six shareholder proposals in 2022 that called for HRIAs were submitted to mega-cap companies that have the financial wherewithal to pay for them.20

We also learned that HRIAs typically focus on discrete issues (e.g., supply chain) or projects (e.g., a specific facility), rather than something as broad and unknowable as a product’s impact on society, as the proposal requires. A representative of a firm we interviewed said she could not imagine how many years it would take to meet these objectives, including, “[s]triv[ing] to manage our environmentalassess the impact and look[ing] for opportunities to minimize our environmental impact across our operations” and “[e]valuat[ing] financial and reputational riskof firearms. Finally, we learned that an HRIA conducted pursuant to the company arisingproposal would reference only international human rights conventions (e.g., the UNGP). Given that more than 90% of our sales derive from the organized opposition toU.S., a country whose laws are recognized as upholding human rights, these international conventions would provide little added benefit while creating significant conflict not only with the private ownershipU.S. Constitution but also the substantial body of firearmsfederal and identifying ways to mitigate such risk.”

Our Corporate Stewardship Policy does not exist in a vacuum. It supplements our existing policies, including our comprehensive “Code of Business Conduct” and related “Guidelines on Ethical Behavior,” as well as other policies and procedures the company has in place to address various risks relevantstate law specifically applicable to our business, including those relatedbusiness.

Not only are HRIAs not fit for purpose, they are also deeply flawed. It would be irresponsible to business ethics, anti-corruption, trade compliance, third-party due diligence, environmental healthsubstitute the informed judgment of the Board and safety, firearms compliance,our management for that of a third party.21

16 See Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Navigating the Current ESG Landscape: Recommendations for the Board and corporate governance. The Policy also integrates all those policies, muchManagement (May 22, 2023) (noting “… ESG has emerged as a domestic political battleground with businesses and their leadership increasingly caught in the way thatcrossfire.”).

17See Jennifer Maloney, How Bud Light Blew It, Wall St. J.(May 21, 2023) (stating a politically inspired product boycott is causing a 28% drop year-over-year in sales volume).

18See Jake Fogleman, Visa, Mastercard, and Discover ‘Pause’ Plans for New Gun Store Code, The Reload (March 9, 2023) (quoting a Visa spokesperson saying “Multiple U.S. states are considering legislation to prohibit or restrict the Proponents argued a human rights policy should be “embedded throughout company functionsuse of the new merchant category code … There is now significant confusion and reflected in operational policies and procedure.” The significant difference being that the Policy does not expose the company to the sweeping obligations and liabilities that the Proponents themselves have identified as “extraordinary human and financial costs.” Instead, the Policy focuses on addressing ESG issues in a manner consistent with the company’s lawful business, the robust legal protections afforded human rightsuncertainty in the company’s major market,payments ecosystem, and shareholder value.

Taking the Proponents at their word thatstate actions disrupt the objective of their proposal is to mitigate financial and reputational risk to SWBI, our policies achieve that objective far more effectively. The Proponents implicitly accept that this is the case, as their only criticism of our approach is that our existing policies do not “mention” human rights. That is a distinction without a meaningful difference to the Proponents’ stated concerns about risk mitigation, as such mitigation is a function of action, not words.

The Human Rights Concerns Identified by the Proponents Are Mitigated by a Detailed Constitutional, Legal, and Regulatory Framework

The unstated premiseintent of the Current Proposal andglobal standards.”).

19 Allan Lerberg Jorgensen, the Proponents’ arguments is that absent a specific human rights policy, with a detailed due diligence component, a significant risk exists that human rights violations will occur. That premise is false because an extensive legal regime exists to protect human rights in the context of the company’s business. In fact, the modern view of human rights is codified in the Universal DeclarationDirector of Human Rights and Business at the Danish Institute for Human Rights.

20 Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., General Dynamics Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc.

21 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, supra note 16 (noting that “The politicization of 1947, which expressly recognizesESG not only serves to underscore the dutyimportance of Statesremaining attuned to protect human rights. Even the UNGP on whichperspectives of different stakeholders but also recognizing that such perspectives, however forceful, are not substitutes for the Current Proposal is based,informed judgment of the board and on which the Proponents’ rely heavily, leads with a discussion of this duty.management.”).

States must protect against human rights abuse within their territory and/or jurisdiction by third parties, including business enterprises. This requires taking appropriate steps to prevent, investigate, punish and redress such abuse through effective policies, legislation, regulations and adjudication.9

This State obligation to protect human rights is particularly well-respected in the United States, the country in which all of our manufacturing operations reside, in which all but two of our employees reside, and from which we derive greater than 96% of our revenue from the sale of our products. In

9

UNGP Section I.A.1.

LOGO2020

55 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    87

img125871598_6.jpg 


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  


Stockholder Proposals

fact, in addition

After failing for four consecutive years to impose the many laws in the US that protect human rights, the State Department of the United States has a Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights,costly and Labor. Many international organizations also exist which are engaged in the effort to protect human rights, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Human Rights Council, Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the International Labor Organization, to name just a very few.

Because of the existing human rights framework, the question for us is not whether to adopt some general or abstract human rights policy that may become an endless source of debate – and disagreement – with groups that wish to advance certain agendas. Rather, it is the extent to which human rights issues present a unique challenge to the company that are best addressed by a company policy. The Board has listened to shareholder input on this issue and has concluded that with the adoption of our Corporate Stewardship Policy, the company has addressed the most pressing issues relevant to the company.

SWBI’s Monitoring Program Has Established That the Reputational and Financial Risks Identified by the Proponents are Overstated or Misplaced

In connection with the Proponents’ 2018 Proposal for a shareholder report on our activities relating to gun safety measures and the monitoring of violent acts associated with the company’s products, we decided to conduct an independent and empirical analysis of the Proponents’ allegations of risk. To that end, the company engaged a leading media monitoring company to conduct both a retrospective and prospective analysis of the issues raised by the Proponents. Our Monitoring Program was designed to focus on three issues presented by the Proponents: (1) tracking the use of Smith & Wesson firearms in crimes; (2) understanding how the company’s firearm products are used; and (3) assessing reputational risk for the company. We have modified or expanded on these issues based on experience with the Monitoring Program.

Our Monitoring Program established that the concerns raised by the Proponents that underpinned their 2018 requests for a shareholder report and their 2019 request for a human rights policy baseddangerous UNGP on the UNGP, were either misplaced or overstated. In 2019, the Monitoring Program captured approximately 265,000 mentions of the companyCompany and its relevant sub brands, chief among those, Smith & Wesson. By a wide margin, the overall conversation around the company and our products came from firearms enthusiast and pro-Second Amendment communities, which conversations were favorable toward the company and our brands. The absence of any general discussion around the reputational or financial risk issues raised by the Proponents suggests that such negative discussion resides exclusively with gun control advocates and, therefore, poses no additional risk to the company.

In terms of reports on violence and crimes, the Monitoring Program revealed that firearm brands rarely are mentioned in such reports. Outside of a few major, well-publicized events, such as the February 2019 shooting at a plant in Aurora, Illinois, the brand of the weapon is not a factor in the discussion of the violent acts in which a firearm is used.

The risk of reputational or financial harm is further mitigated by the fact that discussions of risk in the media focus on firearms generally and not any brand of firearms. For example, even with the extensive coverage of major events skewing the numbers, the company, Smith & Wesson or another company brand only factored into the conversation in less than 1% of total coverage on the highly publicized issue of background checks (3,021 mentions in over 425,000). In fact, that pattern held true

88    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

of all media mentions of risks identified by the Proponents. Media mentions rarely reference the company or any of its brands. For example, in the 1.2 million references to mass shootings in social and traditional media in 2019, Smith & Wesson was mentioned in less than one half of one percent (~0.3%) of such coverage.

While brands are very infrequently mentioned, gun control advocates do use these events to push forward with their gun control agenda. That, however, is a risk that is well-known to the firearms industry and to the company, one that our Board always has disclosed in our Report on Form 10-K and other periodic disclosures, and about which our shareholders and other stakeholders are well-informed. This is not a risk that can be mitigated by adopting a human rights policy, unless that policy also requires precisely the types of restrictions on the sale of firearms, and changes to the company’s business that the Proponents argue their human rights policy would not require.

Our Monitoring Program did confirm that one of the most substantial risks we face, is taking any action or position that would diminish our strong support from gun enthusiasts, the pro-Second Amendment community, or others that are likely to purchase our products. While high-profile, emotional events are meaningful to the media and to the gun control community, our Monitoring Program revealed that such events do not result in any significant negative change in the views of these groups and communities that are supportive of the company and its products. To the contrary, support for the firearms industry appears to be inversely related to negative mentions in the media and increased calls for gun control. For example, the Monitoring Program showed that “after the shooting at a plant in Aurora, Illinois, references to Smith & Wesson in media coverage quickly fell to their usual low levels, while social media activity from a supportive enthusiast community spiked.”

The results of our monitoring of financial and reputational risk, lead to two broad conclusions. Most importantly, the greatest risk to the firearms industry and our company is from gun control advocates that are highly organized and that seek to impose their preferred solutions on the industry. This risk cannot be eliminated, because there is no alignment between and among this diverse group of advocates, as to the scope of the perceived problem or their preferred solutions. The range of disagreement is wide, from groups that share the company’s views, to those that seek an outright ban on the manufacture and sale of firearms to private citizens. The result, is an environment where the risk from these gun control advocates cannot be mitigated, short of accepting the agendas of the more extreme groups. In other words, adopting a human rights policy such as that proposed by the Proponents will not placate those groups that present the greatest risk.

Second, at the grass roots level, overwhelming support exists for the firearms industry generally and Smith & Wesson products specifically. But that support is rooted in strongly held views regarding the Second Amendment, which support can quickly dissipate if we act in a manner contrary to those views. It is entirely plausible that our customers may view thestockholders through adoption of a human rights policy, of the type advocatedproposal seeks to achieve the same outcome by the Proponents in the Current Proposal, as a movement toward restrictions on the manufacture or sale of certain firearms. Our customers are educated on gun control issues, including the well-known opposition to the Second Amendment, particularly in the international human rights community. While the Proponents use generalized human rights language to describe their proposal, they have been forthright that their core concern is the private ownership of firearms, or at least the sale and distribution of some firearms. Our customers are not likely to miss that point, especially if it comes to implementing restrictions that may be required by a human rights policy, and subjecting the company to the Proponents’ notions of human rights. Our Monitoring Program, anddifferent means. During our experience as a 168-year-old firearms manufacturer, demonstrates that such a risk is a substantial one, and one that is not counter-balanced by any alleged benefits of the Current Proposal.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        89


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

The Current Proposal Fails to Disclose the Extent of the Obligations It Seeks to Impose or the Costs of Those Obligations

In response to the Proponents’ 2019 Proposal, the Board detailed how third parties with far more influence than the Proponents discussed the use of human rights principles to restrict firearms ownership. Rather than reiterate those arguments, the Board believes it may be of greater value to point out that, regardless of the Proponents’ own intentions, the demand to impose an extensive and ill-defined human rights regime onto a firearms business has the possibility of being destructive of shareholder value.

Despite having acknowledged in their 2018 Proposal that “[g]un violence is a public health crisis with extraordinary human and financial costs,” the Proponents persist in their argument that a human rights policy, which necessarily would contain an obligation to mitigate these “extraordinary” costs, would have no impact on our business model. Instead, the Proponents present to shareholders an unrealistic picture of the Current Proposal, as providing only benefits. The Proponents even have taken issue with our non-controversial statement observation that the Current Proposal could result in financial or legal liability, stating in correspondence to the SEC that “human rights due diligence does not lead to liability.”

Yet just this past May, the Proponents’ affiliate, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (“ICCR”), published through its Investor Alliance for Human Rights project an Investor Toolkit on Human Rights (“ICCR Toolkit”) that says the opposite. 10 The ICCR Toolkit makes it clear that mitigation efforts include financial compensation for the human rights impacts of firearms.

This includes “apologies, restitution, rehabilitation, financial ornonfinancial compensation, punitive sanctions (whether criminal or administrative, such as fines), as well as the prevention of harm through, for example, injunctions or guarantees of non-repetition.” Where a business causes or contributes to adverse impacts, it should play a role in providing remedy.

(emphasis added).11

This assessment of the specific liabilities that a human rights policy would impose, made by the Proponents’ affiliate, is far more consistent with other, high-profile organizations than the Proponents’ dismissive treatment. Many of these organizations, such as Amnesty International, have taken the position that most private ownership of firearms is inconsistentfive-year engagement with the international human rights regime that underpinsproponent, we have addressed the UNGP on which the Current Proposal is based. See Amnesty International, In the Line of Fire: Human Rights and the U.S. Gun Violence Crisis (the “Amnesty International Report”).12 The Amnesty International Report provides an estimate of the potential liability the Current Proposal threatens to impose on the company for the “human rights impacts” of firearm violence, of $3 billion a year in direct costs and up to $222 billion a year in indirect costs.13

10

Investor Alliance for Human Rights, Investor Toolkit on Human Rights (May 2020), https://investorsforhumanrights.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2020-05/Full%20Report
-%20Investor%20Toolkit%20on%20Human%20Rights%20May%202020c.pdf.

11

ICCR Toolkit at 12.

12

See Amnesty International, In the Line of Fire: Human Rights and the U.S. Gun Violence Crisis (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.amnestyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Gun-Report-Full_16.pdf (the “Amnesty International Report”).

13

Amnesty International Report at pp. 115-116.

90    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

Despite being presented with the many opportunities to do so, the Proponents have never disagreed with or rejected the Amnesty International Report. Rather, they have offered only the protestation that they are not “affiliated” with Amnesty. However, one organization with which they are affiliated, the ICCR, has published an “Investor Statement on Gun Violence” which claims that “the annual cost of care for victims of gun violence is an average of $2.8 billion in emergency-room and inpatient charges alone; when lost wages are factored in, the financial burden rises to $45 billion annually.”14 The Giffords Law Center, which is allied with the ICCR, estimates the cost of gun violence to be at least $229 billion a year, before taking into consideration the additional costs of pain and psychological harm.15

From the perspective of what shareholders need to know to measure the potential risk and impact of theCurrent Proposal, it is not important whether the Proponents agree with these positions. These organizations have a greater public presence, magnitudes larger budgets, and are far more relevant to the international human rights discussion than are the Proponents. If these well-known and highly influential organizations have identified human rights “impacts” associated with the manufacture and sale of firearms, then they or others like them can effectively push the position that we must mitigate such impacts in whole or in part under the proposed human rights policy. The cost of such mitigation is something shareholders should consider in determining the impact of the Current Proposal on shareholder value. Yet, the Proponents not only have provided no basis for shareholders to evaluate this critical issue, they have acted in a manner that prevents shareholders from understanding the scope of the potential liability.

Similarly, the Proponents’ demand that we adopt a “due diligence processes to identify, assess, prevent and mitigate actual and potential human rights impacts.” The Proponents fail to explain that the scope and impact of this request is extremely broad. For example, according to the UNGP Interpretive Guide, “[t]he idea of human rights” includes the “right to be treated with dignity.”16 The ICCR Toolkit contains a similarly broad definition:

In general terms, human rights are what every individual is entitled to in order to live a life of fundamental welfare, dignity, and equality. They include civil and political rights such as the rights to life, freedom from harassment and discrimination, privacy, and freedom of expression; economic, social, and cultural rights such as the rights to work, social security, and education; and labor rights such as the rights to freedom of association, collective bargaining, and freedom from forced labor and the worst forms of child labor.17

The ICCR specifically mentions the right to culture, the right to an effective remedy, and even the right to rest and leisure as human rights to which the due diligence and mitigation obligation would apply.18 Merely identifying these issues should alert shareholders to the virtually unlimited scope of the rights the Proponents would seek to compel the company to not merely defend, but to affirmatively advance. The ICCR Toolkit provides a particularly illustrative example of the unexpected

14

Investor Statement on Gun Violence, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, https://www.iccr.org/investor-statement-gun-violence.

15

14See The Economic Cost of Gun Violence, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, https://lawcenter.giffords.org/resources/the-economic-cost-of-gun-violence/.

16

See UN Human Rights Council, The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide, at 9, U.N. Doc HR/PUB/12/2 (2012), https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR.PUB.12.2_En.pdf (“UNGP Interpretive Guide”).

17

ICCR Toolkit at 9.

18

Id. at 45.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        91


  PROPOSAL FOUR – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL  

consequences of the Proponents’ approach. That cited example describes a technology company’s government contract with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the human rights risk presented, merely because the company’s contract assisted ICE with immigration law enforcement.19 Placing that in the context of our firearms sales to police, particularly in the context of recent ‘Defund the Police’ movements, provides meaningful insight to the unstated consequences of a human rights policy.

Similarly, an “adverse human rights impact” is any action “that removes or reduces the ability of an individual to enjoy his or her human rights.”20 This includes “[p]otential Human Rights Impacts,” which may occur but have not yet occurred. The commitment to redress these impacts has no apparent limiting principle as it applies “even if they [the company] have not contributed to those impacts.”21 In other words, the Current Proposal would impose completely unknown obligations – the requirement to assume liability to “mitigate” in some undefined way any “potential” (i.e., unknown) impact to the “dignity” of a human being, even those caused by third-parties. According to the Current Proposal, the duty to mitigate human rights impacts would “[a]pply throughout the company’s value chain and in operating environments regardless of legal framework; . . .” Obviously, the Proponents use the relatively common term “due diligence” to identify something drastically different than shareholders might imply from the common meaning of that term. Shareholders should understand that the due diligence described in the UNGP and that would be required if shareholders approve the Current Proposal, has substantial inherent costs, both in terms of the process imposed on the company, and in terms of the liability that claims for “remediation” will create.

In the past three years, the Board has taken a number of steps to address in an appropriate and targeted manner the reputational and financial concerns raised by the Proponents. These steps should be fully implemented,proponent through direct engagement with our stockholders and their effectiveness measured before considering additional steps, particularly those which identify noby seeking to develop clear additional benefit while imposing substantial obligationssolutions to identifiable problems followed by meaningful action. Our approach has been guided by the knowledge that we are responsible for safeguarding stockholder value in a highly politicized environment and coststhese safeguards are swept aside by the proponent’s insistence on the company. singular path of the UNGP, the essence of which is to require companies to “remedy” even “potential” harms as alleged by third-parties that have no financial interest in those companies.

Our 2019 Report observed that “[c]orporate and securities laws … are increasingly used by special interest groups to advance their political agenda under the guise of advancing corporate governance and addressing corporate ‘reputational risk’” and we expected activists “to continue to propose resolutions designed to achieve their political objectives.” Our warning could not have been more prescient. The intervening years have confirmed that the proposals have, at their core, an objective that would compound the liabilities proponents claim they wish to manage.

Recommendation

For these reasons, and those detailed above, OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.for the reasons explained to our stockholders in detail over the last five years, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the adoption of the proposal.

19

Id. at 30.

20

UNGP Interpretive Guide at 7.

21

Id. at 15.

92    

56 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    LOGOimg125871598_6.jpg 

2020 Proxy Statement



OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION

DEADLINES FOR RECEIPTBENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALSCOMMON STOCK

Deadline forThe following table sets forth certain information regarding the Submissionbeneficial ownership of Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in Our Proxy Statement for Our 2021 Annual Meeting Pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8

If any stockholder intends to present a proposal (other than foroutstanding shares of our common stock as of July 28, 2023 by (1) each of our directors, director nominations) for inclusion in our proxy materials for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, such proposal must comply withnominees, and NEOs, (2) all of the proceduralour directors and substantive requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Actexecutive officers as a group, and must be submitted in writing and received(3) each person known by us atto own more than 5% of our common stock.

Name of Beneficial Owner (1)

 

Number of
shares (2)

 

 

Percent (2)

Directors and Executive Officers (including NEOs):

 

 

 

 

 

Mark P. Smith

 

 

154,015

 

(3)

*

Deana L. McPherson

 

 

44,800

 

 

*

Kevin A. Maxwell

 

 

7,966

 

 

*

Susan J. Cupero

 

 

20,930

 

(4)

*

Anita D. Britt

 

 

29,640

 

(5)

*

Fred M. Diaz

 

 

10,226

 

(6)

*

John B. Furman

 

 

37,526

 

(7)

*

Michelle J. Lohmeier

 

 

 

(8)

*

Barry M. Monheit

 

 

78,802

 

(9)

*

Robert L. Scott

 

 

64,002

 

(10)

*

Denis G. Suggs

 

 

9,926

 

(11)

*

All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)

 

 

457,833

 

(12)

[ ]

Other significant stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.

 

 

3,926,393

 

(13)

[ ]

The Vanguard Group

 

 

3,373,209

 

(14)

[ ]

Renaissance Technologies

 

 

2,511,072

 

(15)

[ ]

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Percentage of ownership of less than one percent.

(1)
Except as otherwise indicated, each person named in the table has the sole voting and investment power with respect to all common stock beneficially owned, subject to applicable community property law. Except as otherwise indicated, each person may be reached as follows: c/o Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 2100 Roosevelt Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104, Attention:01104.
(2)
The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or entity is determined under the rules promulgated by the SEC taking into effect shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of the record date. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the person or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power. The number of shares shown includes, when applicable, shares owned of record by the identified person’s minor children and spouse and by other related individuals and entities over whose shares such person has custody, voting control, or power of disposition. The percentages shown are calculated based on [ ] shares outstanding on July 28, 2023. The numbers and percentages shown include shares actually owned on July 28, 2023, shares that the identified person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of such date, and shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of such date. In calculating the percentage of ownership, all shares that the identified person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of July 28, 2023 upon the exercise of options or the delivery of RSUs or PSUs and all shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested, but are not deliverable, within 60 days of the record date are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of shares owned by that person or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of shares stock owned by any other person or group.
(3)
Includes 7,238 shares underlying RSUs that will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date.
(4)
Includes 1,839 shares underlying RSUs that will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date. 2,300 shares are held by Ms. Cupero’s son.
(5)
Includes 6,725 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date.
(6)
Includes 6,725 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date.
(7)
Includes 6,725 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date.
(8)
Includes 1,307 shares underlying RSUs that will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date.
(9)
Includes (a) 6,725 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (b) 3,000 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but the delivery of which is deferred until retirement from the Board. The shares are held by Barry M. Monheit, Trustee, SEP PROP Monheit Family Trust U/A Dtd 7/16/2002.
(10)
Includes (a) 6,725 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (b) 3,000 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but the delivery of which is deferred until retirement from the Board.
(11)
Includes 6,725 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date.
(12)
Includes (a) 9,427 shares underlying RSUs that have or will have vested and are deliverable within 60 days of the record date; (b) 1,307 shares underlying RSUs that will have vested but are not deliverable within 60 days of the record date; and (c) 6,000 shares underlying RSUs that have vested but the delivery of which is deferred until retirement from the Board.

img125871598_11.jpg 

2023 Proxy Statement I 57


Other Important Information

(13)
Based on the statement on Amendment No. 14 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 3, 2023, BlackRock, Inc. sole voting power over 3,846,424 shares and sole dispositive power over 3,926,393 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
(14)
Based on the statement on Amendment No. 13 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, The Vanguard Group has shared voting power over 35,030 shares; sole dispositive power over 3,299,133 shares; and shared dispositive power over 74,076 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(15)
Based on the statement on Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2023, Renaissance Technologies LLC and Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation each have sole voting and dispositive power over 2,511,072 shares. The address of Renaissance Technologies LLC and Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation is 800 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

We will provide, without charge, a copy of the Form 10-K as filed with the SEC to each stockholder of record as of the record date that requests a copy in writing. Any exhibits listed in the Form 10-K also will be furnished upon request at the actual expense we incur in furnishing such exhibits. Any such requests should be directed to our Secretary at the address of our executive offices set forth in this Proxy Statement.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Based solely upon our review of the copies of such reports received by us during fiscal 2023, we believe that each person who, at any time during such fiscal year, was a director, officer, or beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during such fiscal year, except with respect to a Form 4 filing for Ms. Cupero.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

What is the purpose of the 2023 Annual Meeting?

Stockholders will vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting on the matters summarized in this Proxy Statement.

Why did I receive these proxy materials?

You received these proxy materials because you are a Company stockholder and the Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the 2023 Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement includes information that we are required to provide you under SEC rules and is designed to assist you in voting your shares.

What is included in these proxy materials? What is a Proxy Statement and a proxy?

The proxy materials for the 2023 Annual Meeting include the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement, and our annual report. If you received a paper copy of these materials, the proxy materials also include a proxy card or voting instruction form.

A proxy statement is a document that SEC regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy designating individuals to vote on your behalf. A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote your shares, and that other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. We have designated Mark P. Smith and Deana L. McPherson as proxies for the 2023 Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one notice, proxy materials email, or proxy card?

If you receive more than one notice, proxy materials email, or proxy card, you likely have multiple accounts with brokers and/or our transfer agent and will need to vote separately with respect to each notice, proxy materials email, or proxy card you receive.

58 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Other Important Information

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

The SEC permits us to furnish proxy materials by providing access to those documents on the Internet. Stockholders will not less than 120 calendar daysreceive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. The notice instructs you as to how to submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of the proxy materials, you should follow the instructions in the notice for requesting those materials.

Who may vote?

You may vote if you owned common stock as of the close of business on July 28, 2023, the record date.

How may I vote?

You may vote by any of the following methods:

Internet – follow the instructions on your notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card, or email notice.
Phone – follow the instructions on your notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card, or email notice.
Mail – complete, sign, and return the proxy and/or voting instruction card provided.
Virtually – follow the instructions on the website.

When voting on proposals, you may vote “for” or “against” the item, or you may abstain from voting.

Only stockholders of record may vote electronically during the 2023 Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares and wish to vote electronically during the 2023 Annual Meeting, you must obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the 2023 Annual Meeting.

We encourage you to vote your proxy by Internet, telephone, or mail prior to the anniversary2023 Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting virtually.

May I attend the 2023 Annual Meeting in Person?

The 2023 Annual Meeting will be held exclusively online, with no option to attend in person. You may attend the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2023 and using your 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials to enter the meeting. If you do not have a 16-digit control number, you may still attend the meeting as a guest in listen-only mode. We encourage stockholders to log in to the website and access the webcast early, beginning approximately 15 minutes before the 2023 Annual Meeting’s 10:00 a.m. start time. If you experience technical difficulties, please contact the technical support telephone number posted on the virtual stockholder meeting login page.

If, as of the record date, your shares were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, or similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and you will be required to provide proof of beneficial ownership, such as your most recent account statement as of the record date, a copy of the voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you do not comply with the procedures outlined above, you will not be admitted to the virtual annual meeting.

59 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Other Important Information

Will I be able to ask questions and participate in the virtual annual meeting?

Stockholders of record and proxy holders that provide their valid 16-digit control number will be able to participate in the 2023 Annual Meeting by asking questions and voting their shares as outlined above.

To submit questions during the meeting, stockholders may log into the virtual meeting website with their 16-digit control number, type the question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.”

Only stockholders with a valid 16-digit control number will be allowed to ask questions and engage in dialogue. Questions and comments pertinent to meeting matters will be answered and addressed during the 2023 Annual Meeting as time allows. If we receive substantially similar written questions, we may group these questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition and allow time for additional question topics. If we are unable to respond to a stockholder’s properly submitted question due to time constraints, we will endeavor to respond directly to that stockholder using the contact information provided.

Additional information regarding the rules and procedures for participating in the virtual annual meeting will be provided in our definitivemeeting rules of conduct, which stockholders may view during the 2023 Annual Meeting at the meeting website.

How many shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote on the record date?

[ ] shares.

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy statement was first releasedafter I vote?

Any person giving a proxy may revoke the proxy at any time before its use by delivering to us either a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the meeting and voting electronically during the meeting.

What constitutes a quorum at the 2023 Annual Meeting, and why is a quorum required?

The presence at the 2023 Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of common stock entitled to vote on the record date will constitute a quorum. Votes cast electronically during the meeting or by proxy at the meeting will be tabulated by the election inspector appointed for the meeting, who will determine whether a quorum is present. A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a “registered holder” and as a “beneficial holder?”

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are a registered holder. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, brokerage, or other nominee as custodian on your behalf, you are a beneficial holder.

What if I am a beneficial holder and do not give voting instructions to my broker?

As a beneficial holder, you must provide voting instructions to your bank, broker, or other nominee by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your bank, broker, or other nominee to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like. If you do not provide voting instructions to your bank, broker, or other nominee, whether your shares can be voted by such person will depend on the type of item being considered for vote. All proposals, other than Proposal 4, are “non-routine” matters and therefore non-discretionary items in that they may not be voted on by brokers, banks, or other nominees who have not received specific voting instructions from beneficial holders (so called “broker non-votes”). Proposal 4 is a “routine” matter and, therefore, a discretionary matter in that banks, brokers, and other nominees that do not receive voting instructions from beneficial holders may generally vote on this proposal in their discretion.

60 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Other Important Information

Will any other business be conducted at the Annual Meeting?

We are not aware of any items, other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement, that may properly come before the 2023 Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly brought before the 2023 Annual Meeting, the accompanying proxy will be voted at the discretion of the proxy holders.

What is householding?

Beneficial holders who share a single address may receive only one copy of the notice or the proxy materials, as the case may be, unless their broker, bank, or other nominee has received contrary instructions from any beneficial holder at that address. This is known as householding. If any beneficial holder(s) sharing a single address wishes to discontinue householding and/or receive a separate copy of the notice or the proxy materials, or wishes to enroll in householding, the beneficial holder(s) should contact its broker, bank, or other nominee directly. Alternatively, if any such beneficial holder wishes to receive a separate copy of the proxy materials, we will deliver them promptly upon request in writing (by mailing a request to our principal executive offices).

Who pays for this proxy solicitation?

We bear the costs of soliciting proxies. We will reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies also may be solicited by certain of our directors and officers, personally or by telephone or e-mail, without additional compensation.

We have retained Morrow Sodali LLC, a proxy solicitation firm, to perform various solicitation services in connection with our 2020the 2023 Annual Meeting. We will pay Morrow Sodali a fee of $10,000, plus phone and other related expenses, in connection with its solicitation services. Morrow Sodali has engaged approximately 15 of its employees to assist us in connection with the solicitation of proxies.

When will the Company announce the voting results?

We will announce preliminary voting results at the 2023 Annual Meeting and report the final results on our website and in a current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Stockholders,Proxy Materials for the 2023 Annual Meeting.

These proxy materials, which include the notice of annual meeting, this Proxy Statement, and our annual report, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

How does the Board recommend that you vote?

The Board recommends that you vote as follows:

FOR the election of each of the nominee directors (Proposal 1)
FOR the advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 2023 (Proposal 2)
ONE YEAR for the advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes (Proposal 3)
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accountant of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2024 (Proposal 4)
FOR the advisory vote on the right to call special stockholder meetings (Proposal 5)
FOR the ratification of the Nevada exclusive forum provision (Proposal 6)
AGAINST approval of a stockholder proposal about the right to call special meetings (Proposal 7)
AGAINST approval of a stockholder proposal about a human rights impact assessment (Proposal 8)

61 I 2023 Proxy Statement

img125871598_6.jpg 


Other Important Information

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS OR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR 2024 ANNUAL MEETING

SEC rules permit stockholders to submit proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement if the stockholder and the proposal meet the requirements specified in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement, a stockholder proposal submitted in accordance with Rule 14a-8 must be received by us at our principal executive offices by no later than [ ] 2024, unless the date of our 2020the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders shall have been accelerated or delayed by more than 30 days from October 13, 2021,September 19, 2024, in which case the deadline for submission of the stockholder proposal is a reasonable time before we begin to print and disseminate our definitive proxy materials. Any

Our Bylaws provide that any stockholder proposal and supporting statement(including director nominations) that is not submitted by a stockholder pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 for inclusion in ournext year’s proxy statement may not exceed an aggregate of 500 words.

Deadline forunder Rule 14a-8, but is instead sought to be presented directly at the Submission by Stockholders of Company Director Nominations and Other Business Proposals Not for Inclusion in Our Proxy Statement for Our 20212024 Annual Meeting

Our bylaws require that any stockholder desiring to nominate one or more persons for election must be delivered to our Board of Directors, or to propose other business not for inclusion in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, in each case for consideration and a vote at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must give timely written notice of such nomination or other business proposal by delivery thereof to us at Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 2100 Roosevelt Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104, Attention: Secretary. To be timely, such notice must be so deliveredprincipal executive offices not later than the close of business on July 15, 2021 (i.e., the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders), nor earlier than the close of business on June 15, 2021 (i.e., the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the 2023 Annual Meeting. In each case, the notice must include the information specified in our 2020Bylaws. If the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders), unless the date of our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held earlier than September 13, 2021 (i.e., more than 30 days prior to the first anniversary of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders)before or later than December 22, 2021 (i.e., more than 70 days after the first anniversary date of our 2020the 2023 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders), in which case the notice must be so delivered to us not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or (ii) the 10th10th day after the date on which a public announcement of the date of our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is first made by us. The foregoing 30-day submission periodAccordingly, to submit any such proposal, stockholders must submit the required notice no earlier than the close of business on May 22, 2024 and corresponding time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposesno later than the close of applicable SEC rules relating to our exercise of discretionary voting authority.business on June 21, 2024, except as described above.

Deadline and Requirements for the Submission by Stockholders of Company Director Nominations for Inclusion in

Our Proxy Statement for Our 2021 Annual Meeting Pursuant to Our Proxy Access Bylaw

Our bylawsBylaws permit any eligible stockholder, or any group comprised of up to 20 eligible stockholders, who has beneficially owned 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to submit to us director nominations for inclusion in our proxy materials. The maximum number of [qualified]qualified director-nominees whichthat may be submitted by stockholders for inclusion and included in our proxy materials pursuant to suchthis bylaw (commonly referred to as “proxy access”) is the greater of (i) two or (ii) 20% of the total number of directors then serving in office at the deadline for proxy access nominations (rounded down to the nearest whole number). Any eligible stockholder desiring to nominate a qualified director for our 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        93


  DEADLINES FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS  

pursuant to our proxy access bylaw must give timely written notice of the nomination by delivery thereof to us at Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 2100 Roosevelt Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104, Attention: Secretary.our principle executive offices. To be timely, suchthe notice must be so delivered not later than the close of business on April 30, 2021 (i.e., the 120th day prior to the anniversary of the date our definitive proxy statement was first released to stockholders in connection with our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders),[ ], 2024, nor earlier than the close of business on March 31, 2021 (i.e., the 150th day prior to the anniversary of the date our definitive proxy statement was first released to stockholders in connection with our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders),[ ], 2024, unless the date of our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held earlier than September 13, 2021 (i.e., more than 30 days prior to the first anniversary of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders)August 20, 2024 or later than December 12, 2021 (i.e., more than 60 days after the first anniversary of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders),November 18, 2024, in which case the notice must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or (ii) the 10th day after the date on which a public announcement of the date of our 2021the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is first made by us. Our bylawsBylaws also provide that a stockholder is not eligible to submit a director nomination pursuant to our proxy access bylaw, and an individual is not qualified to be a director nominee pursuant to our proxy access bylaw, if such stockholder or individual, as the case may be, at any time during the three years prior to the date of such notice of nomination or our 20212024 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, has initiated, financially sponsored, supported, or otherwise actively participated in any initiative, campaign, or other process seeking to (i) advance an agenda not directly related the enhancement of stockholder value or (ii) restrict, eliminate, or declare unlawful any business or operation of our company or any of our subsidiaries that has generated revenue, positive earnings, and/or net income in our 2020 fiscal year.2023.

Important Stockholder Notice Requirements

In addition to the foregoing requirements, in the case of stockholder proposals not made pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 and in the case of stockholder nominations of directors pursuant to our proxy access bylaw, our bylaws require a stockholder’s written notice of a director nomination or the proposal of other business, as applicable, to contain, among other things:

·

the name and address of the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf such notice is given;

·

the class and number of shares owned beneficially and of record by the stockholder and any beneficial owner;

·

whether and the extent to which hedging and other transaction(s) have been entered into by or on behalf of the stockholder or any beneficial owner (including any agreement, arrangement, or understanding made with the effect or intent to mitigate loss, manage risk of stock price changes, or increase the voting power of such stockholder or any such beneficial owner) and a general description of such activity; and

·

whether and the extent to which the stockholder or any beneficial owner has any significant equity interest in a competitor or any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any material contract with a competitor and a general description of such equity or pecuniary interest.

For director nominations made by stockholders, our bylaws also require a stockholder’s written notice thereof to contain, among other things, with respect to each proposed director nominee:

·

the name, age, business, and residence address of the proposed nominee;

94    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


  DEADLINES FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS  

·

the proposed nominee’s consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee to serve as a director if elected;

·

a description of all compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements, and understandings entered into by or on behalf of the stockholder or any beneficial owner, on the one hand, and the proposed nominee, on the other hand;

·

any other information relating to the proposed nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act; and

·

with respect to a proxy access bylaw nomination, a copy of the Schedule 14N filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 14a-18 under the Exchange Act (including the details of any relationship not disclosed in the Schedule 14N that would have been described pursuant to Item 6(e) thereof if it existed on the date of submission thereof).

We may also require a proposed nominee to furnish other information (in the form of questionnaires and otherwise) to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as one of our directors.

For stockholder proposals other than director nominations, our bylaws further require a stockholder’s written notice thereof to contain, among other things, a brief description of the business (including the text of the proposed business proposal), the reasons for bringing such business at the annual meeting, and whether and the extent to which the stockholder or any beneficial owner has any material interest in such business proposal and a general description of such material interest.

Prior to making any submission to us, we encourage our stockholders to carefully review, as applicable, the full text of SEC Rule 14a-8 and the full text of our bylawsBylaws for additional requirements to nominate a person for election to ourthe Board of Directors (including information regarding proxy access eligibility, procedural and disclosure requirements, and other relevant requirements to nominate directors) or to submit a proposal for other business at the annual meeting. Proposals should be delivered to our principal executive offices to the attention of the Corporate Secretary. Delivery by email does not constitute delivery to our principal executive offices.

LOGO2020

62 I 2023 Proxy Statement

    95

img125871598_6.jpg 



HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.img125871598_13.jpg 

If you and other stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of our proxy statement and annual report and would like to participate in our householding program, please contact Broadridge by calling toll-free at 800-542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Alternatively, if you participate in householding and wish to revoke your consent and receive separate copies of our proxy statement and annual report, please contact Broadridge as described above.

A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker or other holder of record to request information about householding.

96    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


OTHER MATTERS

We know of no other matters to be submitted to the meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares they represent as our Board of Directors may recommend.

LOGO2020 Proxy Statement        97


APPENDIX A    ADJUSTED EBITDAS

Adjusted EBITDAS, as used in the Proxy Statement and our 2020 Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program, is a financial measure that is not calculated or presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). While we believe that this measure is useful in evaluating our performance and for purposes of determining annual cash incentive, investors should not consider it to be a substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, this financial measure may differ from similarly titled financial measures used by other companies and does not necessarily provide a comparable view of our performance relative to other companies in similar industries.

The table below shows for fiscal years 2020 and 2019 the reconciliation of our GAAP net income as reported in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDAS.

Smith&Wesson® SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET INCOME2100 ROOSEVELT AVENUE SPRINGFIELD, MA 01104 SCAN TO NON-GAAP ADJUSTED EBITDAS

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

   For the Years Ended 
  April 30, 2020   April 30, 2019 

GAAP net income

  $(61,230  $18,410 

Interest expense

   11,604    9,790 

Income tax expense/(benefit)

   1,281    10,328 

Depreciation and amortization

   53,371    52,770 

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,921    7,992 

Diode Recall

   (769    

Impairment of long-lived tangible assets

   98,662    10,396 

Fair value inventory step-up

       454 

Debt extinguishment costs

        

Acquisition-related costs

       28 

COVID-19

   2,474     

CEO separation

   627     

Transition costs

   7,433    1,185 

Change in contingent consideration

   (100   (60
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDAS

  $116,274   $111,293 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

98    

    LOGO

2020 Proxy Statement


LOGO

VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. 2100 ROOSEVELT AVENUE and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic SPRINGFIELD, MA 01104 voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2020SWBI2022 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D23096-P43604D88647-P78625 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. For Withhold For All To withhold authority to vote for any individual The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR All All Except nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the the following: number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 1. PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: ! ! ! To elect as directors all of the nominees listed below to serve until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified: Nominees: 01) Robert L. ScottAnita D. Britt 02) Fred M. Diaz 03) John B. Furman 04) Michael F. Golden 05) Barry M. Monheit 02) Michael F. Golden 06) Mitchell A. Saltz 03) Anita D. BrittRobert L. Scott 07) Mark P. Smith 04) John B. Furman The Board08) Denis G. Suggs For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST For Against Abstain the following proposal:nominee(s) on the line below. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the For Against Abstain 4. PROPOSAL 4: A stockholder proposal, if properly ! ! ! following proposals: presented at the meeting. 2. PROPOSAL 2: To provide a non-bindingapprove on an advisory vote ! ! ! onbasis the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 ("say-on-pay"). Against Abstain For The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST the following proposals: 5. PROPOSAL 5: A stockholder proposal (develop a human rights policy). 6. PROPOSAL 6: A stockholder proposal (simple majority voting). and upon such matters which may properly come before the for fiscal 2020 (“say-on-pay”). meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The shares represented by this proxy, when properly executed, 3. PROPOSAL 3: To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting ! ! ! stockholder(s). If no directions are made, this proxy will firm, as the independent registered public accountant of be voted FOR all directors, FOR proposals 2, and 3, and our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2021.4, and AGAINST proposal 4.proposals 5 and 6. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons named in this proxy will vote in their discretion. For Against Abstain 3. PROPOSAL 3: To approve the Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. 2022 Incentive Stock Plan. 4. PROPOSAL 4: To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent registered public accountant for fiscal 2023. Please email address changes or comments to: investorrelations@smith-wesson.com. NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear(s) on this proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

img125871598_14.jpg 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. D23097-P43604D88648-P78625 SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20202022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OCTOBER 13, 2020September 12, 2022 The undersigned stockholder of SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”"Company"), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement of the Company each dated August 28, 2020, and hereby appoints Mark P. Smith and Deana L. McPherson and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, to be held on Tuesday, October 13, 2020,Monday, September 12, 2022, at 12:10:00 p.m.a.m., Eastern Time, online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SWBI2020SWBI2022 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote all shares of the Company’sCompany's Common Stock that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth on the reverse side. This Proxy will be voted as directed or, if no contrary direction is indicated, will be voted FOR the election of the nominee directors; FOR the say-on-pay proposal; FOR approval of the Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. 2022 Incentive Stock Plan; FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accountant of the Company;Company for fiscal 2023; AGAINST thetwo stockholder proposal;proposals; and as said proxies deem advisable on such other matters as may come before the meeting. A majority of such proxies or substitutes as shall be present and shall act at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof (or if only one shall be present and act, then that one) shall have and may exercise all of the powers of said proxies hereunder. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”"FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEE DIRECTORS, “FOR”"FOR" THE SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL, “FOR”"FOR" APPROVAL OF THE SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. 2022 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN, "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP ASLLPAS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 2021,2023, AND “AGAINST” THE"AGAINST" TWO STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.PROPOSALS. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE. CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.